Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Relational Recognition, Educational Liminality, and Teacher–Student Relationships

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Theories about relationships impact the ways in which we imagine that teachers and students can or should interact. These theories often involve either individualistic or relational assumptions. A contrast has been made between theories that assume that the individual is primary, and the relationship secondary, and those that assume that the relationship is primary and the individual secondary. Roughly mapping on to these assumptions are the implications that educational relationships either ought to facilitate autonomy or community, emancipation or socialization. I argue that educational contexts occupy a liminal space at the boundaries of multiple contexts, and so have limited ability to either emancipate or socialize students relative to these contexts. However, the very liminality of the educational space allows for a unique view and exploration of these contexts using autonomy and community as means rather than ends of education. Learning, described here as re-co-gnition, is facilitated as students move away from and then return to the liminal (relational), and teachers and students view again together (recognize) the boundaries of these various contexts as they intersect at the school. Implications for teaching in this liminal space are explored for recognizing relationships between student and teacher, childhood and adulthood, home and the “outside world,” and boundaries within and between disciplines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Biesta, G.J.J. 2014. The beautiful risk of education. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. 1949. The hero with a thousand faces. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius-White, J. 2007. Learner-centered teacher–student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 77(1): 113–143. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, H. 2003. Conceptualizing the role and influence of student-teacher relationships on children’s social and cognitive development. Educational Psychologist 38: 207–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egan, K. 2001. Why education is so difficult and contentious. Teachers College Record 103(6): 923–941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. 2015. Educational relationships: Rousseau, Wollstonecraft and social justice. In Re-imagining relationships in education: Ethics, politics and practices, ed. M. Griffiths, M.H. Hoveid, S. Todd, and C. Winter, 1–22. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M., M.H. Hoveid, S. Todd, and C. Winter. 2015. Re-imagining relationships in education: Ethics, politics and practices. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoveid, M.H., and A. Finne. 2015. ‘You have to give of yourself’: Care and love in pedagogical relations. In Re-imagining relationships in education: Ethics, politics and practices, ed. M. Griffiths, M.H. Hoveid, S. Todd, and C. Winter, 73–88. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. 2015. Re-reading Diotima: Resources for a relational pedagogy. In Re-imagining relationships in education: Ethics, politics and practices, ed. M. Griffiths, M.H. Hoveid, S. Todd, and C. Winter, 1–22. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcia, J.E. 2002. Adolescence, identity, and the Bernardone family. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research 2(3): 199–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. 1984. Caring, a feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. 1993. Educating for intelligent belief or unbelief. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. 2010. The maternal factor: Two paths to morality. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, M.J. 2017. Religious liberty, moral recognition, and strong relationality. Journal of Moral Education 46(4): 363–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roorda, D.L., S. Jak, M. Zee, F.J. Oort, and H.M.Y. Koomen. 2017. Affective teacher–student relationships and students’ engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic update and test of the mediating role of engagement. School Psychology Review 46(3): 239–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roorda, D.L., H.M.Y. Koomen, J.L. Spilt, and F.J. Oort. 2011. The influence of affective teacher–student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research 81(4): 493–529. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311421793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thayer-Bacon, B. 2003. Relational “(e)pistemologies”. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thayer-Bacon, B. 2017. Relational ontologies. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, S. 2015. Between body and spirit: The liminality of pedagogical relationships. In Re-imagining relationships in education: Ethics, politics and practices, ed. M. Griffiths, M.H. Hoveid, S. Todd, and C. Winter, 1–22. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C. 2015. Towards a thinking and practice of sexual difference: Putting the practice of relationship at the centre. In Re-imagining relationships in education: Ethics, politics and practices, ed. M. Griffiths, M.H. Hoveid, S. Todd, and C. Winter, 23–37. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Richardson.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Richardson, M.J. Relational Recognition, Educational Liminality, and Teacher–Student Relationships. Stud Philos Educ 38, 453–466 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-019-09672-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-019-09672-1

Keywords

Navigation