Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multicultural And International Education: Never The Twain Shall Meet?

  • Published:
International Review of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper commences with an attempt to define multicultural education (also referred to as intercultural education) with reference to its historical development and current uses of the term. The rise of international schools is then addressed as a necessary preamble to a definition of international education from an historical perspective; a comparison with multicultural education sharpens the definition. The author goes on to propose that intercultural understanding is a principal, common objective of multicultural and international education and should serve to bring together scholars and practitioners in both fields whereas the literature and practice shows them, by and large, operating independently with little reference, one to the other. Greater collaboration can only be of mutual benefit in achieving common objectives and improving practice. The paper concludes with some suggestions for collaborative research across both fields.

Résumé

ÉDUCATION MULTICULTURELLE ET ÉDUCATION INTERNATIONALE : POURRONT-ELLES JAMAIS SE RENCONTRER ? – L’article s’ouvre sur une tentative de dÉfinition de l’Éducation multiculturelle (Également dÉsignÉe sous le terme d’Éducation interculturelle) en rapport avec son dÉveloppement historique et les utilisations courantes de ce terme. L’essor des Écoles internationales est alors ÉvoquÉ comme Étant un prÉambule nÉcessaire à une dÉfinition de l’Éducation internationale d’un point de vue historique; une comparaison avec l’Éducation multiculturelle affine cette dÉfinition. L’auteur propose à la suite de cela que la comprÉhension interculturelle soit un objectif principal et commun d’une Éducation multiculturelle et internationale devant servir à rassembler des savants et des praticiens dans les deux domaines, ceci alors que la littÉrature et la pratique les montrent, gÉnÉralement, comme fonctionnant indÉpendamment et comme ayant peu de rapport les uns avec les autres. Une plus grande collaboration ne peut être qu’un avantage dans les deux sens en permettant la rÉalisation d’objectifs communs et en amÉliorant la pratique. L’article conclut sur quelques suggestions pour une recherche associÉe dans les deux domaines.

Zusammenfassung

MULTIKULTURELLE UND INTERNATIONALE BILDUNG: WERDEN DIE ZWEI SICH JE VERBINDEN? – Der Beitrag beginnt mit einer Begriffsklärung multikultureller Bildung (oder auch interkultureller Bildung), unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der historischen Entwicklung und des heutigen Gebrauchs dieses Terminus. Die Zunahme internationaler Schulen wird aus historischer Perspektive als notwendiger Vorlauf zu einer Definition internationaler Bildung betrachtet. Ein Vergleich mit multikultureller Bildung präzisiert die Definition. Der Autor führt aus, dass das interkulturelle Verständnis zu den grundlegend gemeinsamen Zielvorstellungen multikultureller und internationaler Bildung zählt. Dies könnte eigentlich der Zusammenführung von Wissenschaftlern und Praktikern beider Bereiche dienen, jedoch zeigen Literatur und Praxis, dass beide Bereiche zumeist unabhängig voneinander und mit nur sehr wenig Bezug aufeinander operieren. Eine stärkere Zusammenarbeit könnte von größtem gegenseitigen Nutzen zur Verfolgung gemeinsamer Ziele und zum Aufbau gemeinsamer Praxisfelder sein. Am Ende des Beitrags werden Vorschläge für gemeinsame Forschungsvorhaben beider Bereiche gemacht.

Resumen

LA EDUCACIÓN MULTICULTURAL Y LA EDUCACIÓN INTERNACIONAL, ¿NUNCA COINCIDIRÁN? – El trabajo comienza con el intento de definir la educaciÓn multicultural (también llamada educaciÓn intercultural), relacionÁndola con su desarrollo histÓrico y el uso actual que se hace de este término. Luego describe el aumento de escuelas internacionales, a modo de introducciÓn necesaria, para definir la educaciÓn internacional desde una perspectiva histÓrica, y precisa esta definiciÓn haciendo una comparaciÓn con la educaciÓn multicultural. El autor sigue con la propuesta de que la comprensiÓn intercultural es un objetivo principal y común de la educaciÓn multicultural e internacional, y que debería servir para reconciliar a los eruditos y a los profesionales de la prÁctica en ambos campos, siendo que estÁ demostrado que en general, la literatura y la prÁctica operan independientemente, consultÁndose poco y nada unos a otros. Una mayor colaboraciÓn sería un gran beneficio para ambas partes en cuanto al logro de los objetivos comunes y el perfeccionamiento prÁctico. El trabajo termina con algunas sugerencias relacionadas con una investigaciÓn cooperante que abarque ambos campos.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australia. 2006. New South Wales Education Department Multicultural Education Services. http://www.schools.nsw.edu.au/learning/yrk12focusareas/multiculted/index. php Downloaded 14/02/06.

  • Banks, J. 1992. Multicultural Education, History of. In: Encyclopedia of Educational Research, ed. M. Alkin, vol. 3, 870–873. New York: Macmillan.

  • Banks J. (ed.) 1996. Multicultural Education, Transformative Knowledge and Action: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University

    Google Scholar 

  • Batelaan, P. 1994. Intercultural Education for Cultural Development: The Contribution of Teacher Education. In: International Yearbook of Education, Vol. XLIV, 121–132 Development, Culture and Education, Paris: UNESCO.

  • Chapman T., Hobbel N. (2005) Multicultural Education and its Typologies. In S. Farenga, D. Ness (eds) Encyclopedia of Education and Human Development Vol. 1. New York: M.E.Sharpe, pp 296–301

    Google Scholar 

  • CMEF. 2006. Canadian Multicultural Education Foundation. http://www.cmef.ca/. Downloaded 25/02/06.

  • Cvjeticanin B. 2000. The Culturelink Network Project – Redefining Cultural Identities: The Multicultural Contexts of the Central European and Mediterranean Regions. Culturelink 11(31):3–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasen P., P. Furter G. Rist (1994) The Challenges to Education Systems from the Contemporary Cultural Dynamic. In: L. Dubbeldam (ed.) International Yearbook of Education, Vol XLIV: Development, Culture and Education. Paris: UNESCO, pp 105–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens Charles (1864) International Education. In: All The Year Round: A Weekly Journal, XII (281):281–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernalsteen V. (2002) Does Complex Instruction Benefit Intercultural Education? Intercultural Education 13(1):69–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fennes H., Hapgood K. (1997) Intercultural Learning in the Classroom: Crossing Borders. Cassell, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner H. (1999) Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century. New York: Basic Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Goormaghtigh, J. 1989. From the Collegium Lucis to the International Baccalaureate. Peterson Lecture. Geneva: International Baccalaureate Organization, 1–8. http://www.ibo.org/council/peterson/ Downloaded 27/02/06.

  • Hayden, M. 2001. International Education and the IB Programmes. Unpublished paper presented to a meeting of the International Baccalaureate Organization’s Academic Advisory Committee on April 5 (Geneva), 1–9.

  • Heyward M (2002) From International to Intercultural: Redefining the International School for a Globalized World. Journal of Research in International Education 1(1):9–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill Ian. (2000) Internationally-Minded Schools. International Schools Journal XX(1):24–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill Ian. (2001a) Early Stirrings: The Beginnings of the International Education Movement. International Schools Journal XX(2):11–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill Ian. (2001b) The beginnings of the International Education Movement Part II. International Schools Journal XXI(1):35–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Husén, T., and T. N. Postlethwaite. 1994a. International Education. In: The International Encyclopedia of Education, 2nd edn., vol. 7, 2972–2978. Oxford: Pergamon.

  • Husén, T., and T. N. Postlethwaite. 1994b. Multicultural Education. In: The International Encyclopedia of Education 2nd edn., vol. 7, 3960–3970. Oxford: Pergamon.

  • Intercultural Education. 2006. http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/14675986.asp. Downloaded 25/02/06.

  • International Baccalaureate Organization. 2003. Mission Statement. Downloaded from http://www.ibo.org on 02/06/06.

  • James K. (2005) International Education: The Concept, and its Relationship to Intercultural Education. Journal of Research in International Education 4(3):313–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. 1988. The Ethos of International Schools, MSc thesis, University of Oxford.

  • Mitchell B., R. Salisbury (1996) Multicultural Education: An International Guide to Research, Policies, and Programs. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell B., Salisbury R. (1999) The Encyclopedia of Multicultural Education. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group

    Google Scholar 

  • Modgil S., G. Verma, K. Mallick and C. Modgil (eds). 1986. Multicultural Education: The Interminable Debate. London: Falmer Press

  • Mushi Selina. (2004) Multicultural Competencies in Teaching: A Typology of Classroom Activities. Intercultural Education 15(2):179–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NAME (National Association for Multicultural Education). 2006. http://www.nameorg.org/. Downloaded 25/02/06.

  • Piaget Jean. (1957) Introduction to John Amos Comenius, Selections, In Commemoration of the Third Centenary of the Publication of Opera Didactica Omnia 1657–1957. Paris: UNESCO

    Google Scholar 

  • Portera A. (1998) Multiculture, Identity, Educational Need and Possibilities of (Intercultural) Intervention. European Journal of Intercultural Studies 9(2):209–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SIETR (Society for Intercultural Education, Training and Research). 2006. http://www.sietar.org/. Downloaded 27/02/06.

  • Sunarto, K., R. Hiang-Khng Heng., and A. Fedyani Saifuddin. (eds.). 2004. Multicultural Education in Indonesia and Southeast Asia: Stepping into the Unfamiliar. Depok, Indonesia: Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia in collaboration with TIFA Foundation.

  • Sylvester, Robert. 2002. The ‹First’ International School. In: International Education in Practice, ed. by Mary Hayden Jeff Thompson and Georg Walker: 3–17. London: Kogan

  • Troutman P., E. Zehm S. Zehm (1998) The Leadership Role of School Administrators in Intercultural Education. In: European Journal of Intercultural Studies 9(2):165–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. 1974. Recommendation on Education for International Understanding, Cooperation and Peace and Education Relating to Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, In: Records of the General Conference Eighteenth Session volume 1 Resolutions. Paris: UNESCO.

  • Useem R., R. Downie (1976) Third Culture Kids. Today’s Education 65(3):103–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Voltaire, F.-M. 1752. Micromegas. T. Cuff (translator). New edition, London: Penguin, 1995.

  • Walkling P. (1990) Multicultural Education. In: N. Entwistle (ed) Handbook of Educational Ideas and Practices. London: Routledge, pp 82–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson V., Wilkinson D. (2001) Redressing the Imbalance. IB World 26:8–10

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian Hill.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hill, I. Multicultural And International Education: Never The Twain Shall Meet?. Int Rev Educ 53, 245–264 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-007-9048-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-007-9048-x

Keywords

Navigation