Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Mapping knowledge structure by keyword co-occurrence: a first look at journal papers in Technology Foresight

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study proposes an approach for visualizing a knowledge structure, the proposed approach creates a three-dimensional “Research focused parallelship network”, a “Keyword Co-occurrence Network”, and a two-dimensional knowledge map to facilitate visualization of the knowledge structure created by journal papers from different perspectives. The networks and knowledge maps can be depicted differently by choosing different information as the network actor, e.g. author, institute or country keyword, to reflect knowledge structures in micro-, meso-, and macro-levels, respectively. Technology Foresight is selected as an example to illustrate the method proposed in this study. A total of 556 author keywords contained in 181 Technology Foresight related papers have been analyzed. European countries, China, India and Brazil are located at the core of Technology Foresight research. Quantitative ways of mapping journal papers are investigated in this study to unveil emerging elements as well as to demonstrate dynamics and visualization of knowledge. The quantitative method provided in this paper shows a possible way of visualizing and evaluating knowledge structure; thus a computerized calculation is possible for potential quantitative applications, e.g. R&D resource allocation, research performance evaluation, science map, etc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alsan, A., & Oner, M. A. (2003). An integrated view of foresight: Integrated foresight management model. Foresight, 5, 33–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amsteus, M. (2008). Managerial foresight: Concept and measurement. Foresight, 10, 53–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, C., Hughes, J., Hope, T., Jacoby, R., & Ziebland, S. (2003). Ethics and dementia: Mapping the literature by bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 18, 41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, S., & Basu, P. K. (1998). Mapping a research area at the micro level using co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 43, 359–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brass, D. J., & Burkhardt, M. E. (1992). Centrality and power in organizations. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action, 191, 215.

  • Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., & Laville, F. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics, 22, 155–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cambrosio, A., Limoges, C., Courtial, J. P., & Laville, F. (1993). Historical scientometrics? Mapping over 70 years of biological safety research with coword analysis. Scientometrics, 27, 119–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, W. T., & Ho, Y. S. (2007). Bibliometric analysis of tsunami research. Scientometrics, 73, 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, W. T., Huang, J. S., & Ho, Y. S. (2004). Bibliometric analysis of severe acute respiratory syndrome-related research in the beginning stage. Scientometrics, 61, 69–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A., Gatineau, M., Thorogood, M., & Wyn-Roberts, N. (2007). Health promotion research literature in Europe 1995–2005. The European Journal of Public Health, 17, 24–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, N., Monarch, I., & Konda, S. (1998). Software engineering as seen through its research literature: A study in co-word analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 1206–1223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courtial, J. P. (1994). A coword analysis of scientometrics. Scientometrics, 31, 251–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuhls, K., Breiner, S., & Grupp, H. (1995). Delphi-Bericht 1995 zur Entwicklung von Wissenschaft und Technik-Mini-Delphi. Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer-Institut ISI (auch herausgegeben als BMBF-Brosch\üre, Bonn 1996).

  • Czaplicka-Kolarz, K., Stańczyk, K., & Kapusta, K. (2009). Technology foresight for a vision of energy sector development in Poland till 2030. Delphi survey as an element of technology foresighting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76, 327–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalkey, N. C. (1969). The Delphi method: An experimental study of group opinion. Santa Monica: RAND Corp.

  • De Looze, M. A., & Lemarié, J. (1997). Corpus relevance through co-word analysis: An application to plant proteints. Scientometrics, 39, 267–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G. G., & Foo, S. (2001). Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis. Information Processing and Management, 37, 817–842.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11, 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavigan, J. P., & Scapolo, F. (1999). A comparison of national foresight exercises. Foresight, 1, 495–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grupp, H., & Linstone, H. A. (1999). National technology foresight activities around the globe: An experimental study of group opinion. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 60, 85–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, B. M., & Bhattacharya, S. (2004). A bibliometric approach towards mapping the dynamics of science and technology. DESIDOC Bulletin of Information Technology, 24, 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havas, A. (2003). Evolving foresight in a small transition economy. Journal of Forecasting, 22, 179–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmer, O., & Rescher, N. (1959). On the epistemology of the inexact sciences, Management Science, 25–52.

  • Hinze, S. (1994). Bibliographical cartography of an emerging interdisciplinary discipline: The case of bioelectronics. Scientometrics, 29, 353–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, Y. S. (2007). Bibliometric Analysis of Adsorption Technology in Environmental Science. Journal of Environmental Protection Science, 1, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, J., & Martin, B. R. (1984). Foresight in science: Picking the winners. London: Pinter.

  • Kajikawa, Y., & Takeda, Y. (2008). Structure of research on biomass and bio-fuels: A citation-based approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75, 1349–1359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kajikawa, Y., & Takeda, Y. (2009). Citation network analysis of organic LEDs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76, 1115–1123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kajikawa, Y., Yoshikawa, J., Takeda, Y., & Matsushima, K. (2008). Tracking emerging technologies in energy research: Toward a roadmap for sustainable energy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75, 771–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A., Skogstad, A. L., & Girshick, M. A. (1950). The prediction of social and technological events. Public Opinion Quarterly, 14, 93–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, M., & Popper, R. (2008). Comparing foresight ‘style’ in six world regions. Foresight, 10, 16–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostoff, R. N. (2008a). Literature-related discovery (LRD): Introduction and background. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75, 165–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostoff, R. N. (2008b). Literature-related discovery (LRD): Potential treatments for cataracts. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75, 215–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostoff, R. N. (2008c). Comparison of China/USA science and technology performance. Journal of Informetrics, 2, 354–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostoff, R. N., Antonio del Río, J., Cortés, H. D., Smith, C., Smith, A., Wagner, C., et al. (2005a). The structure and infrastructure of Mexico’s science and technology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72, 798–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostoff, R. N., Bhattacharya, S., & Pecht, M. (2007a). Assessment of China’s and India’s science and technology literature—introduction, background, and approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74, 1519–1538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostoff, R. N., Block, J. A., Solka, J. L., Briggs, M. B., Rushenberg, R. L., Stump, J. A., et al. (2008a). Literature-related discovery (LRD): Lessons learned, and future research directions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75, 276–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostoff, R. N., & Briggs, M. B. (2008). Literature-related discovery (LRD): Potential treatments for Parkinson’s disease. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75, 226–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostoff, R. N., Briggs, M. B., & Lyons, T. J. (2008c). Literature-related discovery (LRD): Potential treatments for multiple sclerosis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75, 239–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostoff, R. N., Briggs, M. B., Rushenberg, R. L., Bowles, C. A., Icenhour, A. S., Nikodym, K. F., et al. (2007c). Chinese science and technology—structure and infrastructure. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74, 1539–1573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostoff, R. N., Briggs, M. B., Rushenberg, R. L., Bowles, C. A., Pecht, M., Johnson, D., et al. (2007d). Comparisons of the structure and infrastructure of Chinese and Indian Science and Technology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74, 1609–1630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostoff, R. N., Briggs, M. B., Solka, J. L., & Rushenberg, R. L. (2008b). Literature-related discovery (LRD): Methodology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75, 186–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostoff, R. N., Eberhart, H. J., & Toothman, D. R. (1998). Database tomography for technical intelligence: A roadmap of the near-earth space science and technology literature. Information Processing and Management, 34, 69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostoff, R. N., Johnson, D., Bowles, C. A., Bhattacharya, S., Icenhour, A. S., Nikodym, K., et al. (2007b). Assessment of India’s research literature. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74, 1574–1608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostoff, R. N., Koytcheff, R. G., & Lau, C. G. (2007e). Global nanotechnology research literature overview. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74, 1733–1747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostoff, R. N., Solka, J. L., Rushenberg, R. L., & Wyatt, J. A. (2008d). Literature-related discovery (LRD): Water purification. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75, 256–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostoff, R. N., Tshiteya, R., Pfeil, K. M., & Humenik, J. A. (2002). Electrochemical power text mining using bibliometrics and database tomography. Journal of Power Sources, 110, 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostoff, R. N., Tshiteya, R., Pfeil, K. M., Humenik, J. A., & Karypis, G. (2005b). Power source roadmaps using bibliometrics and database tomography. Energy, 30, 709–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. USA: University of Chicago.

  • Landeta, J. (2006). Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73, 467–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, P.-C., Su, H.-N., & Wu, F.-S. (2009). Quantitative mapping of patented technology—the case of electrical conducting polymer nanocomposite. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77, 466–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, T., Ho, Y. S., & Li, C. Y. (2008). Bibliometric analysis on global Parkinson’s disease research trends during 1991–2006. Neuroscience Letters, 441, 248–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (1975). Delphi method: Techniques and applications. USA: Addison-Wesley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Loveridge, D., Georghiou, L., & Nedeva, M. (1995). United Kingdom Technology Foresight Programme Delphi Survey.

  • Martin, B. R., & Johnston, R. (1999). Technology foresight for wiring up the national innovation system: Experiences in Britain, Australia, and New Zealand. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 60, 37–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mu, R. P., Ren, Z. B., Yuan, S. D., & Yuan, Q. (2008). Technology foresight towards 2020 in China: The practice and its impacts. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 20, 287–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NISTEP. (2005). NISTEP Report No. 94–98: The 8th Science and Technology Foresight Survey. NISTEP.

  • Noyons, E. C. M., & Van Raan, A. F. J. (1994). Bibliometric cartography of scientific and technological developments of an R&D field. Scientometrics, 30, 157–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noyons, E. C. M., & Van Raan, A. F. J. (1998). Monitoring scientific developments from a dynamic perspective: Self-organized structuring to map neural network research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 68–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rikken, F., Kiers, H. A. L., & Vos, R. (1995). Mapping the dynamics of adverse drug reactions in subsequent time periods using INDSCAL. Scientometrics, 33, 367–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rip, A., & Courtial, J. P. (1984). Co-word maps of biotechnology: An example of cognitive scientometrics. Scientometrics, 6, 381–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saritas, O., Taymaz, E., & Tumer, T. (2007). Vision 2023: Turkey’s National Technology Foresight Program: A contextualist analysis and discussion. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74, 1374–1393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlossstein, D., & Park, B. (2006). Comparing recent technology foresight studies in Korea and China: Towards foresight-minded governments? Foresight, 8, 48–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian, Y., Wen, C., & Hong, S. (2008). Global scientific production on GIS research by bibliometric analysis from 1997 to 2006. Journal of Informetrics, 2, 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2007). Bibliometric mapping of the computational intelligence field. International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge Based Systems, 15, 625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Raan, A. F. J., & Tijssen, R. J. W. (1993). The neural net of neural network research: An exercise in bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics (Print), 26, 169–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikipedia. (2009). Wikipedia.

  • Wild, C., & Torgersen, H. (2000). Foresight in medicine Lessons from three European Delphi studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Yang, Q. Q., Gong, Z. M., Cheng, J. Y., & Wang, G. (2004). Technology foresight and critical technology selection in China. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 1, 168–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Science and Technology Policy Research and Information Center, National Applied Research Laboratories, 14F, No. 106, Sec. 2, He-Ping E. Rd., Taipei, 106, Taiwan

    Hsin-Ning Su & Pei-Chun Lee

  2. Graduate Institute of Technology and Innovation Management, National Chengchi University, 64, Sec. 2, Chih-nan Rd., Wenshan, Taipei, 116, Taiwan

    Pei-Chun Lee

  3. SPRU—Science and Technology Policy Research, The Freeman Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QE, UK

    Pei-Chun Lee

Authors
  1. Hsin-Ning Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pei-Chun Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pei-Chun Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Su, HN., Lee, PC. Mapping knowledge structure by keyword co-occurrence: a first look at journal papers in Technology Foresight. Scientometrics 85, 65–79 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0259-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0259-8

Keywords