Abstract
The current research examined whether visuospatial recall of both abstract and common objects was related to gender or object familiarity. Seventy two undergraduates from a university in the Southern U.S. were asked to draw the Rey Complex Figure and a series of common objects from memory. A pilot sample of seventy three undergraduates had previously identified common objects as “male” “female” and “neutral” exemplars. Males were significantly better at drawing “male” and “neutral” exemplars whereas females were better at drawing “female” exemplars. Neither gender was significantly better at the Rey task. These results question whether males have an inherent advantage in visual memory. Results also found that experience with playing violent video games was associated with higher visual memory recall.
References
Anderson, C., & Dill, K. (2000). Video games and aggressive thoughts, feelings and behavior in the laboratory and in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 772–790.
Baenninger, M., & Newcombe, N. (1995). Environmental input to the development of sex-related differences in spatial and mathematical ability. Learning and Individual Differences, 7, 363–379.
Carroll, J. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Castel, A., Pratt, J., & Drummond, E. (2005). The effects of action video game experience on the time course of inhibition of return and the efficiency of visual search. Acta Psychologica, 119, 217–230.
Cherney, I., & Collaer, M. (2005). Sex differences in line judgment: Relation to mathematics preparation and strategy use. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 100, 615–627.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
Collaer, M., & Hill, E. (2006). Large sex difference in adolescents on a timed line judgment task: Attentional contributors and task relationship to mathematics. Perception, 35, 561–572.
De Lisi, R., & Wolford, J. (2002). Improving children’s mental rotation accuracy with computer game playing. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163, 272–282.
Graf, P., & Ryan, L. (1990). Transfer-appropriate processing for implicit and explicit memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 16, 978–992.
Green, S., & Bavelier, D. (2003). Action video game modifies visual selective attention. Nature, 423, 534–537.
Green, S., & Bavelier, D. (2006). Enumeration versus multiple object tracking: The case of action video game players. Cognition, 101, 217–245.
Griffiths, M., & Hunt, N. (1996). Computer game playing in adolescence: Prevalence and demographic indicators. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 5, 189–193.
Halpern, D. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities. Mahweh, NJ: Erlbaum.
Halpern, D., & Collaer, M. (2005). Sex differences in visuospatial abilities: More than meets the eyes. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hennessey, J., Hockfield, S., & Tilghman, S. (2005). Women and science: The real issue. Retrieved 11/12/06 from http://www.boston.com/news/education/higher/articles/2005/02/12/women_and_science_the_real_issue/.
Kato, P. M., & Beale, I. L. (2006). Factors affecting acceptability to young cancer patients of a psychoeducational video game about cancer. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 23(5), 269–275.
Livesey, D., & Intili, D. (1996). A gender difference in visual-spatial ability in 4-year-old children: Effects on performance of a kinesthetic acuity task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 436–446.
Meyers, J., & Meyers, K. (1995). Rey complex figure test under four different administration procedures. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 9, 63–67.
Morris, D. (1999). The naked ape: A zoologist’s study of the human animal. New York: Delta.
National Organization of Women (2005). NOW calls for resignation of Harvard University’s President. Retrieved 11/12/06 from http://wiseli.engr.wisc.edu/news/NOW.pdf.
Nyberg, H. (2005). Sex-related differences in general intelligence g, brain size, and social status. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 497–509.
Parsons, T., Larson, P., Kranz K., Thiebaux, M., Bluestein, B., & Buckwalter, G., et al. (2004). Sex differences in mental rotation and spatial rotation in a virtual environment. Neuropsychologia, 42, 555–562.
Pinker, S., & Spelke, E. (2005). The science of gender and science: Pinker vs. Spelke. Edge: The third culture. Retrieved 9/4/07 from http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/debate05/debate05_index.html.
Roediger, H. (1990). Implicit memory: Retention without remembering. American Psychologist, 45, 1043–1056.
Rosser, J., Lynch, P., Cuddihy, L., Gentile, D., Klonsky, J., & Merrell, R. (2007). The impact of video games on training surgeons in the 21st century. Archives of Surgery, 142, 181–186.
Silverman, I., & Eals, M. (1992). Sex differences in spatial ability: Evolutionary theory and data. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.) The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 531–549). New York: Oxford Press.
Sims, V., & Mayer, R. (2002). Domain specificity of spatial expertise: The case of video game players. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 97–115.
Spreen, O., & Strauss, E. (1998). A compendium of neuropsychological tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Summers, L. (2005). Diversifying the science and engineering workforce. Discussion presented at the NBER Conference on Diversifying the Science and Engineering Workforce, Cambridge, MA.
Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250–270.
Yi, S., & Lee, S. (1997). Video game experience and children’s abilities of self-control and visual information processing. Korean Journal of Child Studies, 18, 105–120.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ferguson, C.J., Cruz, A.M. & Rueda, S.M. Gender, Video Game Playing Habits and Visual Memory Tasks. Sex Roles 58, 279–286 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9332-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9332-z