Abstract
We developed an integrated biophysical and economic modeling framework to assess impact of various groundwater management options on seawater intrusion and waterlogging and ultimate impact on sugarcane profitability in a coastal region of North Queensland, Australia. The modelling framework used the output of a groundwater management flow model (waterlogged and seawater intruded areas) and a crop simulation model (simulated crop yield) and maximised the net revenue in a mathematical programming (optimisation) model. The framework determined the economically optimal level of water use on different soil types and in different management regimes and estimated impact of seawater intrusion and waterlogging on net revenue of growing sugarcane in two neighbouring water board areas (North Burdekin Water Board – NBWB and South Burdekin Water Board – SBWB). In NBWB, the predicted aggregate net revenue was highest ($19.95 million) when groundwater use was also highest (70%) while predicted aggregate net revenue was lowest when groundwater use was also lowest. In SBWB, the predicted aggregate net revenue was highest ($23 million) when groundwater use was relatively low (61%). The predicted aggregate net revenues of all the management options were higher in SBWB than NBWB.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ABARE (1996) Queensland Sugar Cane Industry 1993–94 to 1995–96: a report prepared for the Sugar Research and Development Corporation. Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Canberra
Anderson MP, Woessner WW (1991) Applied groundwater modeling: simulation of flow and advective transport. Academic, San Diego
Arunakumaren NJ, McMahon GA, Bajracharya K (2000) Water management in the Lower Burdekin: groundwater model conceptualisation, water assessment and planning, resource science and knowledge. Queensland Department of Natural Resources, Brisbane
Arunakumaren NJ, Bajracharya K, McMahon GA (2001) Water management in the Lower Burdekin, the Burdekin Delta Groundwater Model, water assessment and planning, resource science and knowledge. Queensland Department of Natural Resources, Brisbane
Azaiez MN (2002) A model for conjunctive use of ground and surface water with opportunity costs. Eur J Oper Res 143:611–624
Basagaoglu H, Marino M, Shumway RH (1999) Delta-form approximating problem for a conjunctive water resources management. Adv Water Resour 7:214–222
Beare S, Bell R, Gooday P, Heaney A, Hooper S, Langenkamp D, Love G, Mues C, Qureshi ME, Riley C (2003) Natural resource management in the Burdekin River Catchment: integrated assessment of resource management at the catchment scale – a case study, ABARE eReport 03.18, Canberra
Bonnis G, Steenblik R (1998) Water, agriculture and the environment, OECD Observer, June–July, No. 212
Bristow KL, Charlesworth PB, McMahon GA, Arunakumaren J, Bajracharya K, Ham G, Sutherland P, Laidlow G, Lowis B, Nielson G, Qureshi ME, Christianos N, Enderlin N, Eldridge S (2000) Towards a more integrated approach to water management in the Burdekin delta irrigation area, ANCID Conference Toowoomba
Bristow KL, Charlesworth PC, Narayan KA, Stewart LM, Cook FJ, Hopmans JW (2003) A Framework for improving water management in the Lower Burdekin. In: Post DA (ed) Proceedings of the MODSIM 2003 International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, vol. 2, pp. 206–211
Brooke A, Kendrick D, Meeraus A, Raman R (1998) GAMS: a user’s guide. GAMS Development Corporation, Washington, DC
BSES (1998) Irrigation of sugarcane. Bureau of Sugar Experiment Stations, Brisbane
Castle EN, Lindeborg KH (1961) Economics of groundwater allocation, Agriculture Experiment Station, Miscellaneous paper No. 108, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon
Charlesworth PB, Bristow K (2004) Sustainable Management of the Burdekin Delta Groundwater Systems, CSIRO Land and Water Client Report NPSI Project CLW32 – Final Report April
Charlesworth PB, Chin C, Bristow K, Ham G (2002) Healthy crop and healthy groundwater – sugarcane in the Burdekin delta. Proceedings of the Irrigation Association Australia Conference, Sydney, 21–23 May
Coe JJ (1990) Conjunctive use advantages, constraints, and examples. J Irrig Drain Eng 116:427–443
Connolly RD, Bell M, Huth N, Freebairn DM, Thomas G (2002) Simulating infiltration and the water balance in cropping systems with APSIM-SWIM. Aust J Soil Res 40:221–242
Kahlown MA, Azam M (2002) Individual and combined effect of waterlogging and salinity on crop yields in the Indus Basin. Irrig Drain 51:329–338
Keating BA, Robertson RC, Muchow RC, Huth NI (1999) Modelling sugarcane production systems I. Development and performance of the sugarcane module. Field Crops Res 61:253–271
Maddock T (1974) The operation of a stream–aquifer system under stochastic demands. Water Resour Res 10:1–10
McCown RL, Hammer GL, Hargreaves JNG, Holzworth DP, Freebairn DM (1996) APSIM: a novel software system for model development, model testing, and simulation in agricultural systems research. Agric Syst 50:255–271
McDonald MG, Harbaugh AW (1988) MODFLOW: a modular three dimensional finite difference ground water model. Open File Report 83-875, US Geological Survey, Washington
Mohan S, Jothiprakash V (2003) Development of priority-based policies for conjunctive use of surface and groundwater. Water Int 28:254–267
Muchow RC, Robertson MJ (1994) Relating crop nitrogen uptake to sugarcane yield. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Sugarcane Technology Conference, pp 122–130
Murphy SF, Sorensen RC (2001) Salt water intrusion in the Mackay coastal plains aquifer. In: Hogarth DM (ed) Proc. of the Australian Soc. of Sugar Cane Techno. Conf., 23, pp 70–76
O’Shea JA (1985) A review of the Burdekin Delta recharge scheme. Internal report, Water Resources Division, Water Resources Commission, Brisbane
Provencher B, Burt OR (1994) Approximating the optimal groundwater policy in a multi-aquifer stochastic conjunctive use setting. Water Resour Res 30:833–843
Pulido-Velaquez M, Andreu J, Sahuquillo A (2006) Economic optimisation of conjunctive use of surface water and groundwater at the basin scale. J Water Resour Plan Manage, 454–467, November–December
Qureshi ME, Harrison SR (2001) Economic evaluation of riparian revegetation options in North Queensland. In: Harrison SR, Herbohn J (eds) Tropical small scale forestry: social and economic issues and implications for policy development, chapter 12. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Qureshi ME, Wegener MK, Bristow KL, Mallawaarachchi T, Charlesworth PB (2001a) Economic evaluation of alternative irrigation practices for sugarcane production in the Burdekin Delta. In Proceedings of the Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society Conference. January 22–25, Adelaide
Qureshi ME, Wegener MK, Harrison SR, Bristow KL (2001b) Economic evaluation of alternative irrigation systems for sugarcane in the Burdekin delta in north Queensland, Australia. In: Brebbia CA, Anagnostopoulos P, Katsifarakis, K, Cheng AH-D (eds) Water resources management. WIT, Boston
Qureshi ME, Qureshi SE, Goesch T, Hafi A (2006) Preliminary economic assessment of groundwater extraction rules. Econ Pap 25:41–67
Small F (2000) Socio-economic costs and benefits of cane production in the Burdekin and Proserpine districts: growers survey report. Bureau of Sugar Experiment Station, Brandon, Qld
SK&M (1997) Burdekin river issues – 1996: technical issues. Sinclair Knight Mertz, Toowoomba
Wegener MK (1990) Agro-industrial crops. In Reid RL (ed) The manual of Australian agriculture, Ch. 6. Butterworths, Sydney, p 121
White DH (2001) The capability of crop models to simulate the physiological impact of water stress or waterlogging. National Program for Irrigation Research and Development, Canberra
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Qureshi, M.E., Qureshi, S.E., Bajracharya, K. et al. Integrated Biophysical and Economic ModellingFramework to Assess Impacts of Alternative Groundwater Management Options. Water Resour Manage 22, 321–341 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-007-9164-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-007-9164-1