Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Do the different types of renal surgery impact the quality of life in the postoperative period?

  • Urology – Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Because more than 70 % of patients with localized tumors experience 10 years of cancer-specific survival, their quality of life (QoL) after surgery is important. The aim of this study was to explore the impact of the type of surgery (partial vs. total nephrectomy) and the postoperative outcome on the QoL of patients with renal cancer.

Methods

A total of 205 patients underwent partial or total nephrectomy at the Department of Urology, Roskilde Hospital, between February 2008 and June 2013 and survived until the time of the survey. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) was sent to this cohort in January 2014.

Results

The response rate was 74.1 % for complete answers. The overall global health status (QoL) was low (69.12 %) for all patient groups, regardless of the operation technique and the underlying medical status. Total nephrectomy was a negative predictor of QoL, physical functioning, role functioning, and fatigue. Patients who experienced recurrence reported significant deterioration in 11 of the 15 EORTC QLQ-C30 domains. Additionally, thinking about cancer only during the follow-up visit was associated with a significant decrease in emotional functioning and role functioning compared with never thinking about one’s cancer.

Conclusion

Total nephrectomy was a negative predictor of overall global health status. There is a demand for a reasonable follow-up program with an individual control interval according to the risk of recurrence and the possibility of treatment as well as the patient’s discretion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

QoL:

Quality of life

CKD:

Chronic kidney disease

e-GFR:

Estimated glomerular filtration rate

ECOG:

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance

EORTC QLQ-C30:

European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire 30

GH-QoL:

Global health and QoL scale

RQRC:

The rehabilitation questionnaire for renal cancer

RQRC1:

Have you at any time in the treatment course felt sick?

RQRC2:

Have you ever thought of yourself as a cancer patient?

RQRC3:

Have you ever thought of cancer recurrence in your treatment course?

RQRC4:

Do you think that you have had a complicated course after surgery?

RQRC5:

How do you see your body after surgery for kidney cancer?

RQRC6:

How often do you think about the fact that you have had kidney cancer?

RQRC7:

Are you satisfied with your treatment course?

OT:

Operations period

References

  1. Ljungberg B, Cowan NC, Hanbury DC et al EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2014 update. Uroweb 2014. http://www.uroweb.org/gls/pdf/10%20Renal%20Cell%20Carcinoma_LR.pdf

  2. Karakiewicz PI, Briganti A, Chun FK et al (2007) Multi-institutional validation of a new renal cancer-specific survival nomogram. J Clin Oncol 25:1316–1322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pannek J, Hallner D, Kugler J et al (1997) Quality of life of patients with renal cell carcinoma or prostate cancer after radical surgery. Int Urol Nephrol 29:637–643

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Clark PE, Schover LR, Uzzo RG et al (2001) Quality of life and psychological adaptation after surgical treatment for localized renal cell carcinoma: impact of the amount of remaining renal tissue. Urology 57:252–256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH et al (2009) A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 150:604–612

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC et al (1982) Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 5:649–655

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B et al (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:365–376

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cull AM (1997) Cancer-specific quality of life questionnaires: the state of the art in Europe. Eur J Cancer 33(Suppl 6):S3–S7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Seibaek L, Petersen LK (2005) Self-evaluated health status after cervical cancer surgery. Ugeskr Laeger 167:1517–1520

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Weight CJ, Larson BT, Fergany AF et al (2010) Nephrectomy induced chronic renal insufficiency is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular death and death from any cause in patients with localized cT1b renal masses. J Urol 183:1317–1323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nessn H. Azawi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Azawi, N.H., Tesfalem, H., Dahl, C. et al. Do the different types of renal surgery impact the quality of life in the postoperative period?. Int Urol Nephrol 47, 263–269 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-014-0893-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-014-0893-9

Keywords

Navigation