Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reasoning with conditionals

  • Published:
Topoi Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reviews the psychological investigation of reasoning with conditionals, putting an emphasis on recent work. In the first part, a few methodological remarks are presented. In the second part, the main theories of deductive reasoning (mental rules, mental models, and the probabilistic approach) are considered in turn; their content is summarised and the semantics they assume for if and the way they explain formal conditional reasoning are discussed, in particular in the light of experimental work on the probability of conditionals. The last part presents the recent shift of interest towards the study of conditional reasoning in context, that is, with large knowledge bases and uncertain premises.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams E (1975) The logic of conditionals. Dordrecht, Reidel

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams E (1998) A primer of probability logic. CSLI Publications, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacchus F (1990) Representing and reasoning with probabilistic knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell VA, Johnson-Laird PN (1998) A model theory of modal reasoning. Cognit Sci 22:25–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnefon J-F, Hilton DJ (2004) Consequential conditionals: Invited and suppressed inferences from valued outcomes. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 30:28–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braine MDS, O’Brien DP (1991) A theory of IF: a lexical entry, reasoning program, and pragmatic principles. Psychol Rev 98:182–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braine MDS, O’Brien DP (1998) Mental logic. N. J. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Braine MDS, Reiser BJ, Rumain B (1984) Some empirical justification for a theory of natural propositional logic. In: Bower GH (ed) The psychology of learning and motivation, vol. 18. Academic Press, NY, pp 313–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne RMJ (1989) Suppressing valid inferences with conditionals. Cognition 31:61–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne RMJ, Johnson-Laird PN (1989) Spatial reasoning. J Mem Lang 28:564–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne RMJ, Espino O, Santamaria C (1999) Counterexamples and the suppression of interfaces. J Mem Lang 40:347–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chater N, Oaksford M (2000) The rational analysis of mind and behavior. Synthese 122:93–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins DD (1995) Naive theories and causal deduction. Mem Cognit 23:646–658

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins DD, Lubart T, Alksnis O, Rist R (1991) Conditional reasoning and causation. Mem Cognit 19:274–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Dancygier B (1998) Conditionals and prediction. Time, knowledge, and causation in conditional constructions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Da Silva Neves R, Bonnefon J-F, Raufaste E (2002) An empirical test of patterns for nonmonotonic inference. Annl Math Artif Intel 34:107–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delval JA, Rivière A (1975) “Si llueve, Elisa lleva sombrero”: Una investigacion psicologica sobre la tabla de verdad del condicional. Revista Psicologia General y Aplicada 30(136):825–850

    Google Scholar 

  • De Neys W, Schaeken W, d’Ydewalle G (2003) Inference suppression and semantic memory retrieval: every counterexample counts. Mem Cognit 31:581–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans J St BT (1972) Reasoning with negatives. Brit J Psychol 63:213–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans J St BT (1996) Deciding before you think: relevance and reasoning in the selection task. Brit J Psychol 87:223–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans J St BT, Legrenzi P, Girotto V (1999) The influence of linguistic form on reasoning: The case of matching bias. Quart J Exp Psychol 52A:185–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans J St BT, Handley SJ, Over DE (2003) Conditionals and conditional probability. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 29:321–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans J St BT, Over DE (2004) If. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillenbaum S (1975) A note on memory for sense: incidental recognition of warning phrased as conditionals, disjunctives, and conjunctives. Bull Psychon Soc 6:293–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillenbaum S (1976) Inducements: on the phrasing and logic of conditional promises, threats, and warnings. Psychol Res 38:231–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors P (1988) Knowledge in flux. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazdar G (1979) Pragmatics. Implicature, presupposition and logical form. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Geis ML, Zwicky AM (1971) On invited inferences. Linguist Inquiry 2:561–566

    Google Scholar 

  • George C (1995) The endorsement of the premises: assumption-based or belief-based reasoning. Brit J Psychol 86:93–111

    Google Scholar 

  • George C (1997) Reasoning from uncertain premises. Think Reason 3:161–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girotto V, Johnson-Laird PN (2004) The probability of conditionals. Psychologia 47:207–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grice HP (1975) Logic and conversation. In: Cole P, Morgan JL (eds) Syntax and semantics, vol 3, Speech acts, Academic Press, New York

  • Grice P (1989) Studies in the way of words. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hailperin T (1996) Sentential probability logic. Lehigh University Press, Bethlehem

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn LR (1989) A natural history of negation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird PN (1999) Deductive reasoning. Annl Rev Psychol 50:109–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird PN (2001) Mental models and deduction. Trends Cognit Sci 5:434–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird PN, Bara BG (1984) Syllogistic inference. Cognition 16:1–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird PN, Byrne RMJ (1991) Deduction. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hove

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird PN, Byrne RMJ (2002) Conditionals: a theory of meaning, pragmatics, and inference. Psychol Rev 109:646–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird PN, Tagart J (1969) How implication is understood. Amer J Psychol 82:367–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Josephson JR, Josephson SG (1994) Abductive inference. Computation, philosophy, technology, C.U.P, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus S, Lehmann D, Magidor M (1990) Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics. Artif Intel 44:167–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson SC (2000) Presumptive meanings. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu I-M, Lo K-C, Wu J-T (1996) A probabilistic interpretation of “If-Then”. Quart J Exp Psychol 49A:828–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnani L (2001) Abduction, reason, and science: processes of discovery and explanation. Kluwer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Manktelow K, Fairley N (2000) Superordinate principles in reasoning with causal and deontic conditionals. Think Reason 6:41–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noveck IA, Sperber D (2004) Experimental pragmatics. Palgrave McMillan, Houndmills

    Google Scholar 

  • Oaksford M Chater N (1991) Against logicist cognitive science. Mind Lang 6:1–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Oaksford M, Chater N (1994) A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection. Psychol Rev 101:608–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oaksford M, Chater N (2003a) Computational levels and conditional inference: Reply to Schroyens and Schaeken. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 29:150–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oaksford M, Chater N (2003b) Probabilities and pragmatics in conditional inference: suppression and order effects. In: Hardman D, Macchi L (eds) Thinking: psychological perspectives on reasoning, judgment and decision making. John Wiley, Chichester, pp 95–122

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Oaksford M, Chater N, Larkin J (2000) Probabilities and polarity biases in conditional inference. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 26:883–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oaksford M, Stenning K (1992) Reasoning with conditionals containing negated constituents. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 18:835–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberauer K, Weidenfeld A, Hörnig R (2004) Logical reasoning and probabilities: A comprehensive test of Oaksford and Chater (2001). Psychon Bull Rev 11:521–527

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberauer K, Wilhelm O (2003) The meaning(s) of conditionals: Conditional probabilities, mental models, and personal utilities. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 29:680–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Over DE, Hadjichristidis C, Evans J St BT, Handley SJ, Sloman SA (in press) The probability of ordinary indicative conditionals. Cognit Psychol

  • Paris SG (1973) Comprehension of language connectives and propositional logical relationships. J Exp Child Psychol 16:278–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearl J (1991) Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference, 2nd ed. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeifer N, Kleiter GD (in press) Inference in conditional probability logic. Kybernetica 40

  • Pfeifer N, Kleiter GD (2005a) Coherence and nonmonotonocity in human reasoning. Synthese 146:93–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeifer N, Kleiter GD (2005b) Towards a mental probability logic. Psychol Belgica 45:71–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Poletiek FH (2001) Hypothesis-testing behaviour. Psychology Press, Hove

    Google Scholar 

  • Politzer G (1981) Differences in interpretation of implication. Amer J Psychol 94:461–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Politzer G (2004) Reasoning, judgement and pragmatics. In: Noveck IN, Sperber D (eds) Experimental pragmatics, Palgrave, Houndmills, pp 94–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Politzer G (2005) Uncertainty and the suppression of inferences. Think Reason 11:5–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Politzer G, Bonnefon J-F (2006) Two varieties of conditionals and two types of defeaters help reveal two fundamental types of reasoning. Mind Lang 21:484–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Politzer G, Bourmaud G (2002) Deductive reasoning from uncertain conditionals. Brit J Psychol 93:345–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Politzer G, Braine MDS (1991) Responses to inconsistent premisses cannot count as suppression of valid inferences. Cognition 38:103–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Politzer G, Carles L (2001) Belief revision and uncertain reasoning. Think Reason 7:217–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Politzer G, Macchi L (2000) Reasoning and pragmatics. Mind Soc 1:73–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock JL (1987) Defeasable reasoning. Cognit Sci 11:481–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn S, Markovits H (1998) Conditional reasoning, causality, and the structure of semantic memory: strength of association as a predictive factor for content effects. Cognition 68:B93–B101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey FP (1931) General propositions and causality. In: Braithwaite RB (ed) The foundations of mathematics and other logical essays. Routledge, Kegan Paul, London, pp 237–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Rips LJ (1994) The psychology of proof. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumain B, Connell J, Braine MDS (1983) Conversational comprehension processes are responsible for reasoning fallacies in children as well as adults: If is not the biconditional. Develop Psychol 19:471–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholnick EK, Wing CS (1991) Speaking deductively: preschoolers’ use of If in conversation and in conditional inference. Develop Psychol 27:249–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholnick EK, Wing CS (1992) Speaking deductively: using conversation to trace the origins of conditional thought in children. Merrill-Palmer Quart 38:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroyens W, Schaeken W (2003) A critique of Oaksford, Chater, and Larkin’s (2000) conditional probability model of conditional reasoning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 29:140–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smets P (1998) (ed) Quantified representation of uncertainty and imprecision, vol. 1. In: Gabbay DM, Smets P (eds) Handbook of defeasible reasoning and uncertainty management systems. Dordrecht, Kluwer

  • Sperber D, Cara F, Girotto V (1995) Relevance theory explains the selection task. Cognition 57:31–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperber D, Wilson D (1986) Relevance: communication and cognition. Blackwell, London (2nd ed., 1995)

  • Stalnaker RC, Thomason RH (1970) A semantic analysis of conditional logic. Theoria 36:23–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenning K, Van Lambalgen M (2004) A litle logic goes a long way: basing experiment on semantic theory in the cognitive science of conditional reasoning. Cognit Sci 28:481–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenning K, Van Lambalgen M (2005) Semantic interpretation as computation in nonmonotonic logic: the real meaning of the suppression task. Cognit Sci 29:919–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson RJ, Over DE (1995) Deduction from uncertain premises. Quart J Exp Psychol 48A:613–643

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweetser E (1990) From etymology to pragmatics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomason RH (1970) A Fitch-style formulation of conditional logic. Logique Analyse 52:397–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson VA (1994) Interpretational factors in conditional reasoning. Mem Cognit 22:742–758

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson VA (1995) Conditional reasoning: the necessary and sufficient conditions. Can J Exp Psychol 49:1–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walton D (2004) Abductive reasoning. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa

    Google Scholar 

  • Wason PC (1966) Reasoning. In: Foss BM (ed) New horizons in psychology, vol. 1, Pelican Book

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CNRS, Institut Jean-Nicod, 1 bis, avenue de Lowendal, 75005, Paris, France

    Guy Politzer

Authors
  1. Guy Politzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guy Politzer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Politzer, G. Reasoning with conditionals. Topoi 26, 79–95 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-006-9001-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-006-9001-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation