Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Are you feeling successful?: Examining postsecondary student perceptions of success with an expectancy value theory lens

  • Published:
Social Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Expectancy Value Theory (EVT) is a prominent theory on student motivation. To add to the growing research in this area, we investigated students within a large, mandatory course outside of the STEM areas, to examine perceptions of success utilizing an EVT lens. The aim of our study was twofold. First, to examine students' open-ended responses about what makes them feel successful. Second, to determine if students’ indorsement of expectancy, value, and control could predict their feelings of success. The study consisted of 210 students who completed an online questionnaire with items related to demographics, EVT components, and questions about their success in the course. Deductive coding was utilized to examine their feelings of success based on the EVT components. Regression analysis was utilized to predict perceptions of success. Students identified several components of their course that were associated with expectancy, value, and cost. Students' perceptions of success were positively predicted by expectancy and negatively predicted by cost while value was not a significant predictor. Our results speak to the importance of expectancy, value, and cost when designing large, mandatory courses. We provided several recommendations for instructors when designing courses, and also highlight limitations and future research directions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig.1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainley, M., & Patrick, L. (2006). Measuring self-regulated learning processes through tracking patterns of student interaction with achievement activities. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 267–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9018-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, K. E., & Hulleman, C. S. (2015). Expectancy-value-cost model of motivation. In J. S. Eccles & K. Salmela-Aro (Eds.), International encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences: Motivational psychology. Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, A. S., Walmsley, P. T., Sackett, P. R., Kuncel, N. R., & Koch, A. J. (2015). The reliability of college grades. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 34(4), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookhart, S. M., Guskey, T. R., Bowers, A. J., McMillan, J. H., Smith, J. K., Smith, L. F., Stevens, L. F., Michael, T., & Welsh, M. E. (2016). A Century of Grading Research Meaning and Value in the Most Common Educational Measure. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1–79. http://uknowledge.uky.edu/edp_facpub

  • Canning, E. A., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2015). Teach it, don’t preach it: The differential effects of directly-communicated and self-generated utility value information. Motivation Science, 1, 47–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CAST. (2018). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.2. http://udlguidelines.cast.org

  • Daniels, L. M. (2019). From syllabus to final grades: A wrap-around workshop to support student motivation [Conference Workshop]. Canadian Society for Studies in Education, Vancouver, BC.

  • Dolbier, C. L., Webster, J. A., McCalister, K. T., Mallon, M. W., & Steinhardt, M. A. (2005). Reliability and validity of a single-item measure of job satisfaction. American Journal of Health Promotion, 19(3), 194–198. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-19.3.194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation. W.H Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective task value and the eccles et al model of achievement-related choices. In A. S. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation. Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents’ achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(3), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295213003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2020). From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flake, J. K., Barron, K. E., Hulleman, C., McCoach, B. D., & Welsh, M. E. (2015). Measuring cost: The forgotten component of expectancy-value theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 232–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaspard, H., Dicke, A.-L., Flunger, B., Schreier, B., Häfner, I., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2015). More value through greater differentiation: Gender differences in value beliefs about math. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 663–677. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goegan, L. D., Radil, A. I, Brooks, A. & Daniels L. M. (2020). Pre-service and practicing teachers’ perspectives on academic success: More than just a grade. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 25, 1–19. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/pare/vol25/iss1/10/.

  • Gogol, K., Brunner, M., Goetz, T., Martin, R., Ugen, S., Keller, U., Fischbach, A., & Preckel, F. (2014). “My questionnaire is too long!” The assessments of motivational-affective constructs with three-item and single-item measures. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(3), 188–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harackiewicz, J. M., Canning, E. A., Tibbetts, Y., Priniski, S. J., & Hyde, J. S. (2016). Closing achievement gaps with a utility-value intervention: Disentangling race and social class. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(5), 745–765. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulleman, C. S., Barron, K. E., Kosovich, J. J., & Lazowski, R. A. (2016). Student motivation: Current theories, constructs, and interventions within an expectancy-value framework. In Psychosocial skills and school systems in the 21st century. Springer, Cham.

  • Hulleman, C. S., Godes, O., Hendricks, B. L., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010a). Enhancing interest and performance with a utility value intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 880–895. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulleman, C. S., Kosovich, J. J., Barron, K. E., & Daniel, D. B. (2017). Making connections: Replicating and extending the utility value intervention in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(3), 387–404. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulleman, C. S., Schrager, S. M., Bodmann, S. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010b). A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: Different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels? Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, N., Lovett, S., Coba, L., Swingle, L. & Lindkvist, H. (2013). “What would make this a successful year for you?” How students define success in college. Liberal Education, 99(2), 1–11. http://repository.wellesley.edu/scholarship/3/.

  • Jiang, Y., Rosenzweig, E. Q., & Gaspard, H. (2018). An expectancy-value-cost approach in predicting adolescent students’ academic motivation and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 54, 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. L., & Safavian, N. (2016). What is cost and is it always a bad thing? Furthering the discussion concerning college-aged students’ perceived costs for their academic studies. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 15(3), 368–390. https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.15.3.368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, A. (2011). Teaching and Learning in Large Classes at Ontario Universities: An exploratory study. Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosovich, J. J., Hulleman, C. S., Barron, K. E., & Getty, S. (2015). A practical measure of student motivation: Establishing validity evidence for the expectancy-value-cost scale in middle school. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(5–6), 790–816. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431614556890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2020). Characteristics of Public School Teachers. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_clr.asp.

  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2019). Fast Facts: Back to School Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=372#College_enrollment.

  • Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osters, S. & Roberts, D. (2007). Academic success - How do students define it? Presentation at the Southern Association for College Student Affairs (SACSA)/ National Association of Student Personnel Administrators (NASPA) Region III/ Texas Association of College & University Student Personnel Association (TACUSPA) Joint Student Affairs Conference, Dallas, Texas.

  • Perez, T., Cromley, J. G., & Kaplan, A. (2014). The role of identity development, values, and costs in college STEM retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 315–329. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez, T., Wormington, S. V., Barger, M. M., Schartz-Bloom, R. D., Lee, Y., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2019). Science expectancy, value, and cost profiles and their proximal and distal relations to undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math persistence. Science Education, 103(2), 264–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radil, A. I. (2017). Teachers’ Perspectives on Motivational Practices in Classrooms: An exploratory sequential mixed methods design [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Alberta.

  • Rosenzweig, E. Q., Harackiewicz, J. M., Priniski, S. J., Hecht, C. A., Canning, E. A., Tibbetts, Y., & Hyde, J. S. (2019). Choose your own intervention: Using choice to enhance the effectiveness of a utility-value intervention. Motivation Science, 5(3), 269–276. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, E. Q., Wigfield, A., & Hulleman, C. S. (2020). More useful or not so bad? Examining the effects of utility value and cost reduction interventions in college physics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(1), 166–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010). Expectancy-value theory: Retrospective and prospective. In T. C. Urdan & S. A. Karabenick (Eds.), The decade ahead: theoretical perspectives on motivation and achievement advances in motivation and achievement. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willingham, W. W., Pollack, J. M., & Lewis, C. (2002). Grades and test scores: Accounting for observed differences. Journal of Educational Measurement, 39(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2002.tb01133.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yazedjian, A., Toews, M. L., Sevin, T., & Purswell, K. E. (2008). “ It’s a Whole New World”: A qualitative exploration of college students’ definitions of and strategies for college success. Journal of College Student Development, 49(2), 141–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • York, T. T., Gibson, C., & Rankin, S. (2015). Defining and measuring academic success. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 20(5), 1–20. http://www.pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=20&n=5.

  • Zimmerman, M., Ruggero, C. J., Chelminski, I., Young, D., Posternak, M. A., Friedman, M., et al. (2006). Developing brief scales for use in clinical practice: The reliability and validity of single-item self-report measures of depression symptom severity, psychosocial impairment due to depression, and quality of life. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 67, 1536–1541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lauren D. Goegan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goegan, L.D., Dueck, B.S. & Daniels, L.M. Are you feeling successful?: Examining postsecondary student perceptions of success with an expectancy value theory lens. Soc Psychol Educ 24, 985–1001 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-021-09641-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-021-09641-y

Keywords

Navigation