Skip to main content
Log in

From geometry to phenomenology

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Richard Tieszen [Tieszen, R. (2005). Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, LXX(1), 153–173.] has argued that the group-theoretical approach to modern geometry can be seen as a realization of Edmund Husserl’s view of eidetic intuition. In support of Tieszen’s claim, the present article discusses Husserl’s approach to geometry in 1886–1902. Husserl’s first detailed discussion of the concept of group and invariants under transformations takes place in his notes on Hilbert’s Memoir Ueber die Grundlagen der Geometrie that Hilbert wrote during the winter 1901–1902. Husserl’s interest in the Memoir is a continuation of his long-standing concern about analytic geometry and in particular Riemann and Helmholtz’s approach to geometry. Husserl favored a non-metrical approach to geometry; thus the topological nature of Hilbert’s Memoir must have been intriguing to him. The task of phenomenology is to describe the givenness of this logos, hence Husserl needed to develop the notion of eidetic intuition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bernays, P. (1967). Hilbert, David. Entry in the Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. Vol. 3. Edited Paul Edwards. New York: Macmillan & Free Press, London: Collier Macmillan, pp. 496–505.

  • Browder, F. E. (Ed.) (1976). Mathematical developments arising from Hilbert problems. Proceedings of symposia in pure mathematics, Vol. XXVIII, Part 1. Providence, Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society.

  • Dorier J.-L. (1995). A general outline of the genesis of vector space theory. Historia Mathematica 22: 227–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grassmann, H. (2000). Extension theory. Lloyd C. Kannenberg (transl.) American Mathematical Society, London Mathematical Society [1862].

  • Hartimo M. (2006). Mathematical roots of phenomenology: Husserl and the concept of number. History and Philosophy of Logic 27(4): 319–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartimo M. (2007) Towards completeness. Husserl on the theories of manifolds 1890–1901. Synthese 156(2): 281–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert D. (1903). Ueber die Grundlagen der Geometrie. Mathematische Annalen, 56, 381–422. English translation in Hilbert (1990), pp. 150–190.

  • Hilbert, D. (1990). Foundations of geometry. Translated from the 10th edition by Leo Unger. La Salle, Illinois: Open Court [1971].

  • Hilbert, D. (2004). David Hilbert’s lectures on the foundations of geometry, 1891–1902. Edited by Michael Hallett and Ulrich Majer. David Hilbert’s lectures on the foundations of mathematics and physics 1891–1933, Vol. 1. Berlin: Springer.

  • Husserl E. (1969) Formal and transcendental logic. Translated by Dorion Cairns. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl E. (1970) Philosophie der Arithmetik. Husserliana XII. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl E. (1974) Formale und transzendentale Logik. Husserliana XVII. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1975). Logische Untersuchungen. Erster Band. Prolegomena zur reinen Logik. Husserliana XVIII. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

  • Husserl, E. (1977). Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch: Allgemeine Einführungin die reine Phänomenologie 1. Halbband: Text der 1.-3. Auflage - Nachdruck. [Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy, first book: general introduction to a pure phenomenology. First half binding. Text of the 1–3 editions. Reprint.] Edited by Karl Schuhmann. The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.

  • Husserl, E. (1983). Studien zur Arithmetik und Geometrie. Texte aus dem Nachlass 1886–1901. Edited by Ingeborg Strohmeyer. Husserliana XXI. The Hague, Boston, Lancaster: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

  • Husserl, E. (1984). Logische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Band, Erster Teil. Husserliana XIX/1. The Hague, Boston, Lancaster: Martinus Nijhoff.

  • Husserl, E. (1994a). Early writings in the philosophy of logic and mathematics. Collected Works, Vol. V. Translated by Dallas Willard. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer.

  • Husserl E. (1994b) Briefwechsel, Band I Die Brentanoschule. Kluwer, Dordrecht, Boston, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1994c). Briefwechsel. Band V. Die Neukantianer. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer.

  • Husserl, E. (2001a). Logik. Vorlesung 1902/03. Husserliana Materialien Vol. 2. Edited by Elisabeth Schuhmann. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer.

  • Husserl, E. (2001b). Logical investigations. Vol. 1. Translated by J. N. Findlay. London, New York: Routledge [1970].

  • Husserl, E. (2003). Philosophy of arithmetic, psychological and logicl investigations with supplementary texts from 1887–1901. Translated by Dallas Willard. Collected Works X. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer.

  • Johnson D.M. (1979) The problem of the invariance of dimension in the growth of modern topology, Part I. Archive for History of Exact Sciences 20(2): 97–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, F. (1979). Development of mathematics in the 19th century. Translated by M. Ackerman. Massachusetts: Math Sci Press. Translation of Vorlesungen über die Entwicklung der Mathematik im 19 Jahrhundert. Teil I, Berlin [1928].

  • Russell, B. (1897). An essay on the foundations of geometry. London, Glasgow, Leipzig, New York, Bombay: Cambridge University Press.

  • Schuhmann, K. (1977). Husserl-Chronik. Denk- und Lebensweg Edmund Husserls. Husserliana Dokumente Vol. 1. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.

  • Schuhmann E., Schuhmann K. (2001) Husserls Manuskripte zu seinem Göttinger Doppelvortag von 1901. Husserl Studies 17: 87–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tappenden J. (1995) Geometry and generality in Frege’s philosophy of arithmetic. Synthese 102: 319–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tappenden, J. (2006). The Riemannian background to Frege’s philosophy. In Jeremy Gray & Jose Ferreiros (Eds.), The architecture of modern mathematics (pp. 107–150). Oxford University Press.

  • Tieszen R. (2005) Free variation and the intuition of geometric essences: Some reflections on phenomenology and modern geometry. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research LXX(1): 153–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torretti, R. (1978). Philosophy of geometry from Riemann to Poincaré. Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster: D. Reidel.

  • Weyl H. (1968) Gesammelte Abhandlungen, Band IV. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mirja Helena Hartimo.

Additional information

The author wishes to thank Academy of Finland for financial assistance that enabled her to work on this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hartimo, M.H. From geometry to phenomenology. Synthese 162, 225–233 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9177-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9177-6

Keywords

Navigation