Abstract
Stereotype threat effects occur when members of a stigmatized group perform poorly on a task because they fear confirming a negative stereotype that is associated with their ingroup. The present study investigates whether the observed achievement gap in standardized testing between high- and low-socioeconomic status (SES) American students can be due, in part, to this phenomenon. Participants were placed in one of four conditions that varied in level of “threat” related to socioeconomic status. Results show that when socioeconomic identity is made salient before taking a test, or when the test is presented as diagnostic of intelligence, low-SES students perform significantly worse, and report much lower self-confidence, than low-SES participants in the non-threatening conditions. When threatening conditions converge, performance of low-SES students is at its worst level. These results help us better understand the role stereotyping plays in the academic performance of low-SES students, and may partly explain the disparity on standardized test scores between low- and high-SES students.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
“The Simpsons” is a popular American animated television show.
This study is based on a survey of 5,001 American adults, conducted between April 23 and May 31, 1998.
Following Tabachnick and Fidell (2001) a log transformation was used, which resulted in a significant reduction in skewness and kurtosis and eliminated the deviation from normality (Shapiro-Wilk W = .96, p < .20).
We are grateful to Vincent Yzerbyt for his suggestions regarding these analyses.
This variable did not show significant skewness, so it was not transformed. Due to one missing value on this variable, the sample size for these analyses is 45.
References
Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Banks, M. E., & Marshall, C. A. (2005). Beyond the “triple whammy”: Considering social class as one factor in discrimination against persons with disabilities. In J. L. Chin (Ed.), The psychology of prejudice and discrimination: Disability, religion, physique, and other traits (Vol. 4, Race and ethnicity in psychology, pp. 95–110). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc.
Beck, E. L., Whitley, D. M., & Wolk, J. L. (1999). Legislators’ perceptions about poverty: Views from the Georgia general assembly. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 26, 87–104.
Bosson, J. K., Haymovitz, E. L., & Pinel, E. C. (2004). When saying and doing diverge: The effects of stereotype threat on self-reported versus non-verbal anxiety. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 247–255.
Bourdieu, P. (2002). Distinction; A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brantlinger, E. A. (2003). Dividing classes: How the middle class negotiates and rationalizes school advantage. New York: Routledge Falmer.
Brezina, T., & Winder, K. (2003). Economic disadvantage, status generalization, and negative racial stereotyping by white Americans. Social Psychology Quarterly. Special Issue: Race, Racism, and Discrimination, 66, 402–418.
Cadinu, M., Maass, A., Rosabianca, A., & Kiesner, J. (2005). Why do women underperform under stereotype threat? Evidence for the role of negative thinking. Psychological Science, 16, 572–578.
College Board (2005). 2005 College-bound seniors: Total group profile report. Retrieved September 25, 2005 from http://www.collegeboard.com/prod_downloads/about/news_info/cbsenior/yr2005/2005-college-bound-seniors.pdf.
Cortese, A. J. (1989). Subcultural differences in human sexuality: Race, ethnicity, and social class. In K. McKinney & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Human sexuality: The societal and interpersonal context (pp. 63–90). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
Cozzarelli, C., Wilkinson, A. V., & Tagler, M. J. (2001). Attitudes toward the poor and attributions for poverty. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 207–227.
Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608–630.
Crocker, J., Voelkl, K., Testa, M., & Major, B. (1991). Social stigma: The affective consequences of attributional ambiguity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 218–228.
Croizet, J. C., & Claire, T. (1998). Extending the concept of stereotype threat to social class: The intellectual underperformance of students from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 588–594.
Croizet, J. C., Despres, G., Gauzines, M. E., Huguet, P., Letens, J. P., & Meot, A. (2004). Stereotype threat undermines intellectual performance by triggering a disruptive mental load. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 721–731.
Darley, J. M., & Gross, P. H. (1983). A hypothesis-confirming bias in labeling effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 20–33.
Dasgupta, S. D. (2005). Women’s realities: Defining violence against women by immigration, race, and class. In N. J. Sokoloff & C. Pratt (Eds.), Domestic violence at the margins: Readings on race, class, gender, and culture (pp. 56–70). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., & Steele, C. M. (2005). Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women’s leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 276–287.
Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (1981). The effects of race, status, and ability on helping behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 192–204.
Dyson, M. E. (2005). Is Bill Cosby right? Or has the Black middle class lost its mind? New York: Basic Civitas Books.
Educational Testing Service (2002). GRE: Practicing to take the general test (10th ed.). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Educational Testing Service (2003). Factors that can influence performance on the GRE general test, 2002–2003. Retrieved May 24, 2006 from http://www.ets.org/Media/Tests/GRE/pdf/gre_factors_02–03.pdf
Fiske, S. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 357–411). New York: McGraw Hill.
Fiske, S. T., Xu, J., Cuddy, A. C., & Glick, P. (1999). (Dis)respecting versus (dis)liking: Status and interdependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of competence and warmth. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 473–490.
Ford, T. E., Ferguson, M. A., Brooks, J. L., & Hagadone, K. M. (2004). Coping sense of humor reduces effects of stereotype threat on women’s math performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 643–653.
Frable, D. E. S., Platt, L., & Hoey, S. (1998). Concealable stigmas and positive self-perceptions: Feeling better around similar others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 909–922.
Fredrickson, B. L, Roberts, T., Noll, S. M., Quinn, D. M., & Twenge, J. M. (1998). That swimsuit becomes you: Sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, and math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 269–284.
Gallup Poll Social Audit. (1998). Haves and have-nots: Perceptions of fairness and opportunity. Retrieved April 30, 2005 from http://www.gallup.com/poll/content/login.aspx?ci=9877
Gard, M. C. E., & Freeman, C. P. (1996). The dismantling of a myth: A review of eating disorders and socioeconomic status. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 20, 1–12.
Gonzales, P. M., Blanton, H., & Williams, K. J. (2002). The effects of stereotype threat and double-minority status on the test performance of Latino women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 659–670.
Good, C., Aronson, J., & Inzlicht, M. (2003). Improving adolescents’ standardized test performance: An intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 24, 645–662.
Greenwald, A., & Banaji, M. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–28.
Hartz, L. (1955). The liberal tradition in America. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Haycock, K. (2001). Closing the achievement gap. Educational Leadership, 58, 6–11.
Hess, T. M., Auman, C., Colcombe, S. J., & Rahhal, T. A. (2003). The impact of stereotype threat on age differences in memory performance. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58B, 3–12.
Hutchings, V. L., & Valentino, N. A. (2004). The centrality of race in American politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 383–408.
Jackman, M. R., & Muha, M. J. (1984). Education and intergroup attitudes: Moral enlightenment, superficial democratic commitment, or ideological refinement? American Sociological Review, 49, 751–770.
Johns, M., Schmader, T., & Martens, A. (2005). Knowing is half the battle: Teaching stereotype threat as a means of improving women’s math performance. Psychological Science, 16, 175–179.
Jost, J. T. (2001). Outgroup favoritism and the theory of system justification: A paradigm for investigating the effects of socioeconomic success on stereotype content. In G. B. Moskowitz (Ed.), Cognitive social psychology: The Princeton symposium on the legacy and future of social cognition (pp. 89–102). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27.
Jussim, L., & Eccles, J. (1995). Are teacher expectations biased by students’ gender, social class, or ethnicity? In Y. T. Lee, L. J. Jussim, & C. R. McCauley (Eds.), Stereotype accuracy: Toward appreciating group differences (pp. 245–271). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Jussim, L., Eccles, J., & Madon, S. (1996). Social perception, social stereotypes, and teacher expectations: Accuracy and the quest for the powerful self-fulfilling prophecy. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 28, pp. 281–388). San Diego, CA, US: Academic Press.
Kay, A. C., Jost, J. T., & Young, S. (2005). Victim derogation and victim enhancement as alternate routes to system justification. Psychological Science, 16, 240–246.
Landrine, H. (1999). Race x class stereotypes of women. In L. A. Peplau, S. C. DeBro, R. C. Veniegass, & P. L. Taylor (Eds.), Gender, culture, and ethnicity: Current research about women and men (pp. 38–61). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Co.
Leyens, J. P., Desert, M., Croizet, J. C., & Darcis, C. (2000). Stereotype threat: Are lower status and history of stigmatization preconditions of stereotype threat? Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1189–1199.
Lipset, S. M. (1996). American exceptionalism: A double-edged sword. New York: W.W. Norton.
Lott, B. (2002). Cognitive and behavioral distancing from the poor. American Psychologist, 57, 100–110.
Lott, B., & Saxon, S. (2002). The influence of ethnicity, social class and context on judgments about U.S. women. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 481–499.
Maass, A., & Cadinu, M. (2003). Stereotype threat: When minority members underperform. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 243–275.
Madon, S., Jussim, L., Keiper, S., Eccles, J., Smith, A., & Palumbo, P. (1998). The accuracy and power of sex, social class, and ethnic stereotypes: A naturalistic study in person perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1304–1318.
Major, B., & O’Brien, L. T. (2005). The social psychology of stigma. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 393–421.
McGee, G. W. (2004). Closing the achievement Gap: Lessons from Illinois’ golden spike high-poverty high-performing schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 9, 97–126.
Miller, C. M., McLaughlin, J. A., Haddon, J., & Chansky, N. M. (1968). Socioeconomic class and teacher bias. Psychological Reports, 23, 806.
Murray, C. B. (1996). Estimating achievement performance: A confirmation bias. Journal of Black Psychology, 22, 67–85.
Niemann, Y. F., O’Connor, E., & McClorie, R. (1998). Intergroup stereotypes of working class Blacks and Whites: Implications for stereotype threat. Western Journal of Black Studies, 22, 103–108.
Quinn, D. M., Kahng, S. K., & Crocker, J. (2004). Discreditable: Stigma effects of revealing a mental illness history on test performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 803–815.
Rothsten, R. (2004). Class and the classroom. American School Board Journal, 191, 16–22.
Sacks P. (2003). Class rules: The fiction of egalitarian higher education. Chronicle of Higher Education, 49, 7–11.
Sacks P. (2004). The geography of privilege. ENCOUNTER: Education for Meaning and Social Justice, 17, 5–9.
Schmader T., & Johns, M. (2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 440–452.
Shih M., Pittinsky T. L., & Ambady, N. (1999). Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 10, 80–83.
Simpson J. O., & Schnitzer, D. K. (2005). Accountability for all. American School Board Journal, 192, 17–21.
Spencer S. J., Steele C. M., & Quinn, D. (1999). Under suspicion of inability: Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4–28.
Steele C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.
Stone J., Lynch C. I., Sjomeling M., & Darley, J. M. (1999). Stereotype threat effects on Black and White athletic performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1213–1227.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Triandis, H. C., & Triandis, L. M. (1987). Race, social class, religion, and nationality as determinants of social distance. In W. Bergmann (Ed.), Error without trial: Psychological research on antisemitism. Current research on antisemitism (Vol. 2, pp. 501–516). Oxford, England: Walter De Gruyter.
Weeks, M., & Lupfer, M. B. (2004). Complicating race: The relationship between prejudice, race, and social class categorizations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 972–984.
Willis, F. N., & Carlson, R. A. (1993). Singles ads: Gender, social class, and time. Sex Roles, 29, 387–404.
Yzerbyt, V. Y., Muller, D., & Judd, C. M. (2004). Adjusting researchers’ approach to adjustment: On the use of covariates when testing interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 424–431.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Bill Hirst and Ernesto Verdeja for comments on earlier drafts of this article, as well as John Nikkah and Tava Auslan for help with data collection and coding. We are also grateful for a Clara Mayo Grant from the Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues, which funded portions of this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Spencer, B., Castano, E. Social Class is Dead. Long Live Social Class! Stereotype Threat among Low Socioeconomic Status Individuals. Soc Just Res 20, 418–432 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0047-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0047-7