Abstract
In this study, the effects of academic inbreeding on individual and institutional research productivity are examined to understand its impact as a recruitment policy. Over the past decade, in particular, there has been growing awareness of the problems posed by inbreeding in higher education. This study aims to expand on this awareness through an analysis of the prevalence of academic kinship in the Turkish higher education system, as well as the effects of inbreeding on the research productivity of academics and on their total research output. Unlike previous studies, the present study tests three distinct descriptions of inbreeding. The analyses in the study are performed on (1) the data records of 88,162 doctorate-holding faculty members’ nationally published articles and internationally published articles publications (Web of Science) from 203 Turkish universities; (2) their international citations; and (3) the projects they managed during the 2020–2021 academic year. Random effects estimator analyses were used the with multivariate negative binomial logit hurdle to account for institutional and individual differences. The findings indicate a high level of academic inbreeding in Turkish higher education. More specifically, the level was found to be 41%, which is one of the highest rates reported in the literature. Moreover, the findings suggest a negative impact of academic inbreeding on individual and institutional research productivity. In this respect, regardless of the field of study, inbred academics have lower number of national and internationally published articles, citations, and project management experiences than non-inbred researchers. In addition, it was found that the rate of academic inbreeding has a significant effect on universities’ research productivity. Given these results, it can be stated that academic inbreeding has a detrimental effect on higher education.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
As datum, the total number of articles in which each academic participated as an author was taken as the basis.
As datum, the number of projects in which each academic participated as a project coordinator was taken as the basis.
References
Alipova, O., & Lovakov, A. (2018). Academic inbreeding and publication activities of Russian faculty. Tertiary Education and Management, 24(1), 66–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2017.1395905
Altbach, P., Yudkevich, M., & Rumbley, L. (2015). Academic inbreeding: local challenge, global problem (pp. 1–17). Palgrave Macmillan.
Berelson, B. (1960). Graduate education in the United States. McGraw-Hill.
Bleiklie, I., & Høtaker, R. (2004). Modernizing research training-education and science policy between profession, discipline and academic institution. Higher Education Policy, 17(2), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300052
Burris, V. (2004). The academic caste system: Prestige hierarchies in PhD exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 69(2), 239–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240406900205
Camerer, C., & Vepsalainen, A. (1988). The economic efficiency of corporate culture. Strategic Management Journal, 9(1S), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250090712
Carvalho, T. (2012). Shaping the ‘new’ academic profession. Tensions...—Google Akademik. In N. G & A. Amaral (Eds.), Higher education in Portugal 1974–2009: A nation, a generation (pp. 329–352). Springer.
Cruz-Castro, L., & Sanz-Menéndez, L. (2010). Mobility versus job stability: Assessing tenure and productivity outcomes. Research Policy, 39(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.11.008
de Filippo, D., Casado, E. S., & Gómez, I. (2009). Quantitative and qualitative approaches to the study of mobility and scientific performance: A case study of a Spanish university. Research Evaluation, 18(3), 191–200. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820209X451032
Doğramacı, İ. (2007). Türkiye’de ve dünyada yükseköğretim yönetimi. Meteksan.
Eells, W. C., & Cleveland, A. C. (1935). Faculty inbreeding. The Journal of Higher Education, 6(5), 261. https://doi.org/10.2307/1975545
Eisenberg, T., & Wells, M. T. (2000). Inbreeding in law school hiring: Assessing the performance of faculty hired from within. Journal of Legal Studies, 29(1 PART II), 369. https://doi.org/10.1086/468077
Fangmeng, T. (2016). Brain circulation, diaspora and scientific progress: A study of the international migration of Chinese scientists, 1998–2006. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 25(3), 296–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/0117196816656637
Futuyma, D. J. (2017). Evolutionary biology today and the call for an extended synthesis. Interface Focus. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2016.0145
Godechot, O., & Louvet, A. (2008). Academic inbreeding: An evaluation. https://booksandideas.net/Academic-Inbreeding-An-Evaluation.html
Gokturk, D., & Yildirim-Tasti, O. (2020). The role of academic ınbreeding in building ınstitutional and research habitus: A case study from Turkey. Higher Education Policy. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-020-00201-1
Gorelova, O., & Yudkevich, M. (2015). Academic inbreeding: state of the literature (pp. 130–155). Palgrave Macmillan.
Greene, W. (2005). Fixed and random effects in stochastic frontier models. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 23(1), 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-004-8545-1
Hargens, L. L., & Farr, G. M. (1973). An examination of recent hypotheses about institutional inbreeding. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1381–1402. https://doi.org/10.1086/225470
Heitor, M., Horta, H., & Mendonça, J. (2014). Developing human capital and research capacity: Science policies promoting brain gain. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82(1), 6–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.07.008
Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1984). Hofstede’s culture dimensions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 15(4), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002184015004003
Hollingshead, A. B. (1938). Ingroup membership and academic selection. American Sociological Review, 3(6), 826. https://doi.org/10.2307/2084715
Horta, H. (2013). Deepening our understanding of academic inbreeding effects on research information exchange and scientific output: New insights for academic based research. Higher Education, 65(4), 487–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9559-7
Horta, H., & Yudkevich, M. (2016). The role of academic inbreeding in developing higher education systems: Challenges and possible solutions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 113, 363–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.06.039
Horta, H., Cattaneo, M., & Meoli, M. (2018). PhD funding as a determinant of PhD and career research performance. Studies in Higher Education, 43(3), 542–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1185406
Horta, H., Meoli, M., & Santos, J. M. (2021). Academic inbreeding and choice of strategic research approaches. Higher Education Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12328
Horta, H., Sato, M., & Yonezawa, A. (2011). Academic inbreeding: Exploring its characteristics and rationale in Japanese universities using a qualitative perspective. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-010-9126-9
Horta, H., Veloso, F. M., & Grediaga, Ŕ. (2010). Navel gazing: Academic inbreeding and scientific productivity. Management Science, 56(3), 414–429. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1109
Inanc, O., & Tuncer, O. (2011). The effect of academic inbreeding on scientific effectiveness. Scientometrics, 88(3), 885–898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0415-9
Jones, G. A., & Jefferson, A. E. (2021). Reconceptualizing the phenomenon of inbreeding: Labour markets, stratification, and capital. Higher Education Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12329
Karadag, E. (2021). Academic (dis)qualifications of Turkish rectors: Their career paths H-index and the number of articles and citations. Higher Education, 81(2), 301–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00542-1
Katranidis, S., Panagiotidis, T., & Zontanos, C. (2017). Economists, research performance and national ınbreeding: North Versus South. Economic Notes, 46(1), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecno.12065
Knetter, M. M., & Prusa, T. J. (2003). Macroeconomic factors and antidumping filings: Evidence from four countries. Journal of International Economics, 61(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(02)00080-6
March, J. G. (2005). Parochialism in the evolution of a research community: The case of organization studies. Management and Organization Review, 1(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2004.00002.x
McGee, R. (1960). The function of ınstitutional ınbreeding. American Journal of Sociology, 65(5), 483–488. https://doi.org/10.1086/222753
McNeely, J. (1932). Faculty inbreeding in land-grant Colleges and Universities. Office of Education.
Padilla, L. E. (2008). How has Mexican faculty been trained? A national perspective and a case study. Higher Education, 56(2), 167–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9096-y
Pelz, D. C., & Andrews, F. M. (1996). Scientists in organizations: Productive climates for research and development. Wiley.
Pelz, D., & Andrews, F. (1966). Scientists in organizations. Wiley.
Reeves, F., Henry, N., Kelly, F., Klein, A., & Russell, J. (1933). The university faculty. The University of Chicago.
Shibayama, S. (2021). Development of originality under inbreeding: A case of life science labs in Japan. Higher Education Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12315
Shin, J. C., Jung, J., & Lee, S. J. (2016). Academic inbreeding of Korean professors: Academic training, networks, and their performance (pp. 187–206). Springer.
Sivak, E., & Yudkevich, M. (2015). Academic immobility and inbreeding in Russian universities (pp. 130–155). Palgrave Macmillan.
Smeby, J. C., & Try, S. (2005). Departmental contexts and faculty research activity in Norway. Research in Higher Education, 46(6), 593–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-4136-2
Smolentseva, A. (2003). Challenges to the Russian academic profession. Higher Education, 45(4), 391–424. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023954415569
Smyth, R., & Mishra, V. (2014). Academic inbreeding and research productivity and impact in Australian law schools. Scientometrics, 98(1), 583–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1052-2
Soler, M. (2001). How inbreeding affects productivity in europe. In Nature (Vol. 411, Issue 6834, p. 132). Macmillan Magazines Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1038/35075637
Sologoup, I., & Coupe, T. (2015). Academic inbreeding in Ukraine (pp. 228–258). Palgrave Macmillan.
Tavares, O., Cardoso, S., Carvalho, T., Sousa, S. B., & Santiago, R. (2015). Academic inbreeding in the Portuguese academia. Higher Education, 69(6), 991–1006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9818-x
Tavares, O., Lancą, V., & Amaral, A. (2017). Academic inbreeding in Portugal: Does ınsularity play a role? Higher Education Policy, 30(3), 381–399. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-016-0029-1
Tavares, O., Sin, C., & Lança, V. (2019). Inbreeding and research productivity among sociology PhD holders in Portugal. Minerva, 57(3), 373–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-019-09378-1
Tavares, O., Sin, C., Sá, C., Bugla, S., & Amaral, A. (2021). Inbreeding and research collaborations in Portuguese higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, hequ.12301. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12301
Tizhoosh, H., & Hemmesi, R. (2018). Academic Inbreeding at the Canadian Engineering Schools. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/jrk67
Velho, L., & Krige, J. (1984). Publication and citation practices of brazilian agricultural scientists. Social Studies of Science, 14(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631284014001004
Wyer, J. C., & Conrad, C. F. (1984). Institutional origin: Labor market signaling in higher education. The Review of Higher Education, 7(2), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.1984.0019
YÖK. (2007). Türkiye’nin yükseköğretim stratejisi. Yükseköğretim Kurulu.
YÖK. (2020). Yükseköğretim bilgi yönetim sistemi. https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Karadag, E., Ciftci, S.K. Deepening the Effects of the Academic Inbreeding: Its Impact on Individual and Institutional Research Productivity. Res High Educ 63, 1015–1036 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-021-09670-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-021-09670-8