Skip to main content
Log in

Project Management Supports (Requisitely) Holistic: Socially Responsible Action in Business Systems

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Systemic Practice and Action Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article emphasizes the role of projects and project management in assuring socially responsible acting of contemporary business systems, presenting some practical applications in the field of tourism. With arising number of projects in business systems and their growing strategic importance, the role of project management has radically been changing for the last two decades. Managing organizations, as a central topic among seven crucial topics in ISO 26000 on social responsibility, is strongly associated with managing projects. Projects have important influence on the established as well as on establishing ongoing operations and are important tools in assuring business systems’ strategic development, by exposing interdependences and supporting the requisitely holistic approach. This article tries to fill the gap we detected in literature on social responsibility where projects and project management seem not to have a proper role. Four different links and interdependencies between project management and systems theory (which ISO 26000 reinforces) are exposed: (1) systemic treatment of project management, (2) systematical treatment of projects as holistic works, (3) systemic treatment of projects as parts of BSs’ strategies, (4) systemic treatment of projects throughout their entire life cycle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. They are formally or legally independent, but naturally and economically needing each other, hence interdependent because they complete each other by differences, such as mutually different specialists at work.

References

  • Anbar FT (1985) A systems approach to project evaluation. Proj Manag J 16(3):21–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson R (1999) Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria. Int J Proj Manag 17(6):337–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson R, Crawford L, Ward S (2006) Fundamental uncertainties in projects and the scope of project management. Int J Proj Manag 24(8):687–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertalanffy vL (1979) General system theory: foundations, developments, applications, Revised edition. Sixth Printing George Braziller, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Botkin DB, Keller EA (1995) Environment science: earth as a living planet. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bredillet CN (2009) Mapping the dynamics of the project management field: project management in action—Part 2. Proj Manag J 40(2):2–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duh M, Belak J, Milfelner B (2010) Core values, culture and ethical climate as constitutional elements of ethical behaviour: exploring differences between family and non-family enterprises. J Bus Ethics 97(3):473–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming QW, Koppelman JM (1998) Earned value project management: a powerful tool for software projects. J Def Softw Eng 6:19–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Hameri AP, Heikkilä J (2002) Improving efficiency: time-critical interfacing of project tasks. Int J Proj Manag 20(2):143–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauc A (2007) Projektni management. GV Založba, Ljubljana

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauc A, Vrečko I, Barilović Z (2011) A holistic project-knowledge society as a condition for solving global strategic crises. Društvena istraživanja 20(4-114):1039–1060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson D (2002) Disciplining the professional: the case of Project Management. J Manag Stud 39(6):803–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2010): ISO 26000. See: http://www.iso.org/iso/discovering_iso_26000.pdf

  • Kerzner H (1979) Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling and controlling. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lock D (2007) Project management, 9th edn. Gower, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Močnik D, Širec K (2010) The determinants of internet use controlling for income level: cross-country empirical evidence. Inf Econ Policy 22(3):243–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulej M (1974) Dialektična teorija sistemov in ljudski reki. Naše gospodarstvo 21(3–4):207–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulej M (1979) Ustvarjalno delo in dialektična teorija sistemov (Creative Work and the Dialectical Systems Theory). Razvojni Center, Celje

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulej M, Espejo R, Jackson M et al (2000) Dialektična in druge mehkosistemske teorije (podlaga za uspešen management). Univerza v Mariboru, Ekonomsko-poslovna fakulteta, Maribor

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulej M (2007) Systems theory—a worldview and/or a methodology aimed at requisite holism/realism of humans’ thinking, decisions and action. Syst Res Behav Sci 24(3):347–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulej M, Kajzer Š (1998) Ethics of interdependence and the law of requisite holism. In: Rebernik M, Mulej M (eds) STIQE ‘98. Institute for Entrepreneurship at Faculty of Business Economics, Maribor, pp 129–140

    Google Scholar 

  • PMI (2008) A guide to the project management body of knowledge, 4th edn. Project Management Institute, Newton Square

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack J (2007) The changing paradigm of project management. Int J Proj Manag 25:266–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roman DD (1986) Managing projects: a systems approach. Elsevier Science, New York

  • Shenhar AJ (1998) From theory to practice: toward a typology of project-management styles. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 45(1):33–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh H, Singh A (2002) Principles of complexity and chaos theory in project execution: a new approach to management. Cost Eng 44(12):23–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Slevin DP, Cleland DI, Pinto JK (2002) The frontiers of project management research. Project Management Institute, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka H. (2004): The changing landscape of project management. 4th International project management workshop, ESC Lille

  • Vrečko I (2011) Obvladovanje strateških kriz z uporabo projektnega menedžmenta kot celovit invencijsko-inovacijski proces: doktorska disertacija. Univerza v Mariboru, Ekonomsko-poslovna fakulteta, Maribor

    Google Scholar 

  • Wysocki RK (2011) Effective project management: traditional, agile, extreme. Wiley, Indianapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeo KT (1993) Systems thinking and project management—time to reunite. Int J Proj Manag 11(2):111–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Igor Vrečko.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vrečko, I., Lebe, S.S. Project Management Supports (Requisitely) Holistic: Socially Responsible Action in Business Systems. Syst Pract Action Res 26, 561–569 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-013-9304-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-013-9304-x

Keywords

Navigation