Skip to main content
Log in

Prognostic factors of first-line docetaxel treatment in castration-resistant prostate cancer: roles of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients from Northwestern China

  • Urology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the potential role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) with therapeutic response in patients who were treated with docetaxel for mCRPC.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data from 111 consecutive patients who were treated with docetaxel for mCRPC from 2009 to 2016 in a single center from Northwestern China. Pretreatment baseline and follow-up data including age, PSA response, Gleason score, and cycle number were reviewed, and multivariable Cox regression models and Kaplan–Meier analysis were used to predict overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

In Kaplan–Meier analyses, the NLR (optimal threshold 3.3), total PSA response, number of chemotherapy cycles, stage T, baseline of PSA, albumin, presence of visceral metastases, and PSA level at the diagnosis of cancer were significantly associated with OS, respectively. In multivariable analyses, higher NLR (>3.3), PSA level at the diagnosis of cancer (≥162 ng/ml), number of chemotherapy cycles, and albumin (<40.5 g/l) were associated with increased risk of death, respectively. Meanwhile, young age, higher NLR, number of chemotherapy cycles, presence of visceral metastases, and poor PSA response were associated with shorter PFS.

Conclusion

NLR combined with PSA level at the diagnosis of cancer remains an important prognostic marker in predicting therapeutic outcome in Chinese men who receive chemotherapy for mCRPC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2016) Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin 66(1):7–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD et al (2016) Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 66(2):115–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Feldman BJ, Feldman D (2001) The development of androgen-independent prostate cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 1(1):34–45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pezaro C, Attard G (2012) Prostate cancer in 2011: redefining the therapeutic landscape for CRPC. Nat Rev Urol 9(2):63–64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Petrylak DP, Tangen CM, Hussain MH et al (2004) Docetaxel and estramustine compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone for advanced refractory prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 351(15):1513–1520

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tannock IF, de Wit R, Berry WR et al (2004) Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 351(15):1502–1512

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Halabi S, Small EJ, Kantoff PW et al (2003) Prognostic model for predicting survival in men with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 21(7):1232–1237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Qu YY, Dai B, Kong YY et al (2013) Prognostic factors in Chinese patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with docetaxel-based chemotherapy. Asian J Androl 15(1):110–115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Smaletz O, Scher HI, Small EJ et al (2002) Nomogram for overall survival of patients with progressive metastatic prostate cancer after castration. J Clin Oncol 20(19):3972–3982

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang W, Meng Y, Liu N, Wen XF, Yang T (2015) Insights into chemoresistance of prostate cancer. Int J Biol Sci 11(10):1160–1170

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu K, Xie D, Zou Y et al (2013) The mechanism of DAB2IP in chemoresistance of prostate cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res 19(17):4740–4749

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Gu X, Gao X, Li X et al (2016) Prognostic significance of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in prostate cancer: evidence from 16,266 patients. Sci Rep 6:22089

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Tang L, Li X, Wang B et al (2016) Prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in localized and advanced prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 11(4):e153981

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jang WS, Cho KS, Kim KH et al (2016) Prognostic impact of preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio after radical prostatectomy in localized prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 19(3):298–304

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kawahara T, Fukui S, Sakamaki K et al (2015) Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts prostatic carcinoma in men undergoing needle biopsy. Oncotarget 6(31):32169–32176

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lorente D, Mateo J, Templeton AJ et al (2015) Baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is associated with survival and response to treatment with second-line chemotherapy for advanced prostate cancer independent of baseline steroid use. Ann Oncol 26(4):750–755

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Van Soest RJ, Templeton AJ, Vera-Badillo FE et al (2015) Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic biomarker for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy: data from two randomized phase III trials. Ann Oncol 26(4):743–749

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Conteduca V, Crabb SJ, Jones RJ et al (2016) Persistent neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio >3 during treatment with enzalutamide and clinical outcome in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer. PLoS ONE 11(7):e158952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Keizman D, Gottfried M, Ish-Shalom M et al (2012) Pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with ketoconazole: association with outcome and predictive nomogram. Oncologist 17(12):1508–1514

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Leibowitz-Amit R, Templeton AJ, Omlin A et al (2014) Clinical variables associated with PSA response to abiraterone acetate in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Ann Oncol 25(3):657–662

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Nuhn P, Vaghasia AM, Goyal J et al (2014) Association of pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with first-line docetaxel. BJU Int 114(6b):E11–E17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Sumbul AT, Sezer A, Abali H et al (2014) Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts PSA response, but not outcomes in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with docetaxel. Int Urol Nephrol 46(8):1531–1535

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lolli C, Caffo O, Scarpi E et al (2016) Systemic immune-inflammation index predicts the clinical outcome in patients with mCRPC treated with abiraterone. Front Pharmacol 7:376

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Li YF, Zhang SF, Zhang TT et al (2013) Intermittent tri-weekly docetaxel plus bicalutamide in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer: a single-arm prospective study using a historical control for comparison. Asian J Androl 15(6):773–779

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Roxburgh CS, McMillan DC (2010) Role of systemic inflammatory response in predicting survival in patients with primary operable cancer. Future Oncol 6(1):149–163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC 81202014 to KW, NSFC 81130041 to DH) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (to KW).

Author contributions

DLH, KJW, and XQP designed the study, analyzed, and interpreted the clinical data, wrote, and revised the manuscript. XQP, GT, WL, YMJ, DPW and JHF collected the clinical data and engaged in patient follow-up. DLH and KJW supervised the project and revised the manuscript. All the listed authors have participated actively in the study and approved the submitted manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Da-lin He or Kai-jie Wu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University and the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 12 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pei, Xq., He, Dl., Tian, G. et al. Prognostic factors of first-line docetaxel treatment in castration-resistant prostate cancer: roles of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients from Northwestern China. Int Urol Nephrol 49, 629–635 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-017-1524-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-017-1524-z

Keywords

Navigation