Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Impact of Flood Spreading on Infiltration Rate and Soil Properties in an Arid Environment

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Flood spreading (FS) is one of the suitable methods for flood management and water harvesting that increases the groundwater recharge, makes soil more fertile and increases nutrients in soil. It is also a method for reusing sediment, which is usually wasted. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of flood spreading on physical and chemical soil properties (soil texture, infiltration rate, pH, EC, Na, P, K, Ca, Mg, Cl, HCO3, and SO4). It is examined that the soil properties change in the flood spreading projection area (FSP). The physico-chemical properties of soil and infiltration rate were measured in different soil depths at both flood spreading and control area. For the 20 cm of top soil, the amount of clay increased after the flood spreading implementation especially in the first and second dikes. Increasing clay was accompanied by decreasing soil infiltration and sand percentage. The mean differences of the clay, sand and infiltration rate between FSP and the control area were statistically significant (P < 0.01). A significant difference was not observed in 20–30 cm of the depth. Soil pH, Mg, HCO3, Cl and SO4 in different soil layers did not show any significant difference between the control and FSP. Soil EC in 0–20 cm depth of FSP and control area was showed a significant difference (P < 0.05) but no significant differences were found in deeper layers (P < 0.05). K, Na and Ca were remarkably different between 0 and 10 cm depths (P < 0.05) whereas no significant differences were found in deeper layers (P < 0.05). Comparison of the physico-chemical properties and infiltration rates between the dikes in the FSP shows that there are the significant differences between the medians of dike 1 with dikes 2, 3, 4 and 5, but the differences were not observed between dikes 3, 4 and 5. Our results show that the flood spreading operation can be influenced by the area that is under this operation. This study allowed us to investigate the mechanisms that regulate the infiltration rate and chemical soil properties throughout a seasonally flooded area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Artimo A, Sami S, Ylander I (2008) Methods for integrating an extensive geodatabase with 3D modeling and data management tools for the Virttaankangas Artificial Recharge Project, Southwestern Finland. Water Resour Manage 22(120):1723–1739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Qudah KH, Abu-Jabe N (2009) A GIS database for sustainable management of shallow water resources in the Tulul al Ashaqif Region, NE Jordan. Water Resour Manag 23(3):603–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arabkhedri MA, Sarreshtehdari A, Kamali K (1997) The long time effect of flood harvesting on infiltration rate. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on rainwater catchment system, vol 2. Ministry of Jihad-e-Sazandegi, Tehran, pp 1157–1158

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulton AJ (2000) River ecosystem health down under: assessing ecological condition in riverine groundwater zones in Australia. Ecosyst Health 6(2):108–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulton AJ, Findlay S, Marmonier P, Stanley EH, Valett HM (1998) The functional significance of the hyporheic zone in streams and rivers. Ann Rev Ecolog Syst 29:59–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunke M, Gonser T (1997) The ecological significance of exchange processes between rivers and groundwater. Freshw Biol 37:1–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao W, Bowden WB, Tim Davie T, Fenemor A (2009) Modeling impacts of land cover change on critical water resources in the Motueka river catchment, New Zealand. Water Resour Manag 23:137–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhruva Narayana VV, Sastry G, Patnaik US (1990) Watershed management. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, p 176

    Google Scholar 

  • Fengxiang XH (2007) Biogeochemistry of trace elements in arid environments. Springer, Netherlands, p 355

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambrel RP, Patrick WH (1978) Chemical and microbiological properties of anaerobic soils and sediments. In: Hook DD, Crawford RMM (eds) Plant life in anaerobic environments. Ann Arbor Science, Mich pp 375–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta GN, Bala N, Choudhary KR (1995) Effect of run-off harvesting and conservation techniques on growth and biomass production of Prosopis cineraria. Indian For 121:702–710

    Google Scholar 

  • Haise HR, Donnan WW, Phelan JT, Lawhon LF, Shockley DG (1956) The use of cylinder infiltrometers to determine the intake characteristics of irrigated soils. Publ ARS 41-7, Agricultural Research Service and Soil Conservation Service, USDA, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondolf GM, Maloney LM, Williams JG (1987) Effects of bank storage and well pumping on base flow, Carmel River, Monterey County, California. J Hydrol 91:351–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowsar A (1992) Desertification control floodwater spreading in Iran. Unasylva 43:27–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnunsson T (1992) Studies of the soil atmosphere and related physical site characteristics in mineral forest soils. J Soil Sci 43:767–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnunsson T (1994) Studies of the soil atmosphere and related physical site characteristics in peat forests soils. For Ecol Manag 67:203–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nebel G (2001) Sustainable land-use in Peruvian flood plain forests: options, planning and implementation. For Ecol Manag 150:187–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborn HB, Hickok RB (1968) Variability of rainfall affecting runoff from a semiarid rangeland watershed. Water Resour Res 4(1):199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborn HB, Renard KG, Simanton JR (1979) Dense networks to measure convective rainfall in the Southwestern United States. Water Resour Res 15(6):1701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oweis T, Prinz D, Hachum A (2001) Water harvesting. In: Indigenous knowledge for the future of drier environments. International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), Aleppo

  • Parissopoulos GA, Wheater HS (1990) Numerical study of the effects of layers on unsaturated saturated two-dimensional flow. Water Resour Manag 4:97–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parissopoulos GA, Wheater HS (1992) Experimental and numerical infiltration studies in a wadi stream bed. Hydrol Sci J 37:27–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterjohn WT, Correll DL (1984) Nutrient dynamics in agricultural watershed: observations on the role of a riparian forest. Ecology 65:1466–1475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilgrim DH, Chapman TG, Doran DG (1988) Problems of rainfall–runoff modelling in arid and semi-arid regions. Hydrol Sci J 33(4):379–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponnamperuma FN (1972) The chemistry of submerged soils. Adv Agron 24

  • Reij C, Mulder P, Begemann L (1988) Water harvesting for plant production 0-8213-1142-5. The World Bank, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Rejani R, Madan KJ, Panda SN, Mull R (2008) Simulation modeling for efficient groundwater management in Balasore Coastal Basin, India. Water Resour Manag 22(1):23–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renard KG, Keppel RV (1966) Hydrographs of ephemeral streams in the southwest. J Hydraul Div 92:33–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Rostagno CM (1989) Infiltration and sediment production as affected by soil surface condition in a shrubland of Patagonia, Argentina. J Range Manag 27:382–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schälchli U (1992) The clogging of coarse gravel riverbeds by fine sediment. Hydrobiologia 235/236:189–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas TR, Jaiswal K, Galkate R, Singh S (2009) Development of a rainfall–recharge relationship for a fractured basaltic aquifer in Central India. Water Resour Manag 23(15):3101–3119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toda Y, Ikeda S, Kumagai K, Asano T (2005) Effects of flood flow on flood plain soil and riparian vegetation in a Gravel River. J Hydrol Eng 131:950–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd GK (1995) Groundwater flow in relation to the flooding stream. Proc Am Soc Civ Eng 81(628):20–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger IM, Motavalli PP, Muzika RM (2009) Changes in soil chemical properties with flooding: a field laboratory approach. Agric Ecosyst Environ 131:105–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace DE, Renard KG (1967) Contribution to regional water table from transmission losses of ephemeral stream beds. Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 10:786–789

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis TM, Black AS, Meyer WS (1997) Estimates of deep percolation beneath cotton in the Macquarie Valley. Irrig Sci 17:141–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Range and Watershed Management, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

    Reza Ghazavi & Abbasali Vali

  2. Department of Water Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran

    Saeid Eslamian

Authors
  1. Reza Ghazavi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abbasali Vali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Saeid Eslamian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reza Ghazavi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ghazavi, R., Vali, A. & Eslamian, S. Impact of Flood Spreading on Infiltration Rate and Soil Properties in an Arid Environment. Water Resour Manage 24, 2781–2793 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9579-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9579-y

Keywords