Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of lower urinary tract conditions on surgical outcomes of different suburethral sling procedures for female stress urinary incontinence

  • Urology – Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The suburethral sling procedure has been widely used as the first-line treatment for female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). This study retrospectively compared the long-term surgical outcomes and complications between retropubic and transobturator suburethral sling procedures.

Methods

From 2010 to 2022, a total of 533 women with SUI underwent retropubic pubovaginal sling (PVS) or transobturator tape (TOT) procedures using a synthetic polypropylene mesh with or without concomitant anterior colporrhaphy. All patients underwent preoperative videourodynamic studies, Valsalva leak point pressure (VLPP), and voiding efficiency (VE). The success rate, postoperative complications, overactive bladder symptoms, transvaginal urethrolysis, and repeat procedures were compared among different surgical procedures.

Results

Among the patients, PVS was performed in 251 (47.1%) patients and with colporrhaphy in 58 (10.9%), TOT in 174 (32.6%) and with colporrhaphy in 50 (9.4%). The success rate was 87.4% in the PVS group and 75.4% in the TOT group, with or without colporrhaphy (p = 0.001). Urethrolysis was performed in 4.7% of the patients, and repeat suburethral sling procedures were performed in 8.3%. The overall success rate was significantly lower in TOT group, either with high or low VLPP, or with high or low VE. The rate of persistent OAB was significantly higher in TOT group regardless of VLPP or VE, whereas patients with VE < 90% at baseline had a significantly higher rate of postoperative dysuria.

Conclusion

TOT procedures had an inferior long-term success rate than PVS procedures for female SUI. Additionally, no differences in the success rate were observed between patients with different bladder functions, high or low VLPP, and high or low VE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data of this study can be obtained after contacting the corresponmding authors aftert approval of the IRB of the institution.

References

  1. Kobashi KC, Vasavada S, Bloschichak A, Hermanson L, Kaczmarek J, Kim SK, Kirkby E, Malik R (2023) Updates to surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI): AUA/SUFU guideline. J Urol 209:1091–1098

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rechberger E, Wróbel A, Kulik-Rechberger B, Miotla P, Ziętek A, Rechberger T (2023) The clinical efficacy and safety of outside-in transobturator sling with additional paraurethral fixation—the prospective longitudinal study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 290:22–26

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kuo HC (2001) Comparison of video urodynamic results after the pubovaginal sling procedure using rectus fascia and polypropylene mesh for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 165:163–168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ong HL, Kuo HC (2019) Bladder dysfunction does not affect long-term success rate of the retropubic suburethral sling procedure in women with stress urinary incontinence. Low Urin Tract Symptoms 11:O168–O173

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu HH, Kuo HC (2019) Durability of retropubic suburethral sling procedure and predictors for successful treatment outcome in women with stress urinary incontinence. Urology 131:83–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chmaj-Wierzchowska K, Raba G, Dykczyński P, Wilczak M, Turlakiewicz K, Latańska I, Sujka W (2022) Clinical outcomes of mid-urethral sling (MUS) procedures for the treatment of female urinary incontinence: a multicenter study. J Clin Med 11:6656

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Farag F, Osman NI, Pang KH, Castro-Diaz D, Chapple CR, Cruz F, Gamé X, Goldman H, Greenwell T, Hampel C, Scailteux LM, Roovers JP, Welk B, Heesakkers J (2023) Complications of synthetic midurethral slings: is there a relevant discrepancy between observational data and clinical trials? Eur Urol Focus S2405-4569(23):00244–00254

    Google Scholar 

  8. O’Leary BD, McCreery A, Redmond AE, Keane DP (2023) The efficacy and complications of retropubic tension-free vaginal tapes after 20 years: a prospective observational study. BJOG 130:107–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Padoa A, Levy E, Fligelman T, Tomashev-Dinkovich R, Tsviban A, Serati M (2023) Predictors of persistent overactive bladder following surgery for advanced pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 34:759–767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Six JC, Pinsard M, Guerin S, Gasmi A, Coiffic J, Richard C, Haudebert C, Nyangoh Timoh K, Hascoet J, Peyronnet B (2023) Risk factors for stress urinary incontinence recurrence after midurethral sling revision. Int J Urol 30:1008–1013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ozkurkcugil C, Avci IE (2023) Factors predicting treatment success in mixed urinary incontinence treated with midurethral sling. Low Urin Tract Symptoms 15:50–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee PJ, Kuo HC (2023) Low detrusor contractility has a less favorable outcome of anti-incontinence surgery for women with stress urinary incontinence. Int Urol Nephrol 55:2789–2798

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu SY, Kuo HC (2019) Long-term outcomes of anti-incontinence surgery and subsequent transvaginal sling incision for urethral obstruction. Int Urogynecol J 30:761–766

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rosier PFWM, Gammie A, Valdevenito JP, Speich J, Smith P, Sinha S, Members of the ICS working group PFS23 (2023) ICS-SUFU standard: theory, terms, and recommendations for pressure-flow studies performance, analysis, and reporting .Part 2: analysis of PFS, reporting and diagnosis. Neurourol Urodyn 42(7):1603–1627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuo HC (2001) Anatomical and functional results of pubovaginal sling procedure using polypropylene mesh for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 166:152–157

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ahmed AA, Abdellatif AH, El-Helaly HA, Tagreda IA, El-Feky MM, Agha MM, Abdelraouf AG, Abdelrahim AF (2020) Concomitant transobturator tape and anterior colporrhaphy versus transobturator subvesical mesh for cystocele-associated stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 31:1633–1640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ong HL, Jiang YH, Kuo HC (2019) Repeat retropubic suburethral sling procedure is effective for recurrent female stress urinary incontinence. Low Urin Tract Symptoms 11:O89–O92

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kuo HC (2005) Long-term surgical results of pubovaginal sling procedure using polypropylene mesh in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Urol Int 74:147–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Goessens EMV, Cammu H (2023) A 10- to 20-year follow-up after tension-free vaginal tape for stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 34:2107–2114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zilberlicht A, Karmakar D, DwyeR PL, Murray C, Kugelman N (2023) Predictors of surgical failure of open burch colposuspension versus retropubic midurethral sling for stress urinary incontinence. Urology 177:69–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Solhaug BR, Nyhus MØ, Svenningsen R, Vølloyhaug I (2023) Rates of subjective and objective cure, satisfaction, and pain 10-20 years after tension free vaginal tape (TVT) surgery: a retrospective cohort study. BJOG. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Salo H, Sova H, Laru J, Talvensaari-Mattila A, Nyyssönen V, Santala M, Piltonen T, Koivurova S, Rossi H-R (2023) Long-term results of a prospective randomized trial comparing tension-free vaginal tape versus transobturator tape in stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 34:2249–2256

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Alexandridis V, Lundmark Drca A, Ek M, Westergren Söderberg M, Andrada Hamer M, Teleman P (2023) Retropubic slings are more efficient than transobturator at 10-year follow-up: a swedish register-based study. Int Urogynecol J 34:1307–1315

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Kuo HC (2007) Effect of detrusor function on the therapeutic outcome of a suburethral sling procedure using a polypropylene sling for stress urinary incontinence in women. Scand J Urol Nephrol 41:138–143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen YC, Chen HW, Kuo HC (2023) Bladder neck incompetence could be an etiology of overactive bladder syndrome in women with stress urinary incontinence after anti-incontinence surgery: insights from transrectal sonography. World J Urol 41:3083–3089

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jiang YH, Wang CC, Chuang FC, Ke QS, Kuo HC (2013) Positioning of a suburethral sling at the bladder neck is associated with a higher recurrence rate of stress urinary incontinence. J Ultrasound Med 32:239–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chai TC, Huang L, Kenton K, Richter HE, Baker J, Kraus S, Litman H (2012) Urinary incontinence treatment network (UITN) association of baseline urodynamic measures of urethral function with clinical, demographic and other urodynamic variables in women prior to undergoing midurethral sling surgery. Neurourol Urodyn 31:496–501

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Serna-Gallegos T, Dutta S, Crowder C, Wadensweiler P, Whitcomb EL, Guaderrama NM (2024) Risk factors for de novo overactive bladder after midurethral sling. Urogynecol (Phila) 30:59–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ross J, Avvakoumova L, Yassein A, Payne M, Maciejewski C, Mallick R, Breau RH, Vigil H, Hickling D (2023) Prevalence and predictors of bladder outlet obstruction in women with chronic urinary symptoms and a history of urethral sling surgery. J Urol 209(2):384–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Morán Pascual E, Zabalo A, Colet Guitert O, Bonillo MÁ, Martínez-Cuenca E, Broseta Rico E, Budía A, Arlandis S (2023) Is detrusor underactivity associated with voiding dysfunction after single incision sling surgery? Minerva Urol Nephrol 75:642–648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Juhl C, Thimm MH, Glavind K (2023) Impact on urinary incontinence after management of complications related to a retropubic midurethral sling. Int Urogynecol J 34:2767–2774

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the grant from Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, grant number TCMF-MP 110-03-01 and TCMF-SP 112-01.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Yuan-Hong Jiang and Shenf-Fu Chen collect data and investigations Yuan-Hong Jiang wrote the draft manuscript Hann-Chorng Kuo supervised the study and revised the manuscript

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hann-Chorng Kuo.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, YH., Chen, SF. & Kuo, HC. Effect of lower urinary tract conditions on surgical outcomes of different suburethral sling procedures for female stress urinary incontinence. Int Urol Nephrol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-024-04047-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-024-04047-z

Keywords

Navigation