Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Effect of Income on General Life Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increasing evidence from the empirical economic and psychological literature suggests that positive and negative well-being are more than opposite ends of the same phenomenon. Two separate measures of the dependent variable may therefore be needed when analyzing the determinants of subjective well-being. We investigate asymmetries in the effect of income on subjective well-being with a single-item measure of general life satisfaction. Using data from the German Socio-Economic Panel 1984–2004, and a flexible multiple-index ordered probit panel data model with varying thresholds, we find that income has only a minor effect on high satisfaction but significantly reduces dissatisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The question we actually use is a response to “How satisfied are you with your life, all things considered?” on an 11-point numerical scale, where “0” is labeled “completely dissatisfied” and “10” is labeled “completely satisfied”.

  2. For the ease of exposition, we set up the model in terms of cumulative conditional probabilities. Like the standard ordered probit, the generalized model may also be motivated in terms of a latent variable and a threshold crossing mechanism generating the ordinal response variable. We refer to Winkelmann and Boes (2006, Chap. 6) for a detailed outline of the underlying assumptions and identification issues in this framework.

  3. A straightforward generalization of (3) would be to let γ vary by the satisfaction levels, i.e., replace γ by γ y . Computationally somewhat more involved would be to let α i vary by the satisfaction level. Note that only time-varying covariates are included in \(\bar{X}_i\) because otherwise θ y and γ would not be separately identified.

  4. Stata is a registered trademark of StataCorp, College Station TX, USA. Type net search regoprob or ssc install regoprob in the command line of Stata to find out more about regoprob . See also the documentation of regoprob for details on the command syntax and the output generated by Stata.

  5. The variables we include in the model generally have very high response rates with missing information for only a few respondents, in particular for the GLS variable, so that we do not expect significant bias in the results from dropping these observations.

References

  • Blanchflower, D., & Oswald, A. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1359–1386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boes, S., & Winkelmann, R. (2006). Ordered response models. Allgemeines Statistisches Archiv, 90, 165–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co.

  • Bruni, L., & Porta, P. L. (2006). Economics and happiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Burkhauser, R. V., Butrica, B. A., Daly, M. C., & Lillard, D. R. (2001). The cross-national equivalent file: A product of cross-national research. In I. Becker, N. Ott, & G. Rolf (Eds.), Soziale Sicherung in einer dynamischen Gesellschaft. Festschrift für Richard Hauser zum 65. Geburtstag (pp. 354–376). Frankfurt/New York: Campus.

  • Chamberlain, G. (1982). Multivariate regression models for panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 18, 5–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. E., Etilé, F., Postel-Vinay, F., Senik, C., & van der Straeten, K. (2005). Heterogeneity in reported well-being: Evidence from twelve European countries. The Economic Journal, 115, C118–C132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. E., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. A. (2006). Income and happiness: Evidence, explanations and economic implications. Working paper #5, NCER Working Paper Series.

  • Clark, A., & Oswald, A. (1996). Satisfaction and comparison income. Journal of Public Economics, 61, 359–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Biswas Diener R. (2002). Will money increase subjective well-being: A literature review and guide and needed research. Social Indicators Research, 57, 119–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. David & M. Reder (Eds.). Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of Moses Abramowitz (pp. 89–125). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 27, 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Frijters, P. (2004). How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness. The Economic Journal, 114, 641–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S., Luechinger, S., & Stutzer, A. (2004). Valuing public goods: The life satisfaction approach. CESifo Working Paper No. 1158.

  • Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). Happiness and economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Headey, B. W., & Wooden, M. (2004). The effects of wealth and income on subjective well-being and ill-being. The Economic Record, 80, S24–S33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huppert, F. A., & Whittington, J. E. (2003). Evidence for the independence of positive and negative well-being: Implications for quality of life assessment. British Journal of Health Psychology, 8, 107–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lalive, R., & Stutzer, A. (2004). Approval of equal rights and gender differences in well-being. IZA Discussion Paper No. 1202.

  • Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a new science, New York: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luttmer, E. F. P. (2005). Neighbors as negatives: Relative earnings and well-being, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 20, 963–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. (1983). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mentzakis, E., & Moro (2009). The poor, the rich and the happy: Exploring the link between income and subjective well-being. Journal of Socio-Economics, 38, 147–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mundlak, Y. (1978). On the pooling of time series and cross section data. Econometrica, 46, 69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarze, J. (2003). Using panel data on income satisfaction to estimate the equivalence scale elasticity. Review of Income and Wealth, 49, 359–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terza, J. (1985). Ordinal probit: A generalization. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods, 14, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Praag, B. M. S., & Baarsma, B. E. (2005). Using happiness surveys to value intangibles: The case of airport noise. The Economic Journal, 115, 224–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Praag, B. M. S., Frijters, P. & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2003). The anatomy of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 51(1), 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkelmann, L., & Winkelmann, R. (1998). Why are the unemployed so unhappy? Evidence from panel data. Economica, 65, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkelmann, R., & Boes, S. (2006). Analysis of microdata. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank four anonymous referees, conference and seminar participants in Basel, Neuchâtel, Zurich, Lausanne, Geneva, Nottingham, Bonn, and Berlin for valuable comments. This is a substantially revised version of IZA Discussion Paper No. 1175 “Income and Happiness: New Results from Generalized Threshold and Sequential Models".

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rainer Winkelmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boes, S., Winkelmann, R. The Effect of Income on General Life Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction. Soc Indic Res 95, 111–128 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9452-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9452-7

Keywords

Navigation