Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Transportation Disadvantage and Neighborhood Sociodemographics: A Composite Indicator Approach to Examining Social Inequalities

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transportation disadvantage refers to the barriers to or limits on the participation in daily socioeconomic and political life due to the reduced physical accessibility to services and opportunities. The transportation disadvantaged groups not only face the problems of social exclusion in location, but also experience greater exposure to a diversity of social and environmental threat. Under this context, identifying the transportation disadvantaged neighborhoods is of great interest for urban planners. This paper examines the transportation disadvantage in association with neighborhood sociodemographics in Shenzhen, China. A set of multidimensional indicators are initially selected to measure the transportation disadvantage (physical conditions, public transport services, education opportunity, employment opportunity, medical care opportunity, food opportunity, and commercial opportunity). Based on these indicators, principal component analysis produces four composite indicators of different types of transportation disadvantage: transportation disadvantage in physical infrastructure and public services, transportation disadvantage in food and education accessibility, transportation disadvantage in medical care accessibility, and transportation disadvantage in commercial and employment accessibility. In space, the transportation disadvantaged neighborhoods are generally located in the outskirts. Transportation disadvantage is more likely to be observed in neighborhoods that are economically, educationally, residentially and occupationally disadvantaged. These findings reveal significant inequalities in transportation opportunity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abson, D. J., Dougill, A. J., & Stringer, L. C. (2012). Using principal component analysis for information-rich socio-ecological vulnerability mapping in southern Africa. Applied Geography, 35, 515–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, T. L., Colabianchi, N., Hibbert, J. D., Porter, D. E., Lawson, A. D., & Liese, A. D. (2016). Scale effects in food environment research: Implications from assessing socioeconomic dimensions of supermarket accessibility in an eight-county region of South Carolina. Applied Geography, 68, 20–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, N., Hine, J., & Bukhari, S. M. A. (2013). Analysing the impact of network change on transport disadvantage: A GIS-based case study of Belfast. Journal of Transport Geography, 31, 192–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera-Barona, P., Wei, C., & Hagenlocher, M. (2016). Multiscale evaluation of an urban deprivation index: Implications for quality of life and healthcare accessibility planning. Applied Geography, 70, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H., & Liao, C. (2011). Exploring an integrated method for measuring the relative spatial equity in public facilities in the context of urban parks. Cities, 28, 361–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, C., & Ngan, R. M. (2012). Filtered life satisfaction and its socioeconomic determinants in Hong Kong. Social Indicators Research, 109, 223–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church, A., Frost, M., & Sullivan, K. (2000). Transport and social exclusion in London. Transport Policy, 7, 195–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clifton, K. J., & Lucas, K. (2004). Examining the empirical evidence of transport inequality in the US and UK. In K. Lucas (Ed.), Running on empty: Transport, social exclusion and environmental justice. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, S., & Vernier, P. (2002). Statistical models of landscape pattern metrics, with applications to regional scale dynamic forest simulations. Landscape Ecology, 17, 433–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currie, G., & Delbosc, A. (2011). Transport disadvantage: A review. In G. Currie (Ed.), New perspectives and methods in transport and social exclusion research. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Currie, G., Richardson, T., Smyth, P., Vella-Brodrick, D., Hine, J., & Lucas, K. (2009). Investigating links between transport disadvantage, social exclusion and well-being in melbourne—Preliminary results. Transport Policy, 16, 97–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delbosc, A., & Currie, G. (2011a). The spatial context of transport disadvantage, social exclusion and well-being. Journal of Transport Geography, 19, 1130–1137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delbosc, A., & Currie, G. (2011b). Transport problems that matter—Social and psychological links to transport disadvantage. Journal of Transport Geography, 19, 170–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delmelle, E. C., & Casas, I. (2012). Evaluating the spatial equity of bus rapid transit based accessibility patterns in a developing country: The case of Cali, Colombia. Transport Policy, 20, 36–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duvarci, Y., Tan, Y., & Mizokami, S. (2015). Transportation disadvantage impedance indexing: A methodological approach to reduce policy shortcomings. Journal of Transport Geography, 48, 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duvarci, Y., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2007). Integrated modeling approach for the transportation disadvantaged. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 133, 188–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duvarci, Y., Yigitcanlar, T., Alver, Y., & Mizokami, S. (2011). The variant concept of transportation disadvantaged: Evidence from Aydin, Turkey and Yamaga, Japan. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 137, 82–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engels, B., & Liu, G. (2011). Social exclusion, location and transport disadvantage amongst non-driving seniors in a Melbourne municipality, Australia. Journal of Transport Geography, 19, 984–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, J., & Farrington, C. (2005). Rural accessibility, social inclusion and social justice: Towards conceptualization. Journal of Transport Geography, 13, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fransen, K., Neutens, T., Farber, S., De Maeyer, P., Deruyter, G., & Witlox, F. (2015). Identifying public transport gaps using time-dependent accessibility levels. Journal of Transport Geography, 48, 176–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golub, A., & Martens, K. (2014). Using principles of justice to assess the modal equity of regional transportation plans. Journal of Transport Geography, 41, 10–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulhan, G., Ceylan, H., Özuysal, M., & Ceylan, H. (2013). Impact of utility-based accessibility measures on urban public transportation planning: A case study of Denizli, Turkey. Cities, 32, 102–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hine, J., & Grieco, M. (2003). Scatters and clusters in time and space: Implications for delivering integrated and inclusive transport. Transportation Journal, 10, 299–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe, I. T. (2002). Principal component analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamruzzaman, M., & Hine, J. (2011). Participation index: A measure to identify rural transport disadvantage? Journal of Transport Geography, 19, 882–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamruzzaman, M., & Hine, J. (2012). Analysis of rural activity spaces and transport disadvantage using a multi-method approach. Transport Policy, 19, 105–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamruzzaman, M., Hine, J., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2015). Investigating the link between carbon dioxide emissions and transport related social exclusion in rural Northern Ireland. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. doi:10.1007/s13762-015-0771-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S., Popoks, D., Prato, C. G., & Ceder, A. A. (2014). Using connectivity for measuring equity in transit provision. Journal of Transport Geography, 37, 82–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenyon, S., Lyons, G., & Rafferty, J. (2002). Transport and social exclusion: Investigating the possibility of promoting inclusion through virtual mobility. Journal of Transport Geography, 10, 207–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, V. (2015). Development of a Multidimensional Living Conditions Index (LCI). Social Indicators Research, 120, 455–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeSage, J., & Pace, R. K. (2009). Introduction to spatial econometrics. London: Taylor & Fran-cis/CRC.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Li, T., Dodson, J., & Sipe, N. (2015). Differentiating metropolitan transport disadvantage by mode: Household expenditure on private vehicle fuel and public transport fares in Brisbane, Australia. Journal of Transport Geography, 49, 16–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., & Liu, Y. (2016). Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and urban public green spaces availability: A localized modeling approach to inform land use policy. Land Use Policy, 57, 470–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Licaj, I., Haddak, M., Pochet, P., & Chiron, M. (2012). Individual and contextual socioeconomic disadvantages and car driving between 16 and 24 years of age: A multilevel study in the Rhône Département (France). Journal of Transport Geography, 22, 19–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C., Lin, K., & Kuo, Y. (2003). Application of factor analysis in the assessment of groundwater quality in a blackfoot disease area in Taiwan. Science of Total Environment, 313, 77–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loader, C., & Stanley, J. (2009). Growing bus patronage and addressing transport disadvantage-The Melbourne experience. Transport Policy, 16, 106–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, K. (2011). Making the connections between transport disadvantage and the social exclusion of low income populations in the Tshwane Region of South Africa. Journal of Transport Geography, 19, 1320–1334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, K. (2012). Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now? Transport Policy, 20, 105–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maroto, A., & Zofío, J. L. (2016). Accessibility gains and road transport infrastructure in Spain: A productivity approach based on the Malmquist index. Journal of Transport Geography, 52, 143–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokhtarian, P. L., Salomon, I., & Handy, S. L. (2006). The Impacts of Ict on leisure Activities and Travel: A Conceptual Exploration. Transportation, 33, 263–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, K. A., Vandivere, S., & Redd, Z. (2006). A Sociodemographic Risk Index. Social Indicators Research, 75, 45–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muhajarine, N., Labonte, R., Williams, A., & Randall, J. (2008). Person, perception, and place: What matters to health and quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 85, 53–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahmias-Biran, B. H., Sharaby, N., & Shiftan, Y. (2014). Equity aspects in transportation projects: Case study of transit fare change in Haifa. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 8, 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nedjat, S., Majdzadeh, R., Kheiltash, A., Jamshidi, E., & Yazdani, S. (2013). Social capital in association with socioeconomic variables in Iran. Social Indicators Research, 113, 1153–1170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Páez, A., Mercado, R. G., Farber, S., Morency, C., & Roorda, M. (2010). Relative accessibility deprivation indicators for urban settings: Definitions and application to food deserts in Montreal. Urban Studies, 47, 1415–1438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Páez, A., Scott, D. M., & Morency, C. (2012). Measuring accessibility: Positive and normative implementations of various accessibility indicators. Journal of Transport Geography, 25, 141–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, I. K., & von Rabenau, B. (2011). Disentangling agglomeration economies: Agents, sources, and spatial dependence. Journal of Regional Science, 51, 897–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power, A. (2012). Social inequality, disadvantaged neighbourhoods and transport deprivation: An assessment of the historical influence of housing policies. Journal of Transport Geography, 21, 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyrialakou, V. D., Gkritza, K., & Fricker, J. D. (2016). Accessibility, mobility, and realized travel behavior: Assessing transport disadvantage from a policy perspective. Journal of Transport Geography, 51, 252–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajab, J. M., MatJafri, M. Z., & Lim, H. S. (2013). Combining multiple regression and principal component analysis for accurate predictions for column ozone in Peninsular Malaysia. Atmospheric Environment, 71, 36–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rashid, K., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2015). Amethodological exploration to determine transportation disadvantage variables: The partial least square approach. World Review of Intermodal Transport Research, 5, 221–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricciardi, A. M., Xia, J., & Currie, G. (2015). Exploring public transport equity between separate disadvantaged cohorts: A case study in Perth, Australia. Journal of Transport Geography, 43, 111–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salon, D., & Gulyani, S. (2010). Mobility, Poverty, and Gender: Travel ‘Choices’ of Slum Residents in Nairobi, Kenya. Transport Reviews, 30, 641–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, T. W. (2008). Poverty, policy, and public transportation. Transportation Research Part A, 42, 833–841.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, B., Antunes, A., & Miller, E. J. (2008). Integrating equity objectives in a road network design model. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2089, 35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwanen, T., Lucas, K., Akyelken, N., Solsona, D., Carrasco, J., & Neutens, T. (2015). Rethinking the links between social exclusion and transport disadvantage through the lens of social capital. Transportation Research Part A, 74, 123–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D., & Horner, M. (2008). Examining the role of urban form in shaping people’s accessibility to opportunities: An exploratory spatial data analysis. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 1, 89–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, S., Fang, Z., Lu, S., & Tao, R. (2014). Impacts of high speed rail on railroad network accessibility in China. Journal of Transport Geography, 40, 112–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shay, E., Combs, T. S., Findley, D., Kolosna, C., Madeley, M., & Salvesen, D. (2016). Identifying transportation disadvantage: Mixed-methods analysis combining GIS mapping with qualitative data. Transport Policy, 48, 129–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sietchiping, R., Permezel, M. J., & Ngomsi, C. (2012). Transport and mobility in sub-Saharan African cities: An overview of practices, lessons and options for improvements. Cities, 29, 183–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, S., Gong, Y., Tan, B., Pi, J., Weng, M., & Cai, Z. (2016a). Area social deprivation and public health: Analyzing the spatial non-stationary associations using geographically weighed regression. Social Indicators Research. doi:10.1007/s11205-016-1390-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, S., Jiang, Z., Zhang, Q., & Zhang, Y. (2011). Transformation of agricultural landscapes under rapid urbanization: A threat to sustainability in Hang-Jia-Hu region, China. Applied Geography, 31, 439–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, S., Wan, C., Hu, Y., & Cai, Z. (2016b). Characterizing geographical preferences of international tourists and the local influential factors in China using geo-tagged photos on social media. Applied Geography, 73, 26–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, S., Wang, Y., Luo, F., Mai, G., & Pu, J. (2014). Peri-urban vegetated landscape pattern changes in relation to socioeconomic development. Ecological Indicators, 46, 477–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, S., Zhang, Q., Pi, J., Wan, C., & Weng, M. (2016c). Public health in linkage to land use: Theoretical framework, empirical evidence, and critical implications for reconnecting health promotion to land use policy. Land Use Policy, 57, 605–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taleai, M., Sliuzas, R., & Flacke, J. (2014). An integrated framework to evaluate the equity of urban public facilities using spatial multi-criteria analysis. Cities, 40, 56–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen, T., Sarmiento, O., Zuidgeest, M., & Brussel, M. (2015). Mapping equality in access: The case of Bogotá’s sustainable transportation initiatives. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 9, 457–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tribby, C. P., & Zandbergen, P. A. (2012). High-resolution spatio-temporal modeling of public transit accessibility. Applied Geography, 34, 345–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan, C., & Su, S. (2016). Neighborhood housing deprivation and public health: Theoretical linkage, empirical evidence, and implications for urban planning. Habitat International, 2016(57), 11–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., & Chen, N. (2015). A GIS-based spatial statistical approach to modeling job accessibility by transportation mode: case study of Columbus, Ohio. Journal of Transport Geography, 45, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., Tao, L., Qiu, F., & Lu, W. (2016). The role of socio-economic status and spatial effects on fresh food access: Two case studies in Canada. Applied Geography, 67, 27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q., & Zhang, Z. (2016). Examining social inequalities in urban public leisure spaces provision using principal component analysis. Quality & Quantity. doi:10.1007/s11135-016-0396-0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weng, M., Pi, J., Tan, B., Su, S., & Cai, Z. (2016). Area deprivation and liver cancer prevalence in Shenzhen, China: A spatial approach based on social indicators. Social Indicators Research. doi:10.1007/s11205-016-1358-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • You, H. (2016). Characterizing the inequalities in urban public green space provision in Shenzhen, China. Habitat International, 56, 176–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank two reviewers for providing valuable comments. This paper is supported by Grand Special of High resolution On Earth Observation: Application demonstration system of high resolution remote sensing and transportation (Grant No: 07-Y30B10-9001-14/16).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China

    Rui Xiao

  2. China Highway Engineering Consulting Corporation, Beijing, China

    Guofeng Wang

  3. Wuhan Planning and Design Institute, Wuhan, China

    Meng Wang

Authors
  1. Rui Xiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guofeng Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Meng Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rui Xiao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiao, R., Wang, G. & Wang, M. Transportation Disadvantage and Neighborhood Sociodemographics: A Composite Indicator Approach to Examining Social Inequalities. Soc Indic Res 137, 29–43 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1616-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1616-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation