Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Effects of Different Kinds of Hands-on Modeling Activities on the Academic Achievement, Problem-Solving Skills, and Scientific Creativity of Prospective Science Teachers

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the current study is to investigate the effectiveness of unstructured, semi-structured, structured hands-on modeling activities and traditional teaching methods in developing academic achievement, problem-solving skills, and scientific creativity in prospective science teachers in the subject of the human circulatory and respiratory systems. A pre-test–post-test quasi-experimental design was used to investigate the treatment effect. There were three experimental groups and a control group in a total of 88 prospective science teachers who were enrolled in the Department of Science Education. The Academic Achievement Test (AAT), Problem-Solving Inventory (PSI), and Scientific Creativity Scale (SCS) were applied as data collection tools. The researchers employed two-way ANOVA and ANCOVA to analyze the data. Results revealed that all modeling activities were effective in enhancing participants’ AAT scores when compared with those of the control group. In addition, unstructured modeling and semi-structured modeling activities were more effective than structured modeling activities in improving AAT scores. For the AAT retention test, unstructured and semi-structured modeling groups showed better performance than the structured modeling group and control group. Moreover, there was a statistically significant difference in PSI scores of the participants in favor of unstructured and semi-structured modeling activities. Lastly, there was no statistically significant difference in SCS scores with the experimental groups and control group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akben, N. (2018). Effects of the problem-posing approach on students’ problem solving skills and metacognitive awareness in science education. Research in Science Education, 1–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9726-7.

  • Alkhawaldeh, S. A. (2007). Facilitating conceptual change in ninth grade students’ understanding of human circulatory system concepts. Research in Science & Technological Education, 25(3), 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140701535331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arslan, A. (2013a). The effects of modeling based science and technology teaching on understanding, memorization, creativity and mental models of primary school students. Master Thesis, Akdeniz University.

  • Arslan, A. (2013b). The examination of pre-service teachers' science process skills and conceptual change in inquiry and model based inquiry environment. Master Thesis, Marmara University.

  • Bamberger, Y. M., & Davis, E. A. (2013). Middle-school science students’ scientific modelling performances across content areas and within a learning progression. International Journal of Science Education, 35(2), 213–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.624133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R. (2014). NGSS and the next generation of science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25, 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9381-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, T., Oh, P., Maughn, M., Kiriazis, N., & Zuwallack, R. (2015). A review of modeling pedagogies. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(1), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1314a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H. (2005). Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: why some misconceptions are robust. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 161–199. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1402_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H., Chiu, M. H., & deLeeuw, N. (1991). Learning in a non-physical science domain: the human circulatory system. Pittsburgh: Learning Research and Development Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis fort the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coll, R., & Lajium, D. (2011). Modeling and the future of science learning. In M. Khine & I. Saleh (Eds.), Models and modeling (pp. 3–21). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0449-7_1.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Collin, A., & Ferguson, W. (1993). Epistemic forms and epistemic games: structures and strategies for guiding inquiry. Educational Psychologist, 28(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2801_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirhan, E., & Şahin, F. (2015). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarına yönelik iki aşamalı başarı testi geliştirilmesi: İnsanda dolaşım ve solunum [Developing a two-tier achievement test for prospective science teachers: The human circulation and respiration]. ERPA International Congresses on Education, 4-7 June 2015, Athens.

  • Deniş Çeliker, H., & Balım, A. G. (2012). Adaptation of scientific creativity test to Turkish and ıt’s assessment criteria. Usak University Journal of Social Sciences, 5(2), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devetak, I., Hajzeri, M., Glažar, A. S., & Vogrinec, J. (2010). The influence of different models on 15-years old students’ understanding of the solid state of matter. Acta Chimica Slovenica, 57, 904–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2005). How to design and evaluate research in education. (6th ed). New York: McGraw-Hill International Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, J. R., White, B. Y., & Gutwill, J. (1999). Dynamic mental models in learning science: the importance of constructing derivational linkages among models. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(7), 806–836. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giuliodori, M. J., Lujan, H. L., Briggs, W. S., & DiCarlo, S. E. (2009). A model of locomotor-respiratory coupling in quadrupeds. Advances in Physiology Education, 33(4), 315–318. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00057.2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gobert, J. D., & Pallant, A. (2004). Fostering students’ epistemologies of models via authentic model-based tasks. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(1), 7–22. 1059. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOST.0000019635.70068.6f.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouvea, J., & Passmore, C. (2017). ‘Models of’ versus ‘models for’. Science & Education, 26, 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-017-9884-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Güneş, M. H., & Çelikler, D. (2010). The investigation of effects of modelling and computer assisted instruction on academic achievement. The International Journal of Educational Researchers, 2(3), 22–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halloun, I. A. (2006). Modeling theory in science education (Vol. 24). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heppner, P. P., & Petersen, C. H. (1982). The development and implications of a personal problem solving inventory. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 29, 66–75 http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-0167.29.1.66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstein, A., Shore, R., & Kipnis, M. (2004). Providing high school chemistry students with opportunities to develop learning skills in an inquiry-type laboratory: a case study. International Journal of Science Education, 26(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000070342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, W., & Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 389–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110098912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justi, R., & Van Driel, J. (2005). The development of science teachers’ knowledge on models and modelling: promoting, characterizing, and understanding the process. International Journal of Science Education, 27(5), 549–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000323773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kern, B. B. (2002). Enhancing accounting students' problem-solving skills: the use of a hands-on conceptual model in an active learning environment. Accounting Education, 11(3), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639280210141680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, S. (2011). What’s missing in model-based teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(6), 535–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9248-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KMK [Sekretariat der Ständigen Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder in der BRD] (Ed.). (2005). Bildungsstandards im Fach Biologie für den Mittleren Schulabschluss [Biology education standards for the Mittlere Schulabschluss]. München & Neuwied: Wolters Kluwer.

  • Koponen, I. T. (2007). Models and modelling in physics education: a critical re-analysis of philosophical underpinnings and suggestions for revisions. Science & Education, 16(7–8), 751–773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9000-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krell, M., zu Belzen, A. U., & Krüger, D. (2014). Students’ levels of understanding models and modelling in biology: global or aspect-dependent? Research in Science Education, 44(1), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9365-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krell, M., Reinisch, B., & Krüger, D. (2015). Analyzing students’ understanding of models and modeling referring to the disciplines biology, chemistry, and physics. Research in Science Education, 45(3), 367–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9427-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarowitz, R., & Naim, R. (2013). Learning the cell structures with three- dimensional models: students’ achievement by methods, type of school and questions’ cognitive level. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(4), 500–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9409-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., & Cho, Y. (2007). Factors affecting problem finding depending on degree of structure of problem situation. The Journal of Educational Research, 101(2), 113–123. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.101.2.113-125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, J. C. (2002). Exploring scientific creativity of eleventh grade students in Taiwan. Unpublished PhD Thesis, The University of Texas at Austin.

  • Maia, P. F., & Justi, R. (2009). Learning of chemical equilibrium through modelling-based teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 31(5), 603–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802538045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meador, K. S. (2003). Thinking creatively about science suggestions for primary teachers. Gifted Child Today, 26(1), 25–29. https://doi.org/10.4219/gct-2003-93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MEB [Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı] (2013). Ministry of Education-Elementary education science curriculum (3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 grade) [İlköğretim kurumları fen bilimleri dersi (3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) öğretim programı]. Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı, Ankara.

  • Meinhard, R. (1992). Concept process-based science in the elementary school. Salem: Oregon Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC). (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington DC: The National Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Teachers Association (NSTA). (2012). NSTA Recommendations on NGSS May 11 Public Draft. Retrieved from NSTA’s website http:// www.nsta.org/about/standardsupdate/ recommendations2.aspx.

  • Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). (2013). Next generation science standards for states, by states. http://www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards.

  • Oh, P. S., & Oh, S. J. (2011). What teachers of science need to know about models: an overview. International Journal of Science Education, 33(8), 1109–1130. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.502191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotbain, Y., Marbach-Ad, G., & Stavy, R. (2006). Effect of bead and illustrations models on high school students’ achievement in molecular genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 500–529. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadi, Ö. (2010). Relation of cognitive and motivational variables with students’ human circulatory system achievement in traditional and learning cycle classrooms Unpublished Ph.D thesis, Middle East Technical University.

  • Sandmann, A., & Haugwitz, M. (2010). Collaborative modelling of the vascular system – designing and evaluating a new learning method for secondary students. Journal of Biological Education, 44(3), 136–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2010.9656210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savaşır, I., & Şahin, N. H. (1997). Bilişsel-davranışçı terapilerde değerlendirme: sık kullanılan ölçekler. Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları. No:9. Ankara: Özyurt Matbaacılık.

  • Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Achér, A., Fortus, D., Shwartz, Y., Hug, B., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 632–654. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, M. C., & Nieswandt, M. (2009). Creative activities and their influence on identification in science: three case studies. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(3), 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. M. (1999). A model circulatory system for use in undergraduate physiology laboratories. Advance in Physiology Education, 22(1), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1152/advances.1999.277.6.S92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105284955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2007). Teaching for successful intelligence: to increase student learning and achievement. Corwin Press.

  • Stoyanova, E., & Ellerton, N. F. (1996). A framework for research into student problem posing in school mathematics. In P. C. Clarkson (Ed.), Technology in mathematics education (pp. 518–525). Melbourne: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treagust, D. F., & Tsui, D. (2013). Multiple representations in biological education. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Turk, C., & Kalkan, H. (2017). The effect of teaching astronomy with models on students’ achievements and attitudes. Journal of Current Researches on Educational Studies, 7(2), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.26579/jocures-7.2.12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upmeier zu Belzen, A. (2013). Modelle [Models]. In H. Großengießer, U. Harms, & U. Kattmann (Eds.), Fachdidaktik Biologie [Biology education] (pp. 325–334). Freising: Aulis Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 45-69.https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90018-3.

  • Werner, S., Förtsch, C., Boone, W., von Kotzebue, L., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2019). Investigating how German biology teachers use three-dimensional physical models in classroom instruction: a video study. Research in Science Education, 49(2), 437–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9624-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windschitl, M., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2016). Rigor and equity by design: seeking a core of practices for the science education community. In D. Gitomer & C. Bell (Eds.), AERA handbook of research on teaching (5th ed., pp. 1099–1158). Washington, DC: AERA Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wüsten, S. (2010). Allgemeine und fachspezifische Merkmale der Unterrichtsqualität im Fach Biologie: Eine video- und Interventionsstudie [General and content-specific features of instructional quality in the subject biology: a video and intervention study]. Berlin: Logos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarker, M. B. (2013). Teacher challenges, perceptions, and use of science models in middle school classrooms about climate, weather, and energy concepts. Ph.D thesis, The University of Iowa.

  • Zion, M. I., & Sadeh, I. (2007). Curiosity and open inquiry learning. Journal of Biological Education, 41(4), 162–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2007.9656092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the participants who enrolled in this study.

Funding

The study was supported by TUBITAK (The Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey) 2211-Doctoral Scholarship with first author’s thesis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, Department of Special Education, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey

    Eda Demirhan

  2. Faculty of Atatürk Education, Mathematics and Science Education Department, Marmara University, İstanbul, Turkey

    Fatma Şahin

Authors
  1. Eda Demirhan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fatma Şahin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eda Demirhan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1. The sample questions of AAT, PSI, and SCS

Appendix 1. The sample questions of AAT, PSI, and SCS

figure a

Appendix 2

Fig. 2
figure 2

Procedures of the hands-on modeling activities in the model of vein

Full size image

Appendix 3

Fig. 3
figure 3

Photos of the vein that produced by Exp 1 and Exp 2. a Exp 1 (unstructured hands-on models). b Exp 2 (semi-structured hands-on models)

Full size image

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Demirhan, E., Şahin, F. The Effects of Different Kinds of Hands-on Modeling Activities on the Academic Achievement, Problem-Solving Skills, and Scientific Creativity of Prospective Science Teachers. Res Sci Educ 51 (Suppl 2), 1015–1033 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09874-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09874-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation