Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

What knowledge do early childhood teachers use during literacy instruction? Using stimulated recall to investigate an unexplored phenomenon

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study utilized a novel phenomenological approach with a stimulated recall procedure to understand the pedagogical reasoning of eight early child teachers during the enactment of literacy instruction in whole-group meeting and language arts activities. This approach to investigating knowledge—in contrast to more traditional conceptualizations of knowledge—focused on knowledge use as a process and prioritized teachers’ perspectives on knowledge used to enact literacy instruction in their own classrooms. Additionally, it allowed for a more nuanced investigation of the role of setting and teacher characteristics that are often examined in association with literacy instruction (e.g., degree attainment, years of experience, curriculum, instructional activity). Six types of knowledge were used by teachers in their pedagogical reasoning. In order of frequency of use these were knowledge of: goals for instruction, children, feelings, school environment, developing skills, and past experiences. Importantly, teachers made more references to knowledge derived from their immediate contexts as compared to decontextualized knowledge. Implications for understanding connections between knowledge and literacy instruction are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

De-identified transcripts available upon request.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

Notes

  1. Although there may be questions regarding the developmental appropriateness and datedness of the curriculum utilized by the ABC School, that is beyond the scope of this study. The use of this curriculum can be summarized in the director’s explanation, “I think it’s important to focus on learning letters, phonics, and handwriting. I don’t like to do all of this new stuff.” During data collection, children were observed actively engaging in the activities and subsequent analyses will delve into patterns of difference regarding the school-level curriculum.

References

  • Averill, J. B. (2002). Matrix analysis as a complementary analytic strategy in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Health Research, 12(6), 855–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Peretz, M. (2011). Teacher knowledge: what is it? How do we uncover it? What are its implications for schooling? Teaching and Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.07.015

  • Borko, H., & Putnam, R. (1996). Learning to teach. In D. Berliner, & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 673–708). Macmillan

  • Cash, A. H., Cabell, S. Q., Hamre, B. K., DeCoster, J., & Pianta, R. C. (2015). Relating prekindergarten teacher beliefs and knowledge to children’s language and literacy development. Teaching and Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1988). Studying teachers’ knowledge of classrooms: Collaborative research, ethics and the negotiation of narrative. The Journal of Educational Thought, 22(2A), 269–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. M., & Yinger, R. J. (1977). Teachers’ thinking. In P.L. Peterson & H.J. Walberg (Eds.), Research on teaching. (pp. 231–263). McCutchan

  • Cohen, D. K., Raudenbush, S. W., & Ball, D. L. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737025002119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage publications

  • Cox, M. E., Hollingsworth, H., & Buysse, V. (2015). Exploring the professional development landscape: Summary from four states. Early Childhood Research Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2015.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications

  • Cui, J., & Natzke, L. (2020). Early Childhood Program Participation: 2019 (NCES 2020-075), National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2020075

  • Cunningham, A. E., Zibulsky, J., & Callahan, M. D. (2009). Starting small: Building preschool teacher knowledge that supports early literacy development. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 287–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, J., & Harbaugh, A. G. (2020). Where and when is support for vocabulary development occurring in preschool classrooms? Journal of Early Childhood Literacy. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798418763990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, J., & Schachter, R. E. (2020). Going beyond defining: Preschool educators’ use of knowledge in their pedagogical reasoning about vocabulary instruction. Dyslexia. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Early, D. M., Iruka, I. U., Ritchie, S., Barbarin, O. A., Winn, D. M. C., Crawford, G. M. & Pianta, R. C. (2010). How do pre-kindergarteners spend their time? Gender, ethnicity, and income as predictors of experiences in pre-kindergarten classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25(2), 177–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87(3), 215–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. (2015). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw Hill Education

  • Friedman-Krauss, A. H., Barnett, W. S., Garver, K. A., Hodges, K. S., Weisenfeld, G. G., & DiCrecchio, N. (2019). The state of preschool 2018. National Institute for Early Education Research

  • Friesen, A., & Butera, G. (2012). ‘You introduce all of the alphabet… But I do not think is should be the main focus’: Exploring early childhood educators’ decisions about reading instruction. Early Childhood Education Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-012-0530-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuligni, A. S., Howes, C., Huang, Y., Hong, S. S., & Lara-Cinisomo, S. (2012). Activity settings and daily routines in preschool classrooms: Diverse experiences in early learning settings for low-income children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(2), 198–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerde, H. K., & Powell, D. R. (2009). Teacher education, book reading practices, and children’s language growth across one year of Head Start. Early Education and Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409280802595417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Happo, I., Määttä, K., & Uusiautti, S. (2013). How do early childhood education teachers perceive their expertise? A qualitative study of child care providers in Lapland Finland. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41(4), 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-012-0551-8

  • Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. W. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how can we get one? Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hindman, A. H., & Wasik, B. A. (2008). Head Start teachers’ beliefs about language and literacy instruction. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23(4), 479–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2008.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hindman, A. H., & Wasik, B. A. (2011). Measuring teachers’ knowledge about early language and literacy: Practical implications and considerations. NHSA Dialog. https://doi.org/10.1080/15240754.2011.618647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, A. W., Davis, H., & Pape, S. J. (2006). Teacher Knowledge and Beliefs. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 715–737). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers

  • Justice, L. M., Mashburn, A. J., Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2008). Quality of language and literacy instruction in preschool classrooms serving at-risk pupils. Early Childhood Research Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2007.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendeou, P., Van den Broek, P., White, M. J., & Lynch, J. S. (2009). Predicting reading comprehension in early elementary school: The independent contributions of oral language and decoding skills. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, M. D., & Ervin-Tripp, S. M. (1993). Structured coding for the study of language and social interaction. In J. A. Edwards, & M. D. Lampert’s (Eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research (pp. 169–205). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

  • Long, T., & Johnson, M. (2000). Rigour, reliability and validity in qualitative research. Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing (2000)4, 30–37

  • Macmillan/Mcgraw-Hill School Division. (1995). Beginning to Read, Write, and Listen K-1. Macmillan/Mcgraw-Hill

  • Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2014). Designing qualitative research. Sage publications

  • Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography—describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Sage

  • National Association for the Education of Young Children. (2020). Developmentally Appropriate Practice. National Association for the Education of Young Children. https://www.naeyc.org/sites/default/files/globally-shared/downloads/PDFs/resources/position-statements/dap-statement_0.pdf

  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2021). Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d19/tables/dt19_202.10.asp

  • National Early Literacy Panel. (2008). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy

  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Early Child Care Research Network. (2000). The relation of childcare to cognitive and language development. Child Development. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of curriculum studies, 19(4), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027870190403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, S. B., & Cunningham L. (2009). The impact of professional development and coaching on early language and literacy instructional practices. American Educational Research Journal, 46(2), 532–566. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208328088

  • Nilsson, P. (2009). From lesson plan to new comprehension: Exploring student teachers’ pedagogical reasoning in learning about teaching. European Journal of Teacher Education. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02619760802553048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NVivo qualitative data analysis software, QSR International Party Limited. Release 1.3(535)

  • O’Leary, P. M., Cockburn, M. K., Powell, D. R., & Diamond, K. E. (2010). Head Start teachers’ views of phonological awareness and vocabulary knowledge instruction. Early Childhood Education Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-010-0394-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelatti, C. Y., Piasta, S. B., Justice, L. M., & O’Connell, A. A. (2014). Language- and literacy-learning opportunities in early childhood classrooms: Children’s typical experiences and within-classroom variability. Early Childhood Research Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D. A., Gormley, W. T., & Lowenstein, A. E. (2009). Inside the pre-kindergarten door: Classroom climate and instructional time allocation in Tulsa’s pre-K programs. Early Childhood Research Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2009.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piasta, S. B. (2016). Current understandings of what works to support the development of emergent literacy in early childhood classrooms. Child Development Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piasta, S. B., Park, S., Farley, K. S., Justice, L. M., & O’Connell, A. A. (2020). Early childhood educators’ knowledge about language and literacy: Associations with practice and children’s learning. Dyslexia. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piasta, S. B., Soto Ramirez, P., Farley, K. S., Justice, L. M., & Park, S. (2020). Exploring the nature of associations between educators’ knowledge and their emergent literacy classroom practices. Reading and Writing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-10013-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risko, V. J., Vukelich, C., & Roskos, K. (2009). Detailing reflection instruction: The efficacy of a guided instructional procedure on prospective teachers’ pedagogical reasoning. Action in Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2009.10463517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saldaña, J., & Omasta, M. (2016). Qualitative research: Analyzing life. Sage Publications

  • Schachter, R. E. (2017). Early childhood teachers’ pedagogical reasoning about how children learn during language and literacy instruction. International Journal of Early Childhood. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-017-0179-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schachter, R. E., & Freeman, D. (2015). Using stimulated recall to study teachers and teaching: A brief introduction to the research methodology. Temas e Rumos nas Pesquisas em Linguistica (Aplicada): Questos empiricas, eticas e praticas, 1, 223–243

  • Schachter, R. E., & Freeman, D. (2020). Bridging the Public and Private in the Study of Teaching: Revisiting the Research Argument. Harvard Educational Review 90(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-90.1.1

  • Schachter, R. E., Piasta, S., & Justice, L. (2020). An investigation into the curricula (and quality) used by early childhood educators. NHSA Dialog, 23(2). https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3655-4702

  • Schachter, R. E., Spear, C. F., Piasta, S. B., Justice, L. M., & Logan, J. A. R. (2016). Early childhood educators’ knowledge, beliefs, experiences, and children’s language- and literacy-learning opportunities: What is the connection? Early Childhood Research Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2016.01.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schleppegrell, M. J. (2012). Academic language in teaching and learning: Introduction to the special issue. Elementary School Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/663297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafto, P., Goodman, N. D., & Griffiths, T. L. (2014). A rational account of pedagogical reasoning: Teaching by, and learning from, examples. Cognitive Psychology, https://. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B., & McGannon, K. R. (2018). Developing rigor in qualitative research: problems and opportunities within sport and exercise psychology. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11(1), 101–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2017.1317357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). National Reading Council. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. National Academies Press

  • Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 7, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.7275/z6fm-2e34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Institute of Medicine & National Research Council. (2012). The early childhood care and education workforce: Challenges and opportunities: A workshop report. The National Academies Press

  • Wagner, A. C. (1987). Knots in teachers’ thinking. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring Teachers’ Thinking, (pp. 161–178). Cassell

  • Wasik, B., & Hindman, A. (2011). Handbook of early literacy research. In S.B. Neuman, & D.K. Dickinson (Eds.), Identifying critical components of an effective preschool language and literacy coaching intervention (pp. 322–336)

  • Whitebook, M., McLean, C., Austin, L. J. E., & Edwards, B. (2018). Early Childhood Workforce Index—2018. Center for the Study of Child Care Employment, University of California, Berkeley

  • Whitehurst, G. J., & Lonigan, C. J. (1998). Child development and emergent literacy. Child Development, 69, 848–872. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06247.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, T. S., Parks, A. N., Wilinski, B., Domke, L. M., & Hopkins, L. J. (2020). Examining certification requirements in early math and literacy: What do states expect prekindergarten teachers to know? https://doi.org/www10.1177/0022487120905514

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel E. Schachter.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest/Competing interests

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schachter, R.E. What knowledge do early childhood teachers use during literacy instruction? Using stimulated recall to investigate an unexplored phenomenon. Read Writ 35, 2177–2200 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10254-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10254-w

Keywords

Navigation