Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Emotion Education without Ontological Commitment?

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Emotion education is enjoying new-found popularity. This paper explores the ‘cosy consensus’ that seems to have developed in education circles, according to which approaches to emotion education are immune from metaethical considerations such as contrasting rationalist and sentimentalist views about the moral ontology of emotions. I spell out five common assumptions of recent approaches to emotion education and explore their potential compatibility with four paradigmatic moral ontologies. I argue that three of these ontologies fail to harmonise with the common assumptions. Either those three must therefore be rejected or, if we want to retain one or more of them (for instance, Jesse Prinz’s recent rebranding of hard sentimentalism that I explore in detail), we need to revise our assumptions about the practice of emotion education in ways that are both radical and, I argue, ultimately unacceptable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aristotle. (1985). Nicomachean ethics, trans. T. Irwin. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

  • Blasi, A. (1999). Emotions and moral motivation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 29(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, M. S. (2008). Value and fitting emotions. Journal of Value Inquiry, 42(4), 465–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cigman, R. (2008). Enhancing children. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 42(3–4), 539–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curzer, H. J. (2007). Aristotle, founder of the ethics of care. Journal of Value Inquiry, 41(2–4), 221–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Arms, J., & Jacobson, D. (2000a). Sentiment and value. Ethics, 110(4), 722–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Arms, J., & Jacobson, D. (2000b). The moralistic fallacy: On the ‘appropriateness’ of emotions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 61(1), 65–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Arms, J., & Jacobson, D. (2006). Sensibility theory and projectivism. In D. Copp (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of ethical theory (pp. 186–218). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Sousa, R. (2001). Moral emotions. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 4(2), 109–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldie, P. (2008). Misleading emotions. In D. Künzle, G. Brun, & U. Doğuoğlu (Eds.), Epistemology and emotions (pp. 149–165). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1978). A treatise of human nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K. (2006). Metaethics and emotions research: A response to Prinz. Philosophical Explorations, 9(1), 45–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristjánsson, K. (2002). Justifying emotions: Pride and jealousy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristjánsson, K. (2007). Aristotle, emotions, and education. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristjánsson, K. (2009a). Recent social-scientific work on interdependent, independent, and bicultural selves: The moral implications. American Philosophical Quarterly, 46(1), 73–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristjánsson, K. (2009b). Realist versus anti-realist moral selves—and the irrelevance of narrativism. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 39(2), 167–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, B., & Reichenbach, R. (2007). Educating moral emotions: A praxiological analysis. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 26(2), 147–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J. (1996). Deliberation and moral development in Aristotle’s ethics. In S. Engstrom & J. Whiting (Eds.), Aristotle, Kant, and the Stoics: Rethinking happiness and duty (pp. 19–35). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, S. (2004). Sentimental rules: On the natural foundations of moral judgment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, J. J. (2007). The emotional construction of morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugmire, D. (2005). Sound sentiments: Integrity in the emotions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Railton, P. (2003). Facts, values, and norms: Essays toward a morality of consequences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosati, C. S. (2006). Moral motivation. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved June 10, 2009, from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-motivation/.

  • Suissa, J. (2008). Lessons from a new science? On teaching happiness in schools. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 42(3–4), 575–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svavarsdóttir, S. (1999). Moral cognitivism and motivation. Philosophical Review, 108(2), 161–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Wright, G. H. (1963). Varieties of goodness. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristján Kristjánsson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kristjánsson, K. Emotion Education without Ontological Commitment?. Stud Philos Educ 29, 259–274 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-009-9165-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-009-9165-z

Keywords

Navigation