Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Engaging faculty in service-learning: opportunities and barriers to promoting our public mission

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Tertiary Education and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Community engagement has been defined as a collaborative enterprise between higher education institutes and external communities where stakeholders can experience and benefit from a mutually beneficial knowledge exchange. A researcher examined a Research 1 university faculty’s perception of community engagement in the form of service-learning and implemented an online community of practice for faculty and community members to increase the faculty’s use of service-learning. The findings revealed that, although faculty see many benefits in implementing service-learning and report interest in learning about and using this pedagogy, service-learning practices are still considered an addition to faculty workloads rather than an integrated and expected role. The faculty reported concerns about the mixed messages within the institution around the value of their investment in this practice, including the lack of recognition in promotion and their feelings around professional obligations particularly related to research publications. Although faculty described teaching as equally important to research, they also perceived that the institution valued teaching and service as less important than research. Consistent with extant literature, this research provides evidence that community engagement activities need to be embedded in faculty roles and rewards to become institutionalized. Implications for practice and research will be discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abes, E. S., Jackson, G., & Jones, S. R. (2002). Factors that motivate and deter faculty use of service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 9, 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, W. A., Banerjee, U., Drennan, C. L., Elgin, S. C. R., Epstein, I. R., Handelsman, J., et al. (2011). Changing the culture of science education at research universities. Science, 331(6014), 152–153. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1198280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonio, A. L., Astin, H. S., & Cress, C. M. (2000). Community service in higher education: A look at the nation's faculty. The Review of Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2000.0015.

  • Banerjee, M., & Hausafus, C. O. (2007). Faculty use of service-learning: Perceptions, motivations, and impediments for the human sciences. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 14, 32–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E. (1994). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities for a new century. London: National Commission on Education and the Council for Industry and Higher Education, Paul Hamlyn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownell, S. E., & Tanner, K. D. (2012). Barriers to faculty pedagogical change: Lack of training, time, incentives, and…tensions with professional identity? CBE-Life Sciences Education. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-09-0163.

  • Butin, D. W. (2003). Of what use is it? Multiple conceptualizations of service learning within education. Teachers College Record. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-9620.2003.00305.x.

  • Butin, D. W. (2006). The limits of service-learning in higher education. The Review of Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2006.0025.

  • Campus Compact. (2013). Creating a culture of assessment: 2012 campus Compact annual member survey. Boston, MA: Author. Retrieved from https://compact.org/resource-posts/2012-annual-membership-survey/.

  • Carnegie Foundation. (2018). Carnegie community engagement classification. Retrieved from https://compact.org/initiatives/carnegie-community-engagement-classification/#Description

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, N. I., & Giles, D. E. (2000). Where’s the community in service-learning research? Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 7(1), 28–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, A. (2000). Carnegie’s community-engagement classification: Intentions and insights. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning. https://doi.org/10.3200/CHNG.40.1.38-41.

  • Eyler, J. (2002). Reflection: Linking service and learning--linking students and communities. Journal of Social Issues. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00274.

  • Fairweather, J. S., & Rhoades, R. A. (1995). Teaching and the faculty role: Enhancing the commitment to instruction in American colleges and universities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(2), 179–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, Y. (2016). Engaging and empowering academic staff to promote service-learning curriculum in research-intensive universities. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 20(3), 57–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felder, R. M. (2004). Teaching engineering at a research university: Problems and possibilities. Educación Química. https://doi.org/10.22201/fq.18708404e.2004.1.66214.

  • Finnegan, D. E. (1992). Academic career lines: A case study of faculty in two comprehensive universities (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.

  • Fitzgerald, H. E., Bruns, K., Sonka, S. T., Furco, A., & Swanson, L. (2016). The centrality of engagement in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 16(3), 7–28 (Original work published 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, B. A., Wasburn, M. H., Crispo, A. W., & Vandeveer, R. C. (2008). Teaching service learning: What’s in it for faculty at research universities? Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 12(4), 29–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furco, A., & Moely, B. E. (2012). Using learning communities to build faculty support for pedagogical innovation: A multi-campus study. The Journal of Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2012.0006.

  • Gay, G. (2002). Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102053002003.

  • Hill, M. F., & Haigh, M. A. (2012). Creating a culture of research in teacher education: Learning research within communities of practice. Studies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.559222.

  • Holland, B. A. (2006). Reflections on community-campus partnerships: What has been learned? What are the next challenges? In P. A. Pasque, R. E. Smerek, B. Dwyer, N. Bowman, & B. L. Mallory (Eds.), Higher education collaboratives for community engagement and improvement (pp. 10–17). Ann Arbor: National Forum on Higher Education for the Public Good.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou, S. I. (2010). Developing a faculty inventory measuring perceived service-learning benefits and barriers. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 16(2), 78–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou, S.-I., & Wilder, S. (2015). Changing pedagogy: Faculty adoption of service-learning: Motivations, barriers, and strategies among service-learning faculty at a public research institution. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015572283.

  • Jones, S. R., & Hill, K. (2001). Crossing high street: Understanding diversity through community service-learning. Journal of College Student Development, 42(3), 204–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, A. (1980). Why innovation fails: The institutionalization and termination of innovation in higher education. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, P. V., & Friedkin, N. E. (1994). Network studies of social influence. In S. Wasserman & J. Galaskiewicz (Eds.), Advances in social network analysis: Research in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 3–25). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McKay, V. C., & Rozee, P. D. (2004). Characteristics of faculty who adopt community service learning pedagogy. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 10(2), 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mink, T., & Twill, S. (2012). Using service-learning to teach a social work policy course. Journal of Community Engagement & Scholarship, 5(1).

  • Morgan, W., & Streb, M. (2001). Building citizenship: How student voice in service-learning develops civic values. Social Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1111/0038-4941.00014.

  • Nieto, S. (2006). Affirmation, solidarity and critique: Moving beyond tolerance in education. In E. Lee, D. Menkart, & M. Okazawa-Ray (Eds.), Beyond heroes and holidays: A practical guide to K–12 anti-racist, multicultural education and staff development (3rd ed., pp. 7–18). Washington, DC: Teaching for Change.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pataraia, N., Falconer, I., Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Fincher, S. (2014). Who do you talk to about your teaching?’: Networking activities among university teachers. Frontline Learning Research. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v2i2.89.

  • Rogers, E. M. (2004). A prospective and retrospective look at the diffusion model. Journal of Health Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730490271449.

  • Sandmann, L. R., & Weerts, D. J. (2008). Reshaping institutional boundaries to accommodate an engagement agenda. Innovation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-008-9077-9.

  • Seifer, S. D. (1998). Service-learning: Community-campus partnerships for health professions education. Academic Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199803000-00015.

  • Senge, P. M. (2000). The academy as learning community: Contradiction in terms or realizable future? In A. F. Lucas (Ed.), Leading academic change: Essential roles for department chairs (pp. 275–300). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Carnegie Classification of Institutions (2018). Basic classification description. Retrieved from http://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/classification_descriptions/basic.php.

  • The Johns Hopkins University Diversity Leadership Council (n.d.). Diversity wheel. Retrieved from http://web.jhu.edu/dlc/resources/diversity_wheel/index.html.

  • Thomson, K. E. (2013). The nature of academics’ informal conversation about teaching (unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Sydney, Australia.

  • Thomson, A. M., Smith-Tolken, A. R., Naidoo, A. V., & Bringle, R. G. (2010). Service learning and community engagement: A comparison of three national contexts. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-010-9133-9.

  • Tierney, W. G. (1988). Organizational culture in higher education: Defining the essentials. The Journal of Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.2307/1981868.

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weerts, D. J., & Sandmann, L. R. (2008). Building a two-way street: Challenges and opportunities for community engagement at research universities. The Review of Higher Education, 32(1), 73–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E., Trayner, B., & de Laat, M. (2011). Promoting and assessing value creation in communities and networks: A conceptual framework. The Netherlands: Ruud de Moor Centrum.

  • Wright, M. (2005). Always at odds? Congruence in faculty beliefs about teaching at a research university. The Journal of Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2005.11772285.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carey Borkoski.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Borkoski, C., Prosser, S.K. Engaging faculty in service-learning: opportunities and barriers to promoting our public mission. Tert Educ Manag 26, 39–55 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-019-09033-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-019-09033-0

Keywords

Navigation