Abstract
The coming out process is an important component of gay identity development (Troiden 1988) because it allows for an opportunity to overcome feelings of shame and increase self-acceptance (Eliason and Schope 2007). Given the importance of being openly gay (compared to not-openly gay), two experiments were performed. Experiment 1 examined whether heterosexual people’s evaluations of gay individuals are influenced by their outness levels. Experiment 1 recruited 295 U.S. MTurk participants who read a vignette describing either an openly gay or not-openly gay individual. Results illustrate that openly gay targets were evaluated more favorably than not-openly gay targets. Experiment 2 examined whether the reasons justifying the level of outness influence such evaluations. Experiment 2 recruited 492 U.S. MTurk participants who read a vignette describing either an openly gay or not-openly gay individual who provided one of three reasons for their outness level: being true to oneself, honesty in a relationship, and societal prejudice. Results illustrate that the more strongly participants endorsed homonegativity, the less favorably they evaluated openly gay targets. Moreover, female participants perceived societal prejudice and honesty in a relationship as better reasons for outness than being true to oneself. Understanding how levels of outness and reasons for outness can influence evaluations by heterosexual people may help gay people navigate social situations and, perhaps, make informed decisions regarding when it is a safe or possibly unsafe to disclose a gay identity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aboud, F. E. (2003). The formation of in-group favoritism and out-group prejudice in young children: Are they distinct attitudes? Developmental Psychology, 39(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.39.1.48.
Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1991-97932-000.
Ambady, N., Hallahan, M., & Conner, B. (1999). Accuracy of judgments of sexual orientation from thin slices of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(3), 538–547. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.538.
Badgett, M., Lau, H., Sears, B., & Ho, D. (2007). Bias in the workplace: Consistent evidence of sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination. UCLA: The Williams Institute https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5h3731xr.
Balliet, D., Wu, J., & De Dreu, C. K. (2014). Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1556–1581. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037737.
Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88(4), 354–364. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.354.
Birkett, M., & Espelage, D. L. (2015). Homophobic name-calling, peer-groups, and masculinity: The socialization of homophobic behavior in adolescents. Social Development, 24(1), 184–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12085.
Birkett, M., Espelage, D. L., & Koenig, B. J. (2009). LGB and questioning students in schools: The moderating effects of homophobic bullying and school climate on negative outcomes. Youth Adolescence, 38(7), 989–1000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9389-1.
Blashill, A. J., & Powlishta, K. K. (2009). Gay stereotypes: The use of sexual orientation as a cue for gender-related attributes. Sex Roles, 61(11–12), 783–793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9684-7.
Bobbio, A., & Mangenelli, A. M. (2011). Measuring social desirability responding. A short version of Paulhus’ BIDR 6. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 18(2), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-013-0270-2.
Cabin, R. J., & Mitchell, R. J. (2000). To Bonferroni or not to Bonferroni: When and how are the questions. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 81(3), 246–248 https://www.jstor.org/stable/20168454.
Human Rights Campaign. (2018). National coming out day. Retrieved from https://www.hrc.org/resources/national-coming-out-day
Clausell, E., & Roisman, G. I. (2009). Outness, big five personality traits, and same-sex relationship quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26(2–3), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509106711.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.
Coleman, E., Rosser, B. R., & Strapko, N. (1992). Sexual and intimacy dysfunction among homosexual men and women. Psychiatric Medicine, 10(2), 257–271 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1615164.
Conway, M. (2000). On sex roles and representations of emotional experience: Masculinity, femininity, and emotional awareness. Sex Roles, 43(9–10), 687–698. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007156608823.
Corrigan, P., & Matthews, A. (2003). Stigma and disclosure: Implications for coming out of the closet. Journal of Mental Health, 12(3), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963823031000118221.
Debnam, K. J., Howard, D. E., & Garza, M. A. (2014). “If you don’t have honesty in a relationship, then there is no relationship”: African American girls’ characterization of healthy dating relationships, a qualitative study. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 35(6), 397–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-014-0362-3.
Diamond, L. M. (2005). ‘I’m straight, but I kissed a girl’: The trouble with American media representations of female-female sexuality. Feminism & Psychology, 15(1), 104–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353505049712.
Diamond, L. M. (2008). Sexual fluidity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674032262.
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2011). Social role theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 458–476). Los Angeles, CA: Sage. https://www.worldcat.org/title/handbook-of-theories-of-social-psychology/oclc/751825380.
Eliason, M. J., & Schope, R. (2007). Shifting sands or solid foundation? Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender identity formation. In The health of sexual minorities (pp. 3–26). Boston, MA: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-31334-4_1.
Evans, N. J., & Broido, E. M. (1999). Coming out in college residence halls: Negotiation, meaning making, challenges, supports. Journal of College Student Development, 40(6), 658–668. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1999-15611-003.
Flores, A. (2014). National trends in public opinion on LGBT rights in the United States. The Williams Institute. https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/POP-natl-trends-nov-2014.pdf
Freeman, J. B., Johnson, K. L., Ambady, N., & Rule, N. O. (2010). Sexual orientation perception involves gendered facial cues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(10), 1318–1331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210378755.
Frost, D. M., & Meyer, I. H. (2009). Internalized homophobia and relationship quality among lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012844.
Gates, G. J. (2010). Sexual minorities in the 2008 general social survey: Coming out and demographic characteristics. UCLA: The Williams Institute. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/00d2w91k.
Hair Jr., J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan. https://www.pearson.com/us/higher-education/program/Hair-Multivariate-Data-Analysis-7th-Edition/PGM263675.html.
Herek, G. M. (1988). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: Correlates and gender differences. The Journal of Sex Research, 25(4), 451–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498809551476.
Herek, G. M. (1994). Assessing heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: A review of empirical research with the ATLG scale. In B. Greene & G. M. Herek (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on lesbian and gay issues (Vol. 1, pp. 206–228). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Herek, G. M. (2000). Sexual prejudice and gender: Do heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men differ? Journal of Social Issues, 56(2), 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00164.
Herek, G. M. (2002). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward bisexual men and women in the United States. Journal of Sex Research, 39(4), 264–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490209552150.
Hertlein, K. M., Hartwell, E. E., & Munns, M. E. (2016). Attitudes toward bisexuality according to sexual orientation and gender. Journal of Bisexuality, 16(3), 339–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299716.2016.1200510.
Hess, T. M., Bolstad, C. A., Woodburn, S. M., & Auman, C. (1999). Trait diagnosticity versus behavioral consistency as determinants of impression change in adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 14(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.14.1.77.
Kawachi, I., & Berkman, L. F. (2001). Social ties and mental health. Journal of Urban Health, 78(3), 458–467. https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/78.3.458.
Kerns, J. G., & Fine, M. A. (1994). The relation between gender and negative attitudes toward gay men and lesbians: Do gender role attitudes mediate this relation? Sex Roles, 31(5–6), 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544590.
Kimmel, M. S. (2004). Masculinity as homophobia: Fear, shame, and silence in the construction of gender identity. In P. Murphy (Ed.), Feminism and masculinities, (pp. 81–93). https://mensstudies.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Peter-Murphy-Feminism-masculinities.pdf.
Kite, M. E., & Bryant-Lees, K. B. (2016). Historical and contemporary attitudes toward homosexuality. Teaching of Psychology, 43(2), 164–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628316636297.
Kite, M. E., & Whitley, B. E. (1996). Sex differences in attitudes toward homosexual persons, behaviors, and civil rights a meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(4), 336–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296224002.
Knoble, N. B., & Linville, D. (2012). Outness and relationship satisfaction in same-gender couples. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38(2), 330–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2010.00206.
Kosciw, J. G., Greytak, E. A., Bartkiewicz, M. J., Boesen, M. J., & Palmer, N. A. (2012). The 2011 National School Climate Survey: The experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth in our nation’s schools. New York: Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network. https://www.glsen.org/sites/default/files/2011%20National%20School%20Climate%20Survey%20Full%20Report.pdf.
Kosciw, J. G., Palmer, N. A., & Kull, R. M. (2015). Reflecting resiliency: Openness about sexual orientation and/or gender identity and its relationship to well-being and educational outcomes for LGBT students. American Journal of Community Psychology, 55(1–2), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-014-9642-6.
Legate, N., Ryan, R. M., & Weinstein, N. (2012). Is coming out always a “good thing”? Exploring the relations of autonomy support, outness, and wellness for lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(2), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F1948550611411929.
Lehavot, K., & Lambert, A. J. (2007). Toward a greater understanding of antigay prejudice: On the role of sexual orientation and gender role violation. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29(3), 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973530701503390.
Levant, R. F., Richmond, K., Majors, R. G., Inclan, J. E., Rossello, J. M., Heesacker, M., … Sellers, A. (2003). A multicultural investigation of masculinity ideology and alexithymia. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 4(2), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.4.2.91.
Louderback, L. A., & Whitley, B. E. (1997). Perceived erotic value of homosexuality and sex-role attitudes as mediators of sex differences in heterosexual college students’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. The Journal of Sex Research, 34(2), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499709551882.
Marks, M. J., & Fraley, R. C. (2005). The sexual double standard: Fact or fiction? Sex Roles, 52(3/4), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-1293-5.
Marks, M. J., Young, T. M., & Zaikman, Y. (2019). The sexual double standard in the real world: Evaluations of sexually active friends and acquaintances. Social Psychology, 50(2), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000362.
Meyer, I. H., & Dean, L. (1998). Internalized homophobia, intimacy, and sexual behavior among gay and bisexual men. Psychological Perspectives on Lesbian and Gay Issues, 4, 160–186. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243818.n8.
Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Mohr, J. J., & Fassinger, R. E. (2000). Measuring dimensions of lesbian and gay male experience. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 33, 66–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/t07099-000.
Mohr, J. J., Jackson, S. D., & Sheets, R. L. (2017). Sexual orientation self-presentation among bisexual-identified women and men: Patterns and predictors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(5), 1465–1479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0808-1.
Moradi, B., Wiseman, M. C., DeBlaere, C., Goodman, M. B., Sarkees, A., Brewster, M. E., … Huang, Y. (2010). LGB of color and white individuals’ perceptions of heterosexist stigma, internalized homophobia, and outness: Comparisons of levels and links. The Counseling Psychologist, 38(3), 397–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000009335263.
Morris, J. F., Waldo, C. R., & Rothblum, E. D. (2001). A model of predictors and outcomes of outness among lesbian and bisexual women. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 71(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/0002-9432.71.1.61.
Morrison, M. A., & Morrison, T. G. (2011). Sexual orientation bias toward gay men and lesbian women: Modern homonegative attitudes and their association with discriminatory behavioral intentions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(11), 2573–2599. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00838.x.
Moskowitz, D. A., Rieger, G., & Roloff, M. E. (2010). Heterosexual attitudes toward same-sex marriage. Journal of Homosexuality, 57(2), 325–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918360903489176.
Muehlheusser, G., Roider, A., & Wallmeier, N. (2015). Gender differences in honesty: Groups versus individuals. Economics Letters, 128, 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2014.12.019.
Nierman, A. J., Thompson, S. C., Bryan, A., & Mahaffey, A. L. (2007). Gender role beliefs and attitudes toward lesbians and gay men in Chile and the US. Sex Roles, 57(1–2), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9197-1.
Norton, A. T., & Herek, G. M. (2013). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward transgender people: Findings from a national probability sample of U.S. adults. Sex Roles, 68(11–12), 738–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0110-6.
Olsen, J., & Inglehart, M. (2011). Malocclusions and perceptions of attractiveness, intelligence, and personality, and behavioral intentions. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 140(5), 669–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.02.025.
Orne, J. (2011). ‘You will always have to “out” yourself’: Reconsidering coming out through strategic outness. Sexualities, 14(6), 681–703. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460711420462.
Ozturk, M. B. (2011). Sexual orientation discrimination: Exploring the experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual employees in Turkey. Human Relations, 64(8), 1099–1118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726710396249.
Parrott, D. J., & Gallagher, K. E. (2008). What accounts for heterosexual women’s negative emotional responses to lesbians?: Examination of traditional gender role beliefs and sexual prejudice. Sex Roles, 59(3–4), 229–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9436-0.
Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Personality Processes and Individual Differences, 46(3), 598–609. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.598.
Plummer, D. (2016). One of the boys: Masculinity, homophobia, and modern manhood. New York: The Haworth Press. https://www.worldcat.org/title/one-of-the-boys-masculinity-homophobia-and-modern-manhood/oclc/41452720.
Rice, W. R. (1989). Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution, 43(1), 223–225.
Rudman, L. A., Feinberg, J., & Fairchild, K. (2002). Minority members’ implicit attitudes: Automatic ingroup bias as a function of group status. Social Cognition, 20(4), 294–320. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.20.4.294.19908.
Rule, N. O., & Ambady, N. (2008). Brief exposures: Male sexual orientation is accurately perceived at 50 ms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(4), 1100–1105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.12.001.
Rust, P. C. (1993). “Coming out” in the age of social constructionism: Sexual identity formation among lesbian and bisexual women. Gender & Society, 7(1), 50–77. https://doi.org/10.1300/J155v01n01_04.
Schwartz, S. H., & Rubel-Lifschitz, T. (2009). Cross-national variation in the size of sex differences in values: Effects of gender equality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015546.
Smiler, A. P. (2006). Conforming to masculine norms: Evidence for validity among adult men and women. Sex Roles, 54(11–12), 767–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9045-8.
Tilcsik, A. (2011). Pride and prejudice: Employment discrimination against openly gay men in the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 117(2), 586–626. https://doi.org/10.1086/661653.
Troiden, R. R. (1979). Becoming homosexual: A model of gay identity acquisition. Psychiatry, 42(4), 362–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1979.11024039.
Troiden, R. R. (1988). Homosexual identity development. Journal of Adolescent Health Care, 9(2), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-0070(88)90056-3.
Tyler, J. M., Feldman, R. S., & Reichert, A. (2006). The price of deceptive behavior: Disliking and lying to people who lie to us. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(1), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.02.003.
Van Leeuwen, E., Van Knippenberg, D., & Ellemers, N. (2003). Continuing and changing group identities: The effects of merging on social identification and ingroup bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(6), 679–690. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203029006001.
Vokey, M., Tefft, B., & Tysiaczny, C. (2013). An analysis of hyper-masculinity in magazine advertisements. Sex Roles, 68(9–10), 562–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0268-1.
Waldner, L. K., & Magrader, B. (1999). Coming out to parents: Perceptions of family relations, perceived resources, and identity expression as predictors of identity disclosure for gay and lesbian adolescents. Journal of Homosexuality, 37(2), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v37n02_05.
Wang, C. S., Galinsky, A. D., & Murnighan, J. K. (2009). Bad drives psychological reactions, but good propels behavior: Responses to honesty and deception. Psychological Science, 20(5), 634–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02344.x.
Wells, J. W., & Kline, W. B. (1987). Self-disclosure of homosexual orientation. The Journal of Social Psychology, 127(2), 191–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1987.9713679.
Wilkerson, J. M., Smolenski, D. J., Brady, S. S., & Rosser, B. S. (2012). Religiosity, internalized homonegativity and outness in Christian men who have sex with men. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 27(2), 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2012.698259.
Yost, M. R., & Thomas, G. D. (2012). Gender and binegativity: Men’s and women’s attitudes toward male and female bisexuals. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(3), 691–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9767-8.
Zaikman, Y., & Marks, M. J. (2016). The influence of physical appearance and personality on the exhibition of the sexual double standard. Sexuality & Culture, 20(2), 255–276.
Zaikman, Y., Marks, M. J., Young, T. M., & Zeiber, J. A. (2016). Gender role violations and the sexual double standard. Journal of Homosexuality, 63(12), 1608–1629. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2016.1158007.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Dr. Michael Marks for his feedback on an earlier draft.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
The research presented in the manuscript was conducted according to the ethical standards of the APA and the New Mexico State University IRB.
Informed Consent
Principal Investigator: Yuliana Zaikman Graduate Psychology Student Department of Psychology New Mexico State University Contact: yzaikman@nmsu.edu
Co-Investigator: Jacqueline Zeiber Graduate Psychology Student Department of Psychology New Mexico State University Contact: jzeiber@nmsu.edu
Faculty Advisor: Michael Marks Associate Professor Department of Psychology New Mexico State University Contact: mmarks@nmsu.edu
DESCRIPTION: We are interested in examining the various attitudes that are evident within society. This research will involve you answering various demographic questions as well as questions about your beliefs and sexuality. This survey includes “attention check” questions to make sure you are paying full attention to the survey. Failing the “attention check” questions will result in no compensation. 15 cents ($.15) will be awarded to participants complete the “attention check” questions and the rest of the survey. Overall, it should take you no more than 10 min to complete the entire survey.
INCLUSION CRITERIA: You need to be from the United States in order to be eligible for participation in this study.
CONFIDENTIALITY: All information obtained in this study will be completely anonymous. While responses will be recorded online via SurveyMonkey and kept in a secure, password protected database for seven years, they will be in no way associated with any identifying information. Neither your name nor worker id will be attached to your responses. Any information from this study that is published will not identify you by name or worker id.
RISKS & BENEFITS: You will have the opportunity to learn more about psychological research. The results of this study will help further our understanding of how attitudes are evident within society. There are no known risks associated with your completion of this survey. However, you may find some of the questions particularly personal in that some of the questions may cause you to feel uncomfortable and/or anxious; if this is the case, you may skip these questions.
CONTACT PEOPLE: If you have any questions about this research, please contact the Principal Investigator at the email listed above. If you have any questions about your rights as a research subject, please contact the Institutional Review Board (IRB) Chair, through the Office of Compliance at New Mexico State University at (575) 646–7177 or at ovpr@nmsu.edu. If needed, counseling and/or mental health services are available for free through the Crisis Call Center, 1–800–273-8255.
VOLUNTARY NATURE OF PARTICIPATION: Your participation in this study is voluntary. If you don’t wish to participate, or would like to end your participation in this research study, there will be no penalty or loss of benefits to you to which you are otherwise entitled. In other words, you are free to make your own choice about being in this study or not, and may quit at any time without penalty.
SIGNATURE: Clicking next, indicates that you indicates that you are 18 years old or older, fully understand the above research study, what is being asked of you in this study, and that you are completing this study voluntarily.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 602 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zaikman, Y., Stimatze, T. & Zeiber, J.A. Women’s and Men’s Evaluations of Lesbians and Gay Men and their Levels of Outness. Sex Roles 83, 211–225 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01107-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01107-y