Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Farm, household, and farmer characteristics associated with changes in management practices and technology adoption among dairy smallholders

  • Regular Articles
  • Published:
Tropical Animal Health and Production Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study explored whether technology adoption and changes in management practices were associated with farm structure, household, and farmer characteristics and to identify processes that may foster productivity and sustainability of small-scale dairy farming in the central highlands of Mexico. Factor analysis of survey data from 44 smallholders identified three factors—related to farm size, farmer’s engagement, and household structure—that explained 70 % of cumulative variance. The subsequent hierarchical cluster analysis yielded three clusters. Cluster 1 included the most senior farmers with fewest years of education but greatest years of experience. Cluster 2 included farmers who reported access to extension, cooperative services, and more management changes. Cluster 2 obtained 25 and 35 % more milk than farmers in clusters 1 and 3, respectively. Cluster 3 included the youngest farmers, with most years of education and greatest availability of family labor. Access to a network and membership in a community of peers appeared as important contributors to success. Smallholders gravitated towards easy to implement technologies that have immediate benefits. Nonusers of high investment technologies found them unaffordable because of cost, insufficient farm size, and lack of knowledge or reliable electricity. Multivariate analysis may be a useful tool in planning extension activities and organizing channels of communication to effectively target farmers with varying needs, constraints, and motivations for change and in identifying farmers who may exemplify models of change for others who manage farms that are structurally similar but performing at a lower level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bernués, A. and Herrero, M., 2008. Farm intensification and drivers of technology adoption in mixed dairy-crop systems in Santa Cruz, Bolivia. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 6, 279–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. and Cramer, D., 2011. Quantitative data analysis with IBM SPSS 17, 18 and 19, A Guide for Social Scientists. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byerlee, D., De Janvry, A. and Sadoulet, E., 2009. Agriculture for development: Toward a new paradigm. Annual Review of Resource Economics 1, 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuevas-Reyes, V., Baca del Moral, J., Cervantes-Escoto, F., Espinosa-García, J. A., Aguilar-Ávila, J. And Loaiza-Meza, A., 2013. Factors which determine use of innovations technology in dual porpouse cattle production units in Sinaloa, Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Pecuearias 4, 31–46.

  • Espinoza-Ortega, A., Espinosa-Ayala, E., Bastida-López, J., Castañeda-Martínez, T. and Arriaga-Jordán, C. M., 2007. Small-scale dairy farming in the highlands of Central Mexico: Technical, economic and social aspects and their impact on poverty. Experimental Agriculture 43, 241–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fadul-Pacheco, L., Wattiaux, M. A., Espinoza-Ortega, A., Sanchez-Vera, E. and Arriaga-Jordán, C.M., 2013. Evaluation of sustainability of smallholder dairy production systems in the highland of Mexico during rainy season. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 37, 882–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, A., 2013. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. 4th ed. SAGE Publications. Great Britain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greiner, R., Patterson, L. and Miller, O., 2009. Motivations, risk perceptions and adoption of conservation practices by farmers. Agricultural Systems 99, 86–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F, Black, W. C., Tatham, R. L. and Anderson, R. E., 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed. Prentice Hall International. London, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrero, M., Grace, D., Njuki, J., Johnson, N., Enahoro, D., Silvestri, S. and Rufino, M .C., 2012. The roles of livestock in developing countries. Animal, null, 1–16.

  • Leeuwis, C. and Aarts, N., 2011. Rethinking communication in innovation processes: Creating space for change in complex systems. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 17, 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-García, C. G., 2011. Factors influencing adoption of crop and forage related and animal husbandry technologies by small-scale dairy farmers in the highlands of Central Mexico. Ph.D. Thesis degree. School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, United Kingdom.

  • Martínez-García, C. G., Dorward, P. and Rehman, T., 2012. Farm and socioeconomic characteristics of small-holder milk producers and their influence on the technology adoption in Central Mexico. Tropical Animal Health and Production 44, 1199–1211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-García, C. G., Dorward P. and Rehman, T. 2013. Factors influencing adoption of improved grassland management by small-scale dairy farmers in Central Mexico and the implications for future research on smallholder adoption in developing countries. Livestock Science 152, 228–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan-Davies, C. Waterhouse, T. and Wilson R. 2012. Characterization of farmers’ responses to policy reforms in Scottish hill farming areas. Small Ruminant Research 102, 96–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thi, M. T., Larsen, S. C. E. and Neef, A., 2010. Challenges to institutionalizing participatory extension: The case of farmer livestock school in Vietnam. Journal of Agriculture Education and Extension 16, 179–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, W. P. and Burke J. R., 2011. Dictionary of Statistics and Methodology: A Non-Technical Guide for the Social Sciences. 4th ed. Sage publications. United States of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wattiaux, M. A., Blazek, J. and Olmos-Colmenero, J., 2012. Bird’s eye view of the Mexican dairy industry and on-the-ground assessment of production systems in the Highlands (Los Altos) of Jalisco, Mexico. Discussion Paper No 2012–2. Babcock Institute for International Dairy Research and Development, University of Wisconsin Madison, WI.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge all participating farmers for their hospitality and full support and the financial support of the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT) for post-doctoral grant 161330 and USDA International Science and Education grant 2009–01029.

Conflict of interest

The authors confirm that they have no conflicts of interest, and no part of it is submitted anywhere else for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos Galdino Martínez-García.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martínez-García, C.G., Ugoretz, S.J., Arriaga-Jordán, C.M. et al. Farm, household, and farmer characteristics associated with changes in management practices and technology adoption among dairy smallholders. Trop Anim Health Prod 47, 311–316 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-014-0720-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-014-0720-4

Keywords

Navigation