Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

A Surrogate Based Optimization Approach for the Development of Uncertainty-Aware Reservoir Operational Rules: the Case of Nestos Hydrosystem

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Operation of large-scale hydropower reservoirs is a complex problem that involves conflicting objectives, such as hydropower generation and water supply. Deriving optimal operational rules is a challenging task due to the non-linearity of the system dynamics and the uncertainty of future inflows and water demands. A common approach to derive optimal control policies is to couple simulation models with optimization algorithms. This paper in order to investigate the performance of a future reservoir and safely infer about its significance employs stochastic simulation, thus long synthetically generated time-series and a multi-objective version of the Parameterization-Simulation-Optimization (PSO) framework to develop uncertainty-aware operational rules. Furthermore, in order to handle the high computational effort that ensues from that coupling we investigate the potential of a surrogate-based multi-objective optimization algorithm, ParEGO. The PSO framework is deployed with WEAP21 water resources management model as simulation engine and MATLAB for the implementation of optimization algorithms. A comparison between NSGAII and ParEGO optimization algorithms is performed to assess the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm. The aforementioned comparison showed that ParEGO provides efficient approximations of the Pareto front while reducing the computational effort required. Finally, the potential benefit and the significance of the future reservoir is underlined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Notes

  1. http://www.weap21.org

  2. Component Object Model Application Programming Interface

  3. http://www.itia.ntua.gr/en/softinfo/2/

  4. A MATLAB toolbox is available by Lophaven et al. (2002).

  5. MATLAB Global Optimization Toolbox

References

  • Celeste AB, Billib M (2009) Evaluation of stochastic reservoir operation optimization models. Adv Water Resour 32(9):1429–1443. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2009.06.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Černý V (1985) Thermodynamical approach to the traveling salesman problem: an efficient simulation algorithm. J Optim Theory Appl 45(1):41–51. doi:10.1007/BF00940812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deb K, Agrawal S, Pratap A, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(2):182–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efstratiadis A, Koutsoyiannis D (2010) One decade of multi-objective calibration approaches in hydrological modelling: a review. Hydrol Sci J 55(1):58–78. doi:10.1080/02626660903526292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efstratiadis A, Koutsoyiannis D, Kozanis S (2005) Theoretical documentation of stochastic simulation of hydrological variables model “Castalia”. Integrated Management of Hydrosystems in Conjunction with an Advanced Information System (ODYSSEUS), Contractor: NAMA, Vol. 3. Department of Water Resources, Hydraulic and Maritime Engineering – National Technical University of Athens, Athens, p 61

  • Efstratiadis A, Bouziotas D, Koutsoyiannis D (2012) The parameterization-simulation-optimisation framework for the management of hydroelectric reservoir systems. Paper presented at the Hydrology and Society, EGU Leonardo Topical Conference Series on the hydrological cycle 2012, Torino, European Geosciences Union

  • Efstratiadis A, Dialynas Y, Kozanis S, Koutsoyiannis D (2014) A multivariate stochastic model for the generation of synthetic time series at multiple time scales reproducing long-term persistence. Environ Model Softw 62:139–152. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.08.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester A, Sobester A, Keane A (2008) Engineering design via surrogate modelling: a practical guide. John Wiley & Sons

  • Giunta AA, Wojtkiewicz SF Jr, Eldred MS (2003) Overview of modern design of experiments methods for computational simulations. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 41st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.

  • Hamlet A, Huppert D, Lettenmaier D (2002) Economic value of long-lead streamflow forecasts for Columbia river hydropower. J Water Resour Plan Manag 128(2):91–101. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2002)128:2(91)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin Y (2011) Surrogate-assisted evolutionary computation: recent advances and future challenges. Swarm Evol Comput 1(2):61–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones D, Schonlau M, Welch W (1998) Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions. J Glob Optim 13:455–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220(4598):671–680. doi:10.1126/science.220.4598.671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleijnen J (2009) Kriging metamodeling in simulation: a review. Eur J Oper Res 192(3):707–716. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2007.10.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowles J (2005) ParEGO: a hybrid algorithm with on-line landscape approximation for expensive multi-objective optimization problems. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 10(1):50–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowles J, Nakayama H (2008) Meta-modeling in multiobjective optimization. In: Branke J, Deb K, Miettinen K, Słowiński R (eds) Multiobjective optimization, Vol. 5252. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp 245–284

  • Koutsoyiannis D (2000) A generalized mathematical framework for stochastic simulation and forecast of hydrologic time series. Water Resour Res 36(6):1519–1533. doi:10.1029/2000WR900044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koutsoyiannis D (2005) Stochastic simulation of hydrosystems water encyclopedia. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

  • Koutsoyiannis D (2011) Hurst-kolmogorov dynamics and uncertainty. JAWRA J Am Water Resour Assoc 47(3):481–495. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00543.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koutsoyiannis D, Economou A (2003) Evaluation of the parameterization-simulation-optimization approach for the control of reservoir systems. Water Resour Res 39(6):1170. doi:10.1029/2003WR002148

    Google Scholar 

  • Krige DG (1951) A statistical approach to some basic mine valuation problems on the Witwatersrand. J Chem Metall Min Eng Soc S Afr 52(6):119–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Labadie JW (2004) Optimal operation of multireservoir systems: state-of-the-art review. J Water Resour Plan Manag Asce 130(2):93–111. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(2004)130:2(93)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson S, Larson S (2007) Index-based tool for preliminary ranking of social and environmental impacts of hydropower and storage reservoirs. Energy 32(6):943–947. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2006.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lophaven SN, Nielsen HB, Sondergaard J (2002) Aspects of the Matlab toolbox DACE IMM-REP-2002-13, Informatics and Mathematical Modelling : DTU, pp. 44

  • Makropoulos CK, Butler D (2005) A multi-objective evolutionary programming approach to the ‘object location’ spatial analysis and optimisation problem within the urban water management domain. Civ Eng Environ Syst 22(2):85–101. doi:10.1080/10286600500126280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash J, Sutcliffe J (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10(3):282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicklow J, Reed P, Savic D, Dessalegne T, Harrell L, Chan-Hilton A, Evolutionary ATC (2010) State of the art for genetic algorithms and beyond in water resources planning and management. J Water Resour Plan Manag Asce 136(4):412–432. doi:10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira R, Loucks DP (1997) Operating rules for multireservoir systems. Water Resour Res 33(4):839–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paraskevopoulos – Pangaea (1994) Environmental impact assessment for the wider region of the Greek Nestos River Basin

  • Press W, Teukolsky S, Vetterling W, Flannery B (1992) Numerical recipes in C: the art of scientific computing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Razavi S, Tolson BA, Burn DH (2012a) Numerical assessment of metamodelling strategies in computationally intensive optimization. Environ Model Softw 34:67–86. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.09.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razavi S, Tolson BA, Burn DH (2012b) Review of surrogate modeling in water resources. Water Resour Res 48(7):W07401. doi:10.1029/2011WR011527

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed PM, Hadka D, Herman JD, Kasprzyk JR, Kollat JB (2013) Evolutionary multiobjective optimization in water resources: the past, present, and future. Adv Water Resour 51:438–456. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacks J, Welch W, Mitchell T, Wynn H (1989) Design and analysis of computer experiments (with discussion). J Stat Sci 4:409–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonovic SP (1992) Reservoir systems-analysis - closing gap between theory and practice. J Water Resour Plan Manag Asce 118(3):262–280. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(1992)118:3(262)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skoulikaris C, Monget M, Ganoulis J (2008) Climate change impacts on dams projects on transboundary river basins. The case of Mesta/Nestos river basin, Greece. Paper presented at the IV International Symposium on Transboundary Waters Management, Thessaloniki

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukalas I, Makropoulos C (2013) Hydrosystem optimization with the use of evolutionary algorithms: the case of Nestos river. Paper presented at the 13th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukalas I, Makropoulos C (2014) Multiobjective optimisation on a budget: exploring surrogate modelling for robust multi-reservoir rules generation under hydrological uncertainty. Environ Model Softw. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.09.023

    Google Scholar 

  • Vink K, Schot P (2002) Multiple-objective optimisation of drinking water production strategies using a genetic algorithm. Water Resour Res 38(9):1181

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates D, Sieber J, Purkey D, Huber-Lee A (2005) WEAP21: a demand, priority, and preference driver water planning model. Part 1: model characteristics. Water Int 30:487–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • YDE (1954) Nestos diversion dam, Macedonia, Greece, Basis of design on the Nestos diversion dam Knappen-Tippetts-Abbett-McCarthy engineers. Library of Technical Chamber of Greece, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh WWG (1985) Reservoir managment and operations models - a state-of-the-art review. Water Resour Res 21(12):1797–1818. doi:10.1029/WR021i012p01797

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was undertaken within the project “Investigation of climate change in Greece and its impact on the sustainability of projects dealing with hydroelectric power and the agricultural economy: Application in the Nestos river basin d KLIMENESTOS” which was financed by the Greek Ministry of Education, Lifelong Learning and Religious Affairs, General Secretariat for Research and Technology, through the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF) 2007–2013 and under the operational programmes “Competitiveness and Entrepreneurship and Regions in Transition”, within the National Action “Cooperation 2009”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Civil Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Heroon Polytechneiou 5, Athens, 157 80, Greece

    I. Tsoukalas & C. Makropoulos

Authors
  1. I. Tsoukalas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. Makropoulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Tsoukalas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsoukalas, I., Makropoulos, C. A Surrogate Based Optimization Approach for the Development of Uncertainty-Aware Reservoir Operational Rules: the Case of Nestos Hydrosystem. Water Resour Manage 29, 4719–4734 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1086-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1086-8

Keywords