Skip to main content
Log in

The Choice between Bank Debt and Trace Credit in Business Start-ups

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 26 June 2007

Abstract

This paper investigates the choice between bank debt and trade credit in business start-ups. While trade credit is more expensive than bank debt, suppliers tend to follow a more lenient liquidation policy when client firms encounter financial distress. As a result, suppliers are more willing to renegotiate the outstanding debt or grant additional debt whereas banks are more likely to liquidate borrowers upon default. Given the risky nature of business start-ups, we argue that the entrepreneur’s choice of debt instruments reflects these differences in liquidation policy between lenders and is thus determined by the venture’s failure risk, the entrepreneur’s private control benefits that are lost upon liquidation and the liquidation value of firm assets. Using unique data on 325 first-time business start-ups, we find that firms in industries with high historical start-up failure rates and entrepreneurs who tend to highly value private benefits of control use less bank debt. These effects are especially prevalent in start-ups where assets have a high liquidation value and thus banks are more likely to liquidate the venture following default.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrawal A., Narayanan N. J., 1990, ‹Corporate Capital Structure, Agency Costs, and Ownership Control: The Case of All-Equity Firms’ Journal of Finance 45(4): 1325–1331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ang J., Cole R., Lin J., 2000, ‹Agency Costs and Ownership Structure’ Journal of Finance 55(1): 81–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armendariz de Aghion B., 1990, ‹International Debt: An Explanation of the Commercial Banks’ Lending Behavior after 1982’ Journal of International Economics 28(1–2): 173–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch D. B., Mahmood T. 1994, ‹The Rate of Hazard Confronting New Firms and Plants in U.S. Manufacturing’ Review of Industrial Organization 9(1): 41–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch D. B., 1995, Innovation and Industry Evolution Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Benink H. A., Llewellyn D. T., 1994, ‹Fragile Banking in Norway, Sweden and Finland: An Empirical Analysis’ Journal of International Financial Markets. Institutions and Money 4(3–4): 5–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger A. N., Udell G. F., 1998, ‹The Economics of Small Business Finance: The Roles of Private Equity and Debt Markets in the Financial Growth Cycle’ Journal of Banking & Finance 22(6–8): 613–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer M., Hendrix B., 1998, ‹Two Worlds of Venture Capital: What Happened to US and Dutch Early Stage Investment?’ Small Business Economics 10(4): 333–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruyat C., Julien P. A., 2001, ‹Defining the Field of Entrepreneurship’ Journal of Business Venturing 16(2): 165–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkart M., Ellingsen T., 2004, ‹In-Kind Finance: A Theory of Trade Credit’ American Economic Review 94(3): 569–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey M., Post M., Sharpe S. A., 1998, ‹Does Corporate Lending by Banks and Finance Companies Differ? Evidence on Specialization in Private Debt Contracting’ Journal of Finance 53(3): 845–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chemmanur T. J., Fulghieri P., 1994, ‹Reputation, Renegotiation and the Choice between Bank Loans and Publicly Traded Debt’ Review of Financial Studies 7(3): 475–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook L. D., 1999, ‹Trade Credit and Bank Finance: Financing Small Firms in Russia’ Journal of Business Venturing 18(6): 689–708

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunat, V., 2002, ‹Trade Credit: Suppliers as Debt Collectors and Insurance Providers’, working paper, Universitat Pompeu Fabra

  • Davila A., Foster G., Gupta M., 2003, ‹Venture Capital Financing and the Growth of Startup Firms’ Journal of Business Venturing 18(6): 689–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deloof M., Jegers M., 1996, ‹Trade Credit, Product Quality, and Intragroup Trade: Some European Evidence’ Financial Management 25(3): 33–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz H., Lehn K., 1985, ‹The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences’ Journal of Political Economy 93(6): 1155–1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donckels, R., 1993, KMO’s ten Voeten uit. Van Onderzoek tot Actie, Roularta Books

  • Doi N., 1999, ‹The Determinants of Firm Exit in Japanese Manufacturing Industries’ Small Business Economics 13(4): 331–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dun and Bradstreet, 1994, The Failure Record, Annual Publication

  • Evans, J. D., 1998, ‹Are Lending Relationships Valuable to Equity Holders in Chapter 11 Bankruptcy?’, Ph.D. Dissertation. Georgia State University

  • Fisman R., Love I., 2003, ‹Trade Credit, Financial Intermediary Development, and Industry Growth’ Journal of Finance 58(1): 353–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franks J. R., Nyborg K., 1996, ‹Control Rights, Debt Structure, and the Loss of Private Benefits: The Case of the UK Insolvency Code’ Review of Financial Studies 9(4): 1165–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franks J., Sussman O., 2005, ‹Financial Distress and Bank Restructuring of Small to Medium Size U.K. Companies’ Review of Finance 9(1): 65–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman J., Godwin M., 1992, ‹Legal Form, Tax and the Micro Business’, in: Caley K., Chell E., Chittenden F., Mason C. (eds), Small Enterprise Development: Policy and Practice in Action, London: Paul Chapman Publishing, pp. 105–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton B. H., 2000, ‹Does Entrepreneurship Pay? An Empirical Analysis of the Returns to Self-Employment’ Journal of Political Economy 108(3): 604–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harhoff D., Stahl K., Woywode M., 1998, ‹Legal Form, Growth and Exit of West German Firms – Empirical Results for Manufacturing, Construction, Trade and Service Industries’ Journal of Industrial Economics 46(4): 453–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart O., 1995, Firm Contracts and Financial Structure, Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston J., James C., 1996, ‹Bank Information Monopolies and the Mix of Private and Public Debt Claims’ Journal of Finance 51(5): 1863–1889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huyghebaert, N., 2000, The Capital Structure of Business Start-ups, Ph.D. Dissertation. K.U. Leuven

  • Huyghebaert N., Gaeremynck A., Roodhooft F., Van de Gucht L. M., 2000, ‹New Firm Survival: The Effects of Start-up Characteristics’ Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 27(5–6): 627–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huyghebaert, N. and L. M. Van de Gucht, 2005, ‹The Determinants of Financial Structure: New Insights from Business Start-ups’, European Financial Management, forthcoming

  • Huyghebaert N., Van de Gucht L. M., 2004, ‹Incumbent Strategic Behavior in Financial Markets and the Exit of Entrepreneurial Start-ups’ Strategic Management Journal 25(7): 669–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson S., 1998, ‹The Effect of Bank Debt on Optimal Capital Structure’ Financial Management 27(1): 47–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katzner D. W., 1992, ‹The Structure of Authority in the Firm’ Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 19(1): 41–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laitinen E. K., 1994, ‹Prediction of Failure of a Newly Founded Firm’ Journal of Business Venturing 7(4): 323–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manigart S., De Waele K., Wright M., Robbie K., Desbrières P., Sapienza H. J., Beekman A., 2000, ‹Venture Capitalists, Investment Appraisal and Accounting Information: A Comparative Study of the US, UK, France, Belgium and Holland’ European Financial Management 6(3): 389–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann R. J., 1997, ‹The Role of Secured Credit in Small Business Lending’ Georgetown Law Journal 86(1): 1–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Manove M., Padilla J., Pagano M., 2001, ‹Collateral versus Project Screening: A Model of Lazy Banks’ The Rand Journal of Economics 32(4): 726–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maruani M., 1996, ‹Industrial Sociology and the Challenge of Employment’ European Journal of Industrial Relations 2(1): 113–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mian S. L., Smith C. W. Jr., 1992, ‹Accounts Receivable Management Policy: Theory and Evidence’ Journal of Finance 47(1): 169–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, E., 2003, ‹Private Benefits of Control, Capital Structure and Company Growth’, working paper, London School of Economics

  • Ng C. K., Smith J. K., Smith R. L., 1999, ‹Evidence on the Determinants of Credit Terms Used in Interfirm Trade’ Journal of Finance 54(3): 1109–1129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD, 2001, Bank Profitability, Financial Statements of Banks 2001, OECD Paris

  • Ooghe H., Manigart S., Fassin Y., 1991, ‹Growth Patterns of the European Venture Capital Industry’ Journal of Business Venturing 6(6): 381–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen M. A., Rajan R. G., 1994, ‹The Benefits of Lending Relationships: Evidence from Small Business Data’ Journal of Finance 49(1): 3–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen M. A., Rajan R. G., 1997, ‹Trade Credit: Theories and Evidence’ Review of Financial Studies 10(3): 661–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid G. C., 2003, ‹Trajectories of Small Business Financial Structure’ Small Business Economics 20(4): 273–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remolona E. M., Wulfekuhler K. C., 1992, ‹Finance Companies, Bank Competition, and Niche Markets’ Federal Reserve Bank of New York Quarterly Review 17(2): 25–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Repullo R., Suarez J., 1998, ‹Monitoring, Liquidation and Security Design’ Review of Financial Studies 11(1): 163–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson K. C., McDougall P. P., 2001, ‹Entry Barriers and New Venture Performance: A Comparison of Universal and Contingency Approaches’ Strategic Management Journal 22(3): 659–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholtens B., 1999, ‹Analytical Issues in External Financing Alternatives for SBEs’ Small Business Economics 12(2): 137–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer F. M., 2001, ‹Assessing Progress in Research on Industrial Evolution and Economic Growth: A Review Article’ Small Business Economics 16(3): 237–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz A., 1997, ‹Priority, Contracts and Priority in Bankruptcy’ Cornell Law Review 82(4): 1396–1419

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith R. A., 2002, ‹Race, Gender and Authority in the Workplace. Theory and Research’ Annual Review of Sociology 28(1): 509–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner J. and R. Sternberg, 2004, ‹Start-up Activities, Individual Characteristics, and the Regional Milieu: Lessons for Entrepreuneurship Support Policies from German Micro Data’, Anals of Regional Science 38(2), 219–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilner B. S., 2000, ‹The Exploitation of Relationships in Financial Distress: The Case of Trade Credit’ Journal of Finance 55(1): 153–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson N., Summers B., 2002, ‹Trade Credit Terms Offered by Small Firms: Survey Evidence and Empirical Analysis’ Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 29(3–4): 317–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nancy Huyghebaert.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11187-007-9068-8

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huyghebaert, N., Van de Gucht, L. & Van Hulle, C. The Choice between Bank Debt and Trace Credit in Business Start-ups. Small Bus Econ 29, 435–452 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-9005-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-9005-2

Keywords

JEL CLASSIFICATIONS:

Navigation