Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Photoelectric Effect: Reconstructing the Story for the Physics Classroom

  • Editorial
  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The photoelectric effect is commonly used as the introductory topic for the study of quantum physics. However, a literature review reveals that besides various weaknesses and errors in the presentation of the history of the photoelectric effect, textbook presentations also contain incorrect presentations of the work function and the photon concept. In this paper, I present, in story form, five key episodes of the history of the photoelectric effect that are necessary for its accurate and adequate portrayal: (a) the discovery of the photoelectric effect, (b) the characterization of and initial explanation for the photoelectric effect, (c) Einstein’s revolutionary paper on the light quantum and its explanation for the photoelectric effect, and his, eventually, receiving the Nobel Prize despite not having his hypothesis accepted, (d) Millikan’s experimental verification of Einstein’s photoelectric equation despite not accepting Einstein’s hypothesis, and (e) Compton’s measurements and his theoretical explanation which produced the ultimate acceptance of Einstein’s hypothesis. The story, entitled “The Birth of the Photon Concept,” has been tested in a classroom setting and is proposed as an essential component in the process of developing sound instructional materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For a discussion of another theory of the photoelectric effect, that of Richardson, see Katzir 2006.

References

  • Acolyte Science. (2008). Der Lichtelektrische Effekt. Available online. http://www.acolytescience.co.uk/origins/herz.html. Accessed 11 May 2009.

  • Armstrong, H. L. (1983). No place for a photon? American Journal of Physics, 51(2), 103–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacciagaluppi, G., Valentini, A. (2006). Quantum theory at the crossroads: Reconsidering the 1927 Solvay conference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, arXiv:quant-ph/0609184v1.

  • Berger, S. B. (1981). Comment on the localization of the photon. American Journal of Physics, 49(2), 106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohr, N. (1922). The structure of the atom. Nobel lecture, December 11, 1922. Available online. http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1922/bohr-lecture.html. Accessed 11 May 2009.

  • Bohr, N. (1925). Bohr to Fowler, April 21, 1925; In K. Stolzenburg (Ed.) (1984) Niels Bohr collected works, Vol. 5. The emergence of quantum mechanics (Mainly 1924–1926). North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 81–82.

  • Bryant, J. H. (1998). Heinrich Hertz’s experiments and experimental apparatus: His discovery of radio waves and his delineation of their properties. In D. Baird, R. I. G. Hughes, & A. Nordman (Eds.), Heinrich Hertz: Classical physicist, modern philosopher. Boston studies in the philosophy of science, V. 198 (pp. 39–58). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • California Institute of Technology. (1987). Video series: The mechanical universe and beyond. Program 24: Particles and waves.

  • Einstein, A. (1905). Über einen dir Erzeugung und Versandlung des Lichtes betreffenden heuristischen Gesichtspunkt. Ann Physik 17:132–148. Translated into english in: Einstein, A. (1905). Concerning an heuristic point of view toward the emission and transformation of light. American Journal of Physics, 33(5), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A. (1916). Einstein to Besso, September 6, 1916. In P. Speziali (Ed.) and transl Albert Einstein–Michele Besso correspondence 1903–1955 (p. 82). Paris: Herman.

  • Einstein, A. (1925). Einstein to Ehrenfest, August 18, 1925. In M. J. Klein (1970). The first phase of the Bohr-Einstein dialogue. Historical studies in the physical sciences, 2, 1–39.

  • Einstein, A. (1951). Einstein to Besso, December 12, 1951. In P. Speziali (Ed.) and transl (1972) Albert Einstein–Michele Besso correspondence 1903–1955 (p. 453). Paris: Herman.

  • Freeman, G. R. (1984). What are photons and electrons? American Journal of Physics, 52(1), 11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunther, H. J., Beretta, G. B. (2005). Towards practical design rules for quantum communications and quantum imaging devices. Proceedings 5893 of optics and photonics: quantum communications and quantum imaging III, San Diego, Jul 31–Aug 4, 2005.

  • Hodgson, E. R., & Lambert, R. K. (1975). Photoelectric effect. Physics Education, 10(2), 123–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, A. L., & DuBridge, L. A. (1932). Photoelectric Phenomena. New York and London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, A. N. (1973). Photoelectric effect, a common fundamental error. Physics Education, 8(6), 382–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. G. C. (1991). Teaching modern physics—misconceptions of the photon that can damage understanding. Physics Education, 26(2), 93–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katzir, S. (2006). Thermodynamic deduction versus quantum revolution: The failure of Richardson’s theory of the photoelectric effect. Annals of Science, 63(4), 447–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keesing, R. G. (1981). The measurement of Planck’s constant using the visible photoelectric effect. European Journal of Physics, 2, 139–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keesing, R. G. (2002). Einstein, Millikan and the Photoelectric Effect. Newsletter of the Open University Physics Society, 1(4), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidd, R., Ardini, J., & Anton, A. (1989). Evolution of the modern photon. American Journal of Physics, 57(1), 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsten, G., & Körber, H.-G. (Eds.). (1975). Physiker über Physiker. Wahlvorschläge zur Aufnahme von Physikern in die Berliner Akademie 1870 bis 1929. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, R. D. (2004). Physics for scientists and engineers with modern physics: A strategic approach. San Francisco: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, S. (2009). The construction and analysis of a science story: A proposed methodology. Science & Education, 18(3–4), 401–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kragh, H. (1992). A sense of history: History of science and the teaching of introductory quantum theory. Science & Education, 1, 349–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, G. N. (1926). The conservation of photons. Nature, 118, 874–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mencken, H. L. (1917). The divine afflatus. New York evening mail, November 16, 1917. Reprinted in: Mencken, H. L. (1949). A Mencken Chrestomathy. Random House, New York, p. 443.

  • Millikan, R. (1950). The autobiography of Robert A Millikan. New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milonni, P. W. (1997). Answer to question #45: “What (if anything) does the photoelectric effect teach us?”. American Journal of Physics, 65(1), 11–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niaz, M., Klassen, S., McMillan, B., Metz, D. (2009). Reconstruction of the history of the photoelectric effect and its implications for general physics textbooks. Submitted to Science Education.

  • Rigden, J. S. (2005). Einstein’s revolutionary paper. Physics World, 18, 18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roychoudhuri, C., Tirfessa, N. (2006, Oct). Do we count individual photons or discrete quantum events experienced by detectors? Proceedings of the SPIE Photonics East Conference: Advanced photon counting techniques, Vol. 6372, paper no. 29, 1–3.

  • Rudnick, J., & Tannhauser, D. S. (1976). Concerning a widespread error in the description of the photoelectric effect. American Journal of Physics, 44(8), 796–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, R. Q. (1996). Question #45. What (if anything) does the photoelectric effect teach us? American Journal of Physics, 64(7), 839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, R. N., Oberem, G. E., & McDermott, L. C. (1996). Development of a computer-based tutorial on the photoelectric effect. American Journal of Physics, 64(11), 1370–1379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strnad, J. (1986). Photons in introductory quantum physics. American Journal of Physics, 54(7), 650–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuewer, R. (2006). Einstein’s revolutionary light-quantum hypothesis. Acta Physica Polonica B, 37(3), 543–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulcs, S. (2003). The nature of light and twentieth century experimental physics. Foundations of Science, 8, 356–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, W. R. (1937). The photoelectric determination of h as an undergraduate experiment. American Journal of Physics, 5(2), 65–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeilinger, A., Weihs, G., Jennewein, T., & Aspelmeyer, M. (2005). Happy centenary, photon. Nature, 433, 230–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The researching, writing, and presenting of this paper was made possible, in part, through funding provided by NSERC CRYSTAL at the University of Manitoba, the Maurice Price Foundation, and the University of Winnipeg.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Klassen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klassen, S. The Photoelectric Effect: Reconstructing the Story for the Physics Classroom. Sci & Educ 20, 719–731 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-009-9214-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-009-9214-6

Keywords