Skip to main content
Log in

Canonical formulation of the embedded theory of gravity equivalent to Einstein’s general relativity

  • Published:
Theoretical and Mathematical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study the approach in which independent variables describing gravity are functions of the space-time embedding into a flat space of higher dimension. We formulate a canonical formalism for such a theory in a form that requires imposing additional constraints, which are a part of Einstein’s equations. As a result, we obtain a theory with an eight-parameter gauge symmetry. This theory becomes equivalent to Einstein’s general relativity either after partial gauge fixing or after rewriting the metric in the form that is invariant under the additional gauge transformations. We write the action for such a theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Janet, Ann. Soc. Pol. Math., 5, 38 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. Cartan, Ann. Soc. Pol. Math., 6, 1 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sh. Kobayashi and K. Nomizu, Foundations of Differential Geometry, Vols. 1, 2, Wiley, New York (1963, 1969).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Friedman, J. Math. Mech., 10, 625 (1961).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. T. Regge and C. Teitelboim, “General relativity a la string: A progress report,” in: Proc. 1st Marcel Grossmann Meeting on General Relativity (Trieste, Italy, 1975, R. Ruffini, ed.), North-Holland, Amsterdam (1977), p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. A. Paston and V. A. Franke, “The gravity as a theory of embedding of space-time into the flat space of higher dimensions,” in: Proc. 15th Intl. V. A. Fock School for Advances of Physics 2005 (V. Yu. Novozhilov, ed.), Publ. St. Petersburg State Univ., St. Petersburg (2006), p. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Deser, F. A. E. Pirani, and D. C. Robinson, Phys. Rev. D, 14, 3301 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. V. Tapia, Class. Q. Grav., 6, L49 (1989).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. R. Arnowitt, S. Deser, and C. W. Misner, “The dynamics of general relativity,” in: Gravitation: An Introduction to Current Research (L. Witten, ed.), Wiley, New York (1962), pp. 227; arXiv:gr-qc/0405109v1 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  10. V. A. Franke and V. Tapia, Nuovo Cimento B, 107, 611 (1992).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Pavsic and V. Tapia, “Resource letter on geometrical results for embeddings and branes,” arXiv:grqc/0010045v2 (2000).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. A. Paston.

Additional information

__________

Translated from Teoreticheskaya i Matematicheskaya Fizika, Vol. 153, No. 2, pp. 271–288, November, 2007.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paston, S.A., Franke, V.A. Canonical formulation of the embedded theory of gravity equivalent to Einstein’s general relativity. Theor Math Phys 153, 1582–1596 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11232-007-0134-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11232-007-0134-9

Keywords

Navigation