Skip to main content
Log in

The application of fluorescence spectroscopy to organic matter characterisation in drinking water treatment

  • Reviews
  • Published:
Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Key to effective disinfection byproduct (DBP) management is source water control and management, and more specifically, organic matter (OM) control and management. However, the content and character of OM in source waters is spatially and temporally variable, and the prediction of its composition is challenging. Water treatment companies require adequate analytical techniques for OM characterisation to maintain the operation of the water supply and treatment systems adjusted to constantly changing environmental conditions. There is a requirement, therefore, for an improved understanding of OM composition and character in source water, how that composition and character varies with flow conditions, and how this impacts on drinking water treatment. This paper demonstrates that fluorescence spectroscopy offers a potential alternative to other analytical methods of OM characterisation. The advantages of fluorescence include rapid, sensitive and selective characterisation of OM, no sample pre-treatment, small sample volume, and the potential for on-line monitoring incorporation. Fluorescence can provide useful information on OM reactivity and treatability together with an indication of the OM sources (allochthonous or autochthonous). The paper discusses a body of literature which has identified relationships between fluorescence spectra and OM physico-chemical properties (i.e. degree of hydrophobicity, microbial content), has applied fluorescence spectroscopy to characterise the changes in OM upon disinfection, and has related the fluorescence properties to DBP formation. Further work is required in the robust management of data arising from fluorescence spectroscopy analysis and, in particular, Excitation Emission Matrices. Consideration must be given as to how the data might best be employed to greatest effect on a routine basis at WTW.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad SR, Reynolds DM (1999) Monitoring of water quality using fluorescence technique: prospect of on-line process control. Water Res 33(9):2069–2074

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Asai R, Horiguchi Y, Yoshida A et al (2001) Detection of phycobilin pigments and their seasonal change in Lake Kasumigaura using a sensitive in situ fluorometric sensor. Anal Lett 34(14):2521–2533

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baghoth SA, Sharma SK, Amy GL (2011) Tracking natural organic matter (NOM) in a drinking water treatment plant using fluorescence excitation-emission matrices and PARAFAC. Water Res 45:797–809

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baker A (2002) Fluorescence excitation-emission matrix characterization of some sewage-impacted rivers. Environ Sci Technol 35(5):948–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker A, Spencer RGM (2004) Characterisation of dissolved organic matter from source to sea using fluorescence and absorbance spectroscopy. Sci Total Environ 333:217–232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beggs K, Zachman BA, Valenti C et al (2006) Predicting disinfection byproducts using molecular fluorescence. In Proceedings of AWWA WQTC Conference, Denver, USA

  • Beutler M, Wiltshire KH, Meyer B et al (2002) A fluorometric method for the differentiation of algal populations in vivo and in situ. J Photosynth Res 72:39–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bieroza M, Baker A, Bridgeman J (2009) Relating freshwater organic matter fluorescence to organic carbon removal efficiency in drinking water treatment. Sci Total Environ 407:1765–1774

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bieroza M, Baker A, Bridgeman J (2010) Assessing organic matter removal efficiency at water treatment works using fluorescence spectroscopy. Drink Water Eng Sci 3:63–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bieroza M, Baker A, Bridgeman J (2011) Assessing organics removal in water treatment with data mining and artificial neural networks, accepted by Advances in engineering software, doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2011.05.031

  • Bro R (1997) PARAFAC tutorial and applications. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 38(2):149–171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman PJ, Clark JM, Reynolds B, Aadamson JK (2008) The influence of organic acids in relation to acid deposition in controlling the acidity of soil and stream waters on a seasonal basis. Environ Pollut 151:110–120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Valentine RL (2007) Formation of N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) from humic substances in natural water. Environ Sci Technol 41:6059–6065

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Westerhoff P, Leenheer JA et al (2003) Fluorescence excitation-emission matrix regional integration to quantify spectra for dissolved organic matter. Environ Sci Technol 37:5701–5710

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coble PG (1996) Characterization of marine and terrestrial DOM in seawater using excitation–emission matrix spectroscopy. Mar Chem 51:325–346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Courtis BJ, West JR, Bridgeman J (2009) Chlorine demand-based predictive modelling of THM formation in water distribution networks. Urban Water J 6(6):407–415

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • del Castillo CE, Coble PG, Morell JM et al (1999) Analysis of the optical properties of the Orinoco River plume by absorption and fluorescence spectroscopy. Mar Chem 66:35–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Denkhaus E, Meisen S, Telgheder U et al (2007) Chemical and physical methods for characterisation of biofilms–review. Mikrochim Acta 158:1–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Determann S, Lobbes JM, Reuter R et al (1998) Ultraviolet fluorescence excitation and emission spectroscopy of marine algae and bacteria. Mar Chem 62(1–2):137–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edzwald JK (1993) Coagulation in drinking-water treatment—particles, organics and coagulants. Water Sci Technol 27:21–35

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Egeberg PK, Alberts JJ (2002) Determination of hydrophobicity of NOM by RP-HPLC, and the effect of pH and ionic strength. Water Res 36:4997–5004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot S, Lead JR, Baker A (2006) Thermal quenching of fluorescence of freshwater, planktonic bacteria. Anal Chim Acta 564:219–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelen S, Frosch S, Jørgensen BM (2009) A fully robust PARAFAC method for analyzing fluorescence data. J Chemom 23:124–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fabris R, Chow CWK, Drikas M et al (2008) Comparison of NOM character in selected Australian and Norwegian drinking waters. Water Res 42:4188–4196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fellman JB, D’Amore DV, Hood E et al (2008) Fluorescence characteristics and biodegradability of dissolved organic matter in forest and wetland soils from coastal temperate watersheds in southeast Alaska. Biogeochemistry 88:169–184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier SW, Nowack KO, Goins KM, Cannon FS, Kaplan LA, hatcher PG (2003) Characterization of organic matter from natural waters using tetramethylammonium hydroxide thermochemolysis GC-MS. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 70:99–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frimmel FH (1998) Characterization of natural organic matter as major constituents in aquatic systems. J Contam Hydrol 35:201–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Galapate RP, Baes AU, Ito K et al (1998) Detection of domestic wastes in Kurose River using synchronous fluorescence spectroscopy. Water Res 32(7):2232–2239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gjessing ET, Egeberg PK, Harkedal J (1999) Natural organic matter in drinking water—the NOM typing project, background and basic characteristics of original water samples and NOM isolates. Environ Int 25:145–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gregor J, Maršálek B (2005) A simple in vivo fluorescence method for the selective detection and quantification of freshwater cyanobacteria and eukaryothic algae. Acta Hydrochimica Hydrobiologica 33(2):142–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gregor J, Maršálek B, Šípková H (2007) Detection and estimation of potentially toxic cyanobacteria in raw water at the drinking water treatment plant by in vivo fluorescence method. Water Res 41:228–234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hallam NB, West JR, Forster CF et al (2001) The potential for biofilm growth in water distribution systems. Water Res 34(17):4063–4071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helms JR, Stubbins A, Ritchie JD et al (2008) Absorption spectral slopes and slope ratios as indicators of molecular weight, source, and photobleaching of chromophoric dissolved organic matter. Limnol Oceanogr 53(3):955–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson R, Parsons S, Jefferson B (2008a) The impact of algal properties and pre-oxidation on solid–liquid separation of algae. Water Res 42:1827–1845

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson RK, Baker A, Parsons SA et al (2008b) Characterisation of algogenic organic matter extracted from cyanobacteria, green algae and diatoms. Water Res 42:3435–3445

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson RK, Baker A, Murphy KR et al (2009) Fluorescence as a potential monitoring tool for recycled water systems: a review. Water Res 43(4):863–881

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Her N, Amy G, Foss D et al (2002) Variations of molecular weight estimation by HP-Size exclusion Chromatography with UVA versus online DOC detection. Environ Sci Technol 36:3393–3399

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Her N, Amy G, McKnight D et al (2003) Characterization of DOM as a function of MW by fluorescence EEM and HPLC-SEC using UVA, DOC, and fluorescence detection. Water Res 37:4295–4303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson NJ, Baker A, Reynolds D (2007) Fluorescence analysis of dissolved organic matter in natural, waste and polluted waters–a review. River Res Appl 23(6):631–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hur J, Hwang S-J, Shin J-K (2008) Using synchronous fluorescence technique as a water quality monitoring tool for an urban river. Water Air Soil Pollut 191:231–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst AM, Edwards MJ, Chipps M, Jefferson B, Parsons SA (2004) The impact of rainstorm events on coagulation and clarifier performance in potable water treatment. Sci Total Environ 321:219–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe R, McKnight D, Maie N et al (2008) Spatial and temporal variations in DOM composition in ecosystems: the importance of long-term monitoring of optical properties. J Geophys Res 113:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone DW, Miller CM (2009) Fluorescence excitation–emission matrix regional transformation and chlorine consumption to predict trihalomethane and haloacetic acid formation. Environ Eng Sci 26(7):1163–1170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalbitz K, Geyer W, Gehre M (2000) Land use impacts on the isotopic signature (C-13, C-14, C-15) of water-soluble fulvic acids in German fen area. Soil Sci 165(9):728–736

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khoury AE, Nicholov R, Soltes S et al (1992) A preliminary assessment of pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development using fluorescence spectroscopy. Int Biodeterioration Biodegradation 30:187–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitis M, Karafani T, Kilduff JE et al (2001) The reactivity of natural organic matter to disinfection by-products formation and its relation to specific ultraviolet absorbance. Water Sci Technol 43:9–16

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Korshin GV, Kumke MU, Li C-W et al (1999) Influence of chlorination on chromophores and fluorophores in humic substances. Environ Sci Technol 33:1207–1212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laabs C, Amy G, Jekel M (2004) Organic colloids and their influence on low-pressure membrane filtration. Water Sci Technol 50(12):311–316

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lakowicz JR (1999) Principles of fluorescence spectroscopy. 2nd Edition Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers

  • Leboulanger C, Dorigo U, Jacquet S et al (2002) Application of a submerge spectrofluorometer for rapid monitoring of freshwater cyanobacterial blooms: a case study. Aquat Microb Ecol 30:83–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leenheer JA (1981) Comprehensive approach to preparative isolation and fractionation of dissolved organic carbon from natural waters and wastewaters. Environ Sci Technol 15(5):578–587

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li JK, Humprey AE (1991) Use of fluorometry for monitoring and control of a bioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 37:1043–1049

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marhaba T, Van D, Lippincott RL (2000) Rapid identification of dissolved organic matter fractions in water by spectral fluorescent signatures. Water Res 34(14):3543–3550

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marhaba TF, Bengraine K, Pu Y et al (2003) Spectral fluorescence signatures and partial least squares regression: model to predict dissolved organic carbon in water. J Hazard Mater B97:83–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marhaba TF, Borgaonkar AD, Punburananon K (2009) Principal component regression model applied to dimensionally reduced spectral fluorescent signature for the determination of organic character and THM formation potential of source water. J Hazard Mater 169:998–1004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maurice PA, Cabaniss SE, Drummond J et al (2002) Hydrogeochemical controls on the variations in chemical characteristics of natural organic matter at a small freshwater wetland. Chem Geol 187:59–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McKnight DM, Boyer EW, Westerhoff PK et al (2001) Spectrofluorometric characterization of dissolved organic matter for indication of precursor organic material and aromaticity. Limnol Oceanogr 46(1):38–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Monteith D, Stoddard JL, Evans CD et al (2007) Dissolved organic carbon trends resulting from changes in atmospheric deposition chemistry. Nature 450:537–541

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morel E, Santamaria K, Perrier M et al (2004) Application of multi-wavelength fluorometry for on-line monitoring of an anaerobic digestion process. Water Res 38(14–15):3287–3296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nagao S, Matsunaga T, Suzuki Y et al (2003) Characteristics of humic substances in the Kuji river waters as determined by high-performance size exclusion chromatography with fluorescence detection. Water Res 37:4159–4170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nam S-N, Amy G (2008) Differentiation of wastewater effluent organic matter (EfOM) from natural organic matter (NOM) using multiple analytical techniques. Water Sci Technol 57(7):1009–1015

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen M-L, Westerhoff P, Baker L et al (2005) Characteristics and reactivity of algae-produced dissolved organic carbon. J Environ Eng 131(11):1574–1582

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons SA, Jefferson B, Goslan EH et al (2004) Natural organic matter—the relationship between character and treatability. Water Sci Technol Water Supply 4(5–6):43–48

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peiris BR, Halle C, Haberkamp J et al (2008) Assessing nanofiltration fouling in drinking water treatment using fluorescence fingerprinting and LC-OCD analyses. Water Sci Technol Water Supply 8:459–465

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto AM, von Sperling E, Moreira RM (2001) Chlorophyll-A determination via contiuous measurement of plankton fluorescence methodology development. Water Res 35(16):3977–3981

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds DM, Ahmad SR (1995) The effect of metal ions on the fluorescence of sewage wastewater. Water Res 29(9):2214–2216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roccaro P, Vagliasindi GA, Korshin GV (2009) Changes in NOM Fluorescence caused by chlorination and their associations with disinfection by-products formation. Environ Sci Technol 43:724–729

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Zuniga UF, Milori D, Da Silva WTL, Martin-Neto L, Oliviera LC, Rocha JC (2008) Changes in optical properties caused by UV-irradiation of aquatic humic substances from the amazon river basin: Seasonal variability evaluation. Environ Sci Technol 42:1948–1953

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Senesi N (1990) Molecular and quantitative aspects of the chemistry of fulvic acid and its interaction with metal ions and organic chemicals. Part 2. The fluorescence spectroscopy approach. Anal Chim Acta 232:77–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp EL, Parsons SA, Jefferson B (2006) Seasonal variations in natural organic matter and its impact on coagulation in water treatment. Sci Total Environ 363:183–194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson DR (2008) Biofilm processes in biologically active carbon water purification–review. Water Res 42:2839–2848

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Skibsted E, Lindemann C, Roca C et al (2001) On-line bioprocess monitoring with a multi-wavelength fluorescence sensor using multivariate calibration. J Biotechnol 88(1):47–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith CB, Anderson JE, Webb SR (2004) Detection of bacillus endospores using total luminescence spectroscopy. Spectrochmica Acta Part A 60:2517–2521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer RGM, Pellerin BA, Bergamaschi BA et al (2007) Diurnal variability in riverine dissolved organic matter composition determined by in situ optical measurement in the San Joaquin River (California, USA). Hydrol Process 21(23):3181–3189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stedmon CA, Markager S (2005) Resolving the variability in dissolved organic matter fluorescence in a temperate estuary and its catchment using PARAFAC analysis. Limnol Oceanogr 50(2):686–697

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stedmon CS, Markager S, Bro R (2003) Tracing dissolved organic matter in aquatic environments using a new approach to fluorescence spectroscopy. Mar Chem 82(3–4):239–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Świetlik J, Sikorska E (2004) Application of fluorescence spectroscopy in the studies of natural organic matter fractions reactivity with chlorine dioxide and ozone. Water Res 38:3791–3799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JD (1997) The role of dissolved organic matter, particularly free amino acids and humic substances, in freshwater ecosystems. Freshw Biol 38:1–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen M, Lassen P, Dobel S, Hansen PE, Carlsen L, Mogensen BB (2002) Characterisation of humic materials of different origin: a multivariate approach for quantifying the latent properties of dissolved organic matter. Chemosphere 49:1327–1337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thurman EM (1985) Organic geochemistry of natural waters. Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk Publishers, Dortrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Twardowski MS, Boss E, Sullivan JM et al (2004) Modeling the spectral shape of absorption by chromophoric dissolved organic matter. Mar Chem 89:69–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Velten S, Hammes F, Boller M et al (2007) Rapid and direct estimation of active biomass on granular activated carbon through adenosine tri-phosphate (ATP) determination. Water Res 41:1973–1983

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weishaar JL, Aiken GR, Bergamaschi BA et al (2003) Evaluation of specific ultraviolet absorbance as an indicator of the chemical composition and reactivity of dissolved organic carbon. Environ Sci Technol 37(20):4702–4708

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Westerhoff P, Aiken G, Amy G et al (1999) Relationship between the structure of natural organic matter and its reactivity towards molecular ozone and hydroxyl radicals. Water Res 33(10):2265–2276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf G, Almeida J, Crespo JG et al (2007) An improved method for two-dimensional fluorescence monitoring of complex bioreactors. J Biotechnol 128:801–812

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Worrall F, Burt TP (2007) Trends in DOC concentration in great Britain. J Hydrol 346:81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu FC, Evans RD, Dillon PJ (2003a) Separation and characterization of NOM by high-performance liquid chromatography and on-line three-dimensional excitation emission matrix fluorescence detection. Environ Sci Technol 37(16):3687–3693

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu WW, Chadik PA, Delfino JJ (2003b) The relationship between disinfection by-product formation and structural characteristics of humic substances in chloramination. Environ Toxicol Chem 22(12):2845–2852

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xiaoying Y (2001) Humic acids from endemic arsenicosis areas in Inner Mongolia and from the Blackfoot-disease areas in Taiwan: a comparative study. Environ Geochem Health 23:27–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Shang C, Lee W et al (2008) Correlations between organic matter properties and DBP formation during chloramination. Water Res 42:2329–2339

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yentsch CS, Phinney DA (1985) Spectral fluorescence: an ataxonomic tool for studying the structure of phytoplankton populations. J Plankton Research 7(5):617–632

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Bridgeman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bridgeman, J., Bieroza, M. & Baker, A. The application of fluorescence spectroscopy to organic matter characterisation in drinking water treatment. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 10, 277–290 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-011-9243-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-011-9243-x

Keywords

Navigation