Abstract
The comparison of two universities in terms of bibliometric indicators frequently faces the problem of assessing the differences as meaningful or not. This Letter to the Editor proposes some benchmarks which can be used for supporting the interpretation of institutional differences.
References
Bornmann, L., & Glänzel, W. (2017). Applying the CSS method to bibliometric indicators used in (university) rankings. Scientometrics, 110(2), 1077–1079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2198-5.
Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., & Daniel, H.-D. (2013). A multilevel-statistical reformulation of citation-based university rankings: The Leiden Ranking 2011/2012. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(8), 1649–1658.
Glänzel, W., Debackere, K., & Thijs, B. (2016). Citation classes: A novel indicator base to classify scientific output. Retrieved October, 21, 2016, from https://www.oecd.org/sti/051%20-%20Blue%20Sky%20Biblio%20Submitted.pdf.
Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (1988). Characteristic scores and scales in assessing citation impact. Journal of Information Science, 14(2), 123–127.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bornmann, L., Glänzel, W. Which differences can be expected when two universities in the Leiden Ranking are compared? Some benchmarks for institutional research evaluations. Scientometrics 115, 1101–1105 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2700-3
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2700-3