Abstract
In this article, the formation and transformation of knowledge and the role of designs for learning will be elaborated and discussed in relation to the introduction of national curricula and school textbooks during the beginning of the industrialized era vs. the introduction of individual curricula and new digital learning resources in the post-industrialized era of globalization and multiculturalism. Quite different teaching and learning strategies have been emphasized, which I will call here “designed information and teaching” vs. “designs for learning”. It seems obvious that our current society is in a stage of change that requires a new understanding of knowledge, learning and identity formation. The new position and role of the learner underlines the productive and constructive aspect of learning. Pupils not only read texts, they also produce texts, pictures, film and music and they compile and edit virtual texts. Multimodal texts, as well as the information flow of the Internet, are the consequences of, and at the same time a vehicle for, new social patterns. “Learning Design Sequences” (LDS) is introduced as a theoretical map for the purpose of analyzing critical incidents in (a creative) learning process, using different genres, modes and media in a process of meaning-making.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Knorr Cetina (1994) and Gadamer (1988) claims that tradition is always recreated through practices. At the same time he sees tradition as ‘given’. Vattimo (1997) discusses tradition as not given but as something ‘handed over’ (über-lieferung), and thus as something open for negotiation and conceptual re-creation.
To this model is also added more general Learning Design Sequences and Semi-formal Learning Design Sequences (Selander 2008).
References
Aarseth, E. (1997). Cybertext. Perspectives on ergodic literature. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University press.
Alant, L., Engan, B., Otnes, H., Sandvik, M., & Schwebs, T. (2003). Samhandling med, foran og via skjermen. Småskoleeleven på vei mot digital kompetanse. Oslo: Forsknings-og kompetansenettverk for it i utdanning Universitet i Oslo.
Bäckström, Å. (2005). Spår––om brädsportskultur, informella lärprocesser och identitet. Stockholm: HLS Förlag.
Berlin, I. (2000). The roots of romanticism. London: Pimlico.
Brandão, H., & Micheletti, G. (Eds.) (1997). Aprender e ensinar com textos didáticos e paradidáticos. São Paulo: Cortez Editora.
Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting things out. Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press Ltd.
Cleverlearning’s press release 2006-09-19. http://www.cleverlearning.se/Pressrelease_e-learning_i_skolan.pdf
Douglas, M. (1986). How institutions think. New York: Syracuse University Press.
Douglas, M. (1996). Thought styles. London: SAGE Publications.
Drenoyianni, H. (2006). Reconsidering change and ICT: Perspectives of a human and democratic education. Springer Science + Business Media, LLC.
Fischer-Lichte, E., & Wulf, C. (Eds.) (2001). Theorien des Performativen. Paragrana. Internationale Zeitschrift für Historische Anthropologie. Band 10; Heft 1. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Fiske, J. (1990). Kommunikationsteorier. En introduktion. Uppsala: Wahlsröm&Widstrand.
Gadamer, H-G. (1988). Truth and method. (Wahrheit und Methode 1960). London, Sheed and Wards.
Gee, J. P. (2004). What videogames have to teach us about learning and literacy. Palgrave MacMillan.
Holm Sörensen, B., Danielsen, O., Nielsen, J. (2006). Children’s informal learning in the context of schools of the knowledge society. Springer Science + Business Media, LLC.
Kahr-Höjland, A. (2006). The personal exhibition as an educational tool in a semi-formal learning setting. In E. Bruillard et al. (Ed.), Caught in the web or lost in the textbook? (pp. 87–97). Basse-Normandie, Paris: IARTEM, IUFM.
Knorr Cetina, K. D. (1994). Primitive classification and postmodernity: Towards a sociological notion of fiction. Theory, Culture & Society, 11(3), 1–23.
Kress, G. R. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.
Kress, G. R., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J., & Tsatsarelis, C. (2001). Multimodal teaching and learning. The rhetorics of the science classroom. London, New York: Continuum.
Kress, G. R., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse. The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.
Linderoth, J. (2004). Datorspelandets mening. Bortom idén om den interaktiva illusionen. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
Lindstrand, F. (2006). Att göra skillnad. Representation, identitet och lärande i ungdomars arbete och berättande med film. Stockholm: HLS Förlag.
Loveless, A. (2003). Creating spaces in the primary curriculum: ICT in creative subjects. The Curriculum Journal, 14(Spring), 5–21.
Lövgren, J., & Stolterman, E. (2004). Thoughtful interaction design. A design perspective on information technology. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
Mäkitalo, Å. (2002). Categorizing work: Knowing, arguing and social dilemmas in vocational guidance. Dissertation, Univ. of Gothenburg.
Masuda, Y. (1982). Information society as post-industrial society. Somerset, UK: Transaction Publishers.
Melucci, A. (1992). Nomader I nuet. Sociala rörelser och individuella behov I dagens samhälle. Göteborg: Daidalos. (Nomads of the present. Social movements and individual needs in contemporary society, 1989).
O’Reilly, T. (2005). What Is Web 2.0. Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html
Orwell, G. (2004/1945). Animal farm. London: Nick Hern Books.
Orwell, G. (2005/1949). 1984. UK: Ediciones Notes.
Otnes, H. (2001). Hvor interactive er de interactive tekstene? In S. Selander & D. Skjelbred (Eds.), Fokus på pedagogiske tekster. Artikler fra prosjektet Valg, vurdering og kvalitetsutvikling av lærebøker og andre læremidler. Notat No 5. Skrifter fra Høgskolen i Vestfold, Tønsberg.
Rosen, J. (2001). The talmud & the internet. London: Continuum Books.
Rostvall, A-L., & West, T. (2001). Interaktion och kunskapsutveckling. En studie av frivillig musikundervisning. Dissertation, LHS, HLS Förlag.
Säljö, R. (2005). Lärande och kulturella redskap: om lärprocesser och det kollektiva minnet. Stockholm: Norstedts akademiska förlag.
Selander, S. (2008). Tecken för lärande – tecken på lärande. Ett designteoretiskt perspektiv. In A.-L. Rostvall & S. Selander (Eds.), Design för lärande. Stockholm: Norstedts Akademiska Förlag.
Selander, S., Åkerfeldt, A., & Engström, S. (2007). Resurser för lärande i en digital miljö––om “Learning Design Sequences” I. In S. Knudsen, D. Skjelbred & B. Aamotsbakken (Eds.), Tekst i vekst. Oslo: Novus Forlag.
Selander, S. & van Leeuwen, T. (1999). Vad gör en text? I. In C.-A. Säfström & L. Östman (Eds.), Textanalys. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Selander, S., & Skjelbred, D. (2003). Pedagogiske tekster for kommunikasjon og læring. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Stewart, S. (2001) On longing. Narratives of the miniature, the gigantic, the souvenir, the collection. Durham: Duke University Press.
Valverde, G. A. et al. (2002). According to the book. Using TIMMS to investigate the translation of policy into practice through the world of textbooks. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
van Leeuwen, T., & Selander, S. (1995). Picturing ‘our’ heritage in the pedagogic text: layout, and illustrations in am Australian and a Swedish history textbook. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(5), 501–522.
Vattimo, G. (1997). Utöver tolkningen. Hermeneutikens betydelse. Göteborg: Daidalos. (These texts are translated from various sources like Oltre l’interpretazione och Etica dell’interpretazione; 1988–1994).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Selander, S. Designs of Learning and the Formation and Transformation of Knowledge in an Era of Globalization. Stud Philos Educ 27, 267–281 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-007-9068-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-007-9068-9