Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

At the Crossroads: The Impact of New Irish Science Curricula on First Year Post-Primary Students

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Ireland, new science curricula were introduced at primary and early post-primary levels in 2003, in an effort to reverse declining interest and enrolment in science. This paper reports on a national study that explored first year post-primary students’ experiences of and attitudes towards school science under these new curricula. Data were gathered from 366 pupils using survey and case study approaches. Findings revealed broadly positive attitudes towards post-primary school science, especially the experimental work that is at the heart of the new curriculum. However, it would appear that students were not conducting open-ended investigations or using information and communications technology [ICT] to any great extent; moreover, there was some evidence of traditional teaching methods being utilised. Pupils were highly critical of previous primary school science experiences, reporting a lack of ‘hands-on’ activities, didactic methodologies and, for a significant minority, a paucity of any memorable primary science at all. Improvements in curricular implementation are proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The letters T, U, V, W, X, Y and Z represent the seven case study schools where interviews were conducted.

References

  • BECTA (2003). Secondary schools—ICT and standards: An analysis of national data from Ofsted and QCA. Retrieved June 16, 2008 from http://partners.becta.org.uk/upload-dir/downloads/page_documents/research/secschoolfull.pdf.

  • Braund, M., & Driver, M. (2005). Pupils’ perceptions of practical science in primary and secondary school: implications for improving progression and continuity of learning. Educational Research, 47(1), 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braund, M., & Hames, V. (2005). Improving progression and continuity from primary to secondary science: pupils’ reactions to bridging work. International Journal of Science Education, 27(7), 781–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braund, M., Crompton, Z., Driver, M., & Parvin, J. (2003). Bridging the key stage 2/3 gap in science. School Science Review, 85(310), 117–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, S., Reiss, M., & Stobart, G. (2008). The effects of national testing on science at KS2 in England and Wales: Executive summary. In Wellcome Trust website. Retrieved May 19, 2008 from www.wellcome.ac.uk/stellent/groups/corporatesite/@msh_peda/documents/web_document/wtd039972.pdf.

  • Cosgrove, J., Shiel, G., Sofroniou, N., Zastrutzki, S., & Shortt, F. (2005). Education for life. The achievements of 15-year-olds in Ireland in the second cycle of PISA. Dublin: Educational Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, C. (2000). Upper primary boys’ and girls’ interests in science: have they changed since 1980? International Journal of Science Education, 22(6), 557–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education. (1971). Curaclam na bunscoile–primary school curriculum–teachers’ handbooks (2 volumes). Dublin: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education. (1989). The junior certificate: Science guidelines for teachers. Dublin: National Council for Curriculum and Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Science. (1999a). Primary school curriculum: Science. Dublin: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Science. (1999b). Primary school curriculum: Science—teacher guidelines. Dublin: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Science. (1999c). Primary school curriculum: Introduction. Dublin: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Science (2001a). Junior certificate examination 2001: Science-ordinary level. Retrieved May 30, 2011 from http://www.examinations.ie/archive/exampapers/2001/JC045GLPIEV.pdf.

  • Department of Education and Science (2001b). Junior certificate examination 2001: Science-higher level. Retrieved May 30, 2011 from http://www.examinations.ie/archive/exampapers/2001/JC045ALPIEV.pdf.

  • Department of Education and Science. (2003a). Junior certificate science syllabus (Ordinary level and higher level). Dublin: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Science. (2003b). Junior certificate science syllabus. Notes on the revised syllabus. Dublin: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Science. (2006). Science: Junior Certificate draft guidelines for teachers. Dublin: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Science (n.d.). All open post-primary schools in Ireland: Enrolment for school year 2006/7. Retrieved June 30, 2008 from http://www.education.ie/servlet/blobservlet/ppschools_epl.xls

  • Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Children’s ideas in science. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eivers, E., Shiel, G., & Cheevers, C. (2006). Implementing the revised junior certificate science syllabus: What teachers said. Dublin: Department of Education and Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eivers, E., Shiel, G., & Cunningham, R. (2007). Ready for tomorrow’s world? The competencies of Ireland’s 15-year-olds in PISA 2006. Summary report. Dublin: Department of Education and Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, S. (2010, December 7). Ireland drops in literacy rankings. The Irish Times. Retrieved from http://www.irishtimes.com.

  • Francis, L., & Greer, J. (1999). Attitude toward science among post-primary school pupils in Northern Ireland: relationship with sex, age and religion. Research in Science and Technological Education, 17(1), 67–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galton, M. (2002). Continuity and progression in science teaching at key stages 2 and 3. Cambridge Journal of Education, 32(2), 249–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackling, M., Peers, S., & Prain, V. (2007). Primary connections: reforming science teaching in Australian primary schools. Teaching Science, 53(3), 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarman, R. (1995). Science is a green-field site: a study of primary science/ secondary science continuity in Northern Ireland. Educational Research, 37(2), 141–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarman, R. (1997). Fine in theory: a study of primary-secondary continuity in science, prior and subsequent to the introduction of the Northern Ireland curriculum. Educational Research, 39(3), 291–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, T., & Pell, A. (2002). Changes in boys’ and girls’ attitudes to school and science during a two-year science in-service programme. Curriculum Journal, 13(1), 43–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junior Science Support Service (2009). Junior Science Support Service- homepage. Retrieved June 1, 2011 from http://www.juniorscience.ie/jsss/main/Home.htm.

  • Kind, P., Jones, K., & Barmby, P. (2007). Developing attitudes towards science measures. International Journal of Science Education, 29(7), 871–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, P., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, P. (1993). The handbook of psychological testing. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krogh, L., & Thomsen, P. (2005). Studying students’ attitudes towards science from a cultural perspective but with a quantitative methodology: border crossing into the physics classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 27(3), 281–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, M., & Skamp, K. (2008). Engaging students in science across the primary/ secondary interface: listening to the students’ voice. Research in Science Education, 38(4), 501–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, P. (2007). The relevance of science education in Ireland. Dublin: Royal Irish Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W. (Ed.). (1998). The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies. London: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaboe, J., & Condon, N. (2007). Monitoring Ireland’s skills supply: Trends in education/ training outputs. Dublin: Foras Áiseanna Saothair-Training and Employment Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minner, D., Levy, A., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction-what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrell, P., & Lederman, N. (1998). Students’ attitudes towards school and classroom science: are they independent phenomena? School Science and Mathematics, 98(2), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, C., & Beggs, J. (2002). Ten years of National Curriculum primary science in Northern Ireland: a study of children’s attitudes. Irish Educational Studies, 21(2), 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, C., Murphy, C., & Kilfeather, P. (2011a). Children making sense of science. Research in Science Education, 41(2), 283–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, C., Varley, J., & Veale, Ó. (2011b). I’d rather they did experiments with us…than just talking: Irish children’s views of primary school science. Research in Science Education. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s11165-010-9204-3.

  • Murray, I., & Reiss, M. (2005). The student review of the science curriculum. School Science Review, 87(318), 83–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J., & Gowin, D. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M. (2004). Making the move: Students’, teachers’ and parents’ perspectives of transfer from first to second-level schooling. Dublin: Marino Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, R., Moran, G., Cosgrove, J., & Shiel, G. (2010). PISA 2009: The performance and progress of 15-year-olds in Ireland. Summary report. Dublin: Educational Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, N. (2003). Gender and physics. International Journal of Science Education, 25(4), 509–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robson, C. (2002). Real world research (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roccard, M., Csermely, P., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D., Walberg-Henriksson, H., & Hemmo, V. (2007). Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Smyth, E., & Hannan, C. (2002). Who chooses science? Subject choice in second-level schools. Dublin: Liffey Press/ ESRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, E., & Hannan, C. (2006). School effects and subject choice: the uptake of scientific subjects in Ireland. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(3), 303–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, E., McCoy, S., & Darmody, M. (2004). Moving up: The experiences of first-year students in post-primary education. Dublin: Liffey Press/ ESRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, R., & Gray, D. (1999). Gender preferences in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(6), 633–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Supovitz, J., & Turner, H. (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 963–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tai, R., Liu, C., Maltese, A., & Fan, X. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312, 1143–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Task Force on the Physical Sciences. (2002). Report and recommendations of the task force on the physical sciences. Dublin: Department of Education and Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, C., & Woodward, N. (1998). Girls and science: does a core curriculum in primary school give cause for optimism? Gender and Education, 10(4), 387–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Grateful thanks are extended to all participants, especially the students. This work was funded by the National Council for Curriculum and Assessment (NCCA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for the Advancement of Science and Mathematics Teaching and Learning (CASTeL), St. Patrick’s College, Drumcondra, Dublin 9, Ireland

    Janet Penelope Varley & Clíona Murphy

  2. Education Department, St. Patrick’s College, Drumcondra, Dublin 9, Ireland

    Órlaith Veale

  3. Biology Department, St. Patrick’s College, Drumcondra, Dublin 9, Ireland

    Janet Penelope Varley

Authors
  1. Janet Penelope Varley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Clíona Murphy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Órlaith Veale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janet Penelope Varley.

Additional information

* Indicates reference cited as secondary source.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Varley, J.P., Murphy, C. & Veale, Ó. At the Crossroads: The Impact of New Irish Science Curricula on First Year Post-Primary Students. Res Sci Educ 43, 275–298 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9252-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9252-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation