Skip to main content
Log in

Designs of Learning and the Formation and Transformation of Knowledge in an Era of Globalization

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, the formation and transformation of knowledge and the role of designs for learning will be elaborated and discussed in relation to the introduction of national curricula and school textbooks during the beginning of the industrialized era vs. the introduction of individual curricula and new digital learning resources in the post-industrialized era of globalization and multiculturalism. Quite different teaching and learning strategies have been emphasized, which I will call here “designed information and teaching” vs. “designs for learning”. It seems obvious that our current society is in a stage of change that requires a new understanding of knowledge, learning and identity formation. The new position and role of the learner underlines the productive and constructive aspect of learning. Pupils not only read texts, they also produce texts, pictures, film and music and they compile and edit virtual texts. Multimodal texts, as well as the information flow of the Internet, are the consequences of, and at the same time a vehicle for, new social patterns. “Learning Design Sequences” (LDS) is introduced as a theoretical map for the purpose of analyzing critical incidents in (a creative) learning process, using different genres, modes and media in a process of meaning-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Also see Bowker and Star 2000, and Mäkitalo 2002, concerning the classification of diseases and persons outside the labour market respectively.

  2. Knorr Cetina (1994) and Gadamer (1988) claims that tradition is always recreated through practices. At the same time he sees tradition as ‘given’. Vattimo (1997) discusses tradition as not given but as something ‘handed over’ (über-lieferung), and thus as something open for negotiation and conceptual re-creation.

  3. To this model is also added more general Learning Design Sequences and Semi-formal Learning Design Sequences (Selander 2008).

References

  • Aarseth, E. (1997). Cybertext. Perspectives on ergodic literature. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alant, L., Engan, B., Otnes, H., Sandvik, M., & Schwebs, T. (2003). Samhandling med, foran og via skjermen. Småskoleeleven på vei mot digital kompetanse. Oslo: Forsknings-og kompetansenettverk for it i utdanning Universitet i Oslo.

  • Bäckström, Å. (2005). Spår––om brädsportskultur, informella lärprocesser och identitet. Stockholm: HLS Förlag.

  • Berlin, I. (2000). The roots of romanticism. London: Pimlico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandão, H., & Micheletti, G. (Eds.) (1997). Aprender e ensinar com textos didáticos e paradidáticos. São Paulo: Cortez Editora.

  • Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting things out. Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleverlearning’s press release 2006-09-19. http://www.cleverlearning.se/Pressrelease_e-learning_i_skolan.pdf

  • Douglas, M. (1986). How institutions think. New York: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1996). Thought styles. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drenoyianni, H. (2006). Reconsidering change and ICT: Perspectives of a human and democratic education. Springer Science + Business Media, LLC.

  • Fischer-Lichte, E., & Wulf, C. (Eds.) (2001). Theorien des Performativen. Paragrana. Internationale Zeitschrift für Historische Anthropologie. Band 10; Heft 1. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

  • Fiske, J. (1990). Kommunikationsteorier. En introduktion. Uppsala: Wahlsröm&Widstrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H-G. (1988). Truth and method. (Wahrheit und Methode 1960). London, Sheed and Wards.

  • Gee, J. P. (2004). What videogames have to teach us about learning and literacy. Palgrave MacMillan.

  • Holm Sörensen, B., Danielsen, O., Nielsen, J. (2006). Children’s informal learning in the context of schools of the knowledge society. Springer Science + Business Media, LLC.

  • Kahr-Höjland, A. (2006). The personal exhibition as an educational tool in a semi-formal learning setting. In E. Bruillard et al. (Ed.), Caught in the web or lost in the textbook? (pp. 87–97). Basse-Normandie, Paris: IARTEM, IUFM.

  • Knorr Cetina, K. D. (1994). Primitive classification and postmodernity: Towards a sociological notion of fiction. Theory, Culture & Society, 11(3), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. R. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. R., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J., & Tsatsarelis, C. (2001). Multimodal teaching and learning. The rhetorics of the science classroom. London, New York: Continuum.

  • Kress, G. R., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse. The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linderoth, J. (2004). Datorspelandets mening. Bortom idén om den interaktiva illusionen. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindstrand, F. (2006). Att göra skillnad. Representation, identitet och lärande i ungdomars arbete och berättande med film. Stockholm: HLS Förlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loveless, A. (2003). Creating spaces in the primary curriculum: ICT in creative subjects. The Curriculum Journal, 14(Spring), 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lövgren, J., & Stolterman, E. (2004). Thoughtful interaction design. A design perspective on information technology. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäkitalo, Å. (2002). Categorizing work: Knowing, arguing and social dilemmas in vocational guidance. Dissertation, Univ. of Gothenburg.

  • Masuda, Y. (1982). Information society as post-industrial society. Somerset, UK: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melucci, A. (1992). Nomader I nuet. Sociala rörelser och individuella behov I dagens samhälle. Göteborg: Daidalos. (Nomads of the present. Social movements and individual needs in contemporary society, 1989).

  • O’Reilly, T. (2005). What Is Web 2.0. Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html

  • Orwell, G. (2004/1945). Animal farm. London: Nick Hern Books.

  • Orwell, G. (2005/1949). 1984. UK: Ediciones Notes.

  • Otnes, H. (2001). Hvor interactive er de interactive tekstene? In S. Selander & D. Skjelbred (Eds.), Fokus på pedagogiske tekster. Artikler fra prosjektet Valg, vurdering og kvalitetsutvikling av lærebøker og andre læremidler. Notat No 5. Skrifter fra Høgskolen i Vestfold, Tønsberg.

  • Rosen, J. (2001). The talmud & the internet. London: Continuum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rostvall, A-L., & West, T. (2001). Interaktion och kunskapsutveckling. En studie av frivillig musikundervisning. Dissertation, LHS, HLS Förlag.

  • Säljö, R. (2005). Lärande och kulturella redskap: om lärprocesser och det kollektiva minnet. Stockholm: Norstedts akademiska förlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selander, S. (2008). Tecken för lärande – tecken på lärande. Ett designteoretiskt perspektiv. In A.-L. Rostvall & S. Selander (Eds.), Design för lärande. Stockholm: Norstedts Akademiska Förlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selander, S., Åkerfeldt, A., & Engström, S. (2007). Resurser för lärande i en digital miljö––om “Learning Design Sequences” I. In S. Knudsen, D. Skjelbred & B. Aamotsbakken (Eds.), Tekst i vekst. Oslo: Novus Forlag.

  • Selander, S. & van Leeuwen, T. (1999). Vad gör en text? I. In C.-A. Säfström & L. Östman (Eds.), Textanalys. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

  • Selander, S., & Skjelbred, D. (2003). Pedagogiske tekster for kommunikasjon og læring. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, S. (2001) On longing. Narratives of the miniature, the gigantic, the souvenir, the collection. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valverde, G. A. et al. (2002). According to the book. Using TIMMS to investigate the translation of policy into practice through the world of textbooks. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Leeuwen, T., & Selander, S. (1995). Picturing ‘our’ heritage in the pedagogic text: layout, and illustrations in am Australian and a Swedish history textbook. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(5), 501–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vattimo, G. (1997). Utöver tolkningen. Hermeneutikens betydelse. Göteborg: Daidalos. (These texts are translated from various sources like Oltre l’interpretazione och Etica dell’interpretazione; 1988–1994).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Staffan Selander.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Selander, S. Designs of Learning and the Formation and Transformation of Knowledge in an Era of Globalization. Stud Philos Educ 27, 267–281 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-007-9068-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-007-9068-9

Keywords

Navigation