Abstract
A deterministic approach was used to compare breeding strategies utilizing local and imported semen for improvement of dairy cattle in Kenya. The local selection programs considered were a closed progeny testing scheme (CPT) and a young bull system progeny of local bulls (PLB). The continuous semen importation (CSI) and young bull system progeny of imported bulls (PIB) were the strategies based on imports. The breeding strategies were compared on the basis of selection response. The effect of genetic correlation (r g) and initial differences in genetic merit between the two populations was also examined. The CSI and PIB strategies ranked above CPT by, correspondingly, 35.1% and 25.0% when the r g between Kenya and the USA was assumed to be one. At a r g of 0.58, imports from countries which are 1.50 standard deviation (SD) above the local population were superior to CPT but equal to PLB. This means that if CSI is to be used at a r g of 0.58, then only semen from countries which are >1.50SD should be imported. At a r g of 0.70 and with an initial genetic difference of 1.25SD, the economic responses in CSI and PLB were equal. This indicates that semen importation is only justified when genotype–environment interaction is >0.70. It is concluded that wholesale importation of semen as a means of achieving sustainable genetic progress in Kenya is a less optimal solution and there is the need for an effective local selection program.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CPT:
-
Closed progeny testing scheme
- CIS:
-
Continuous semen importation
- EV:
-
Economic values
- GE:
-
Genotype–environment interaction
- PLB:
-
Young bull system progeny of local bulls
- PIB:
-
Young bull system progeny of imported bulls
- rg :
-
Genetic correlation
References
Bebe, B.O., Udo H.M.J. and Thorpe, W., 2002. Development of smallholder dairy systems in the Kenya highlands, Outlook on Agriculture, 31, 113–120.
Bondoc, O.L., Smith, C. and Gibson, J.P., 1989. A review of breeding strategies for genetic improvement of dairy cattle in developing countries, Animal Breeding Abstracts, 10, 819–829.
Brascamp, E.W., 1978. Methods of Economic Optimization of Animal Breeding Plans. Rapport B-134, Instituut voor Veeteeltkundig Onderzoek, ‘Schoonoord’Zeist, The Neitherlands.
Gibson, J.P. and van Arendonk, J.A.M., 1998. Introduction to the design and economics of animal breeding strategies. Lecture notes. Post-graduate course. Warsaw Agricultural University, Poland. 259 pp.
Hazel, L.N., 1943. The genetic basis for constructing selection indices, Genetics, 28, 476–490.
Holstein USA., 2006. The new TPI index. http://www.holsteinusa.com/htm/newtpi.html. Accessed February, 2006.
Kahi, A.K. and Nitter, G. 2004. Developing breeding schemes for pasture based dairy production systems in Kenya. I. Derivation of economic values using profit functions, Livestock Production Science, 88, 161–177.
Kahi, A.K., Nitter, G. and Gall, C.F., 2004. Developing breeding schemes for pasture based dairy production systems in Kenya. II. Evaluation of alternative objectives and schemes using a two-tier open nucleus and the young bull system, Livestock Production Science, 88, 179–192.
Kosgey, I.S., Kahi, A.K. and van Arendonk, J.A.M., 2005. Evaluation of closed adult nucleus multiple ovulation and embryo transfer and conventional progeny testing breeding schemes for milk production in tropical crossbred cattle, Journal of Dairy Science, 88, 1582–1594.
Lôbo, R.H.B., Madalena, F.E. and Vieira, A.R., 2000. Average estimates of genetic parameters for beef and dairy cattle in tropical regions, Animal Breeding Abstracts, 68, 433–462.
Mpofu, N., Smith, C., van Vuuren, W. and Burnside, E.B., 1993. Breeding strategies for genetic improvement of dairy cattle in Zimbabwe. 1. Genetic evaluation, Journal of Dairy Science, 76, 1163–1172.
Mulder, H.A. and Bijma, P., 2006. Benefits of cooperation between breeding programs in the presence of genotype by environment interaction, Journal of Dairy Science, 89, 1727–1739.
Mulder, H.A., Veerkamp, R.F., Ducroc, B.J., van Arendonk, J.A.M. and Bijma, P., 2006. Optimization of dairy cattle breeding programs for different environments with genotype by environment interaction, Journal of Dairy Science, 89, 1740–1752.
Nicholson, C., Tambi, E., Staal, S.J. and Thorpe, W., 2001. Patterns of Change in Dairy Production and Consumption in Developing Countries from 1985 to 1990. Market-Oriented Smallholder Dairy Research Working Document No. 7, ILRI, Nairobi, Kenya, 73 pp.
Ojango, J.M.K. and Pollot, G.E., 2002. The relationship between Holstein bull breeding values for milk yield derived from both the UK and Kenya, Livestock Production Science, 74, 1–12.
Vargas, B. and van Arendonk, J.A.M., 2004. Genetic comparison of breeding schemes based on semen importation and local breeding schemes: framework and application to Costa Rica, Journal of Dairy Science, 87, 1496–1505.
Wilmink, J.B.M., Meijering, A. and Engel, B., 1986. Conversion of breeding values for milk from foreign populations, Livestock Production Science, 14, 223–229.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge Egerton University, Njoro, Kenya for provision of support and facilities.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Okeno, T.O., Kosgey, I.S. & Kahi, A.K. Genetic evaluation of breeding strategies for improvement of dairy cattle in Kenya. Trop Anim Health Prod 42, 1073–1079 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-010-9528-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-010-9528-z