Abstract
This paper investigates whether or not lexical stress is used for lexical access in Spanish. A lexical decision task and a masking priming procedure were used to compare correctly-versus-incorrectly stressed words (e.g., técla-TECLA vs. teclá-TECLA). SOA (Stimulus Onset Asynchrony) was manipulated at 33, 66, 100, and 143 ms. The results showed that congruent condition was easier, but in 143 ms SOA only. Furthermore, while congruent condition did not differ from a control identity condition (e.g., tecla-TECLA) incongruent condition was slower, but in 100 and 143 ms SOA only. All these results suggest that stress affects lexical access at a late stage of lexical access processing. Reading models should be re-designed in order to include lexical stress as another phonological code which is used for reading.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For example, while áctor would be possible (because the stress mark is used to indicate an exception to the general rule that words ending in a consonant have final stress) actór is not possible (because the stress mark can not be used in the final syllable except when it ends in a vowel or in n or s). Similarly, técla (key) is not possible (because words with penultimate stress never bear the stress mark when they end in a vowel) while teclá would be possible.
References
Alameda, J. R., & Cuetos, F. (1995). Diccionario de frecuencias de las unidades lingüísticas del Castellano [Spanish frequency dictionary of linguistics units]. Servicio de publicaciones de la Universidad de Oviedo.
Álvarez, C. J., Carreiras, M., & de Vega, M. (1992). Estudio estadístico de la ortografía castellana (1). La frecuencia silábica [A statistical study of Spanish orthography (1). Syllable frequency]. Cognitiva, 4, 75–105.
Álvarez, C., de Vega, M., & Carreiras, M. (1998). La sílaba como unidad de activación léxica en la lectura de palabras trisílabas [The syllable as activational unit in reading trisyllabic words]. Psicothema, 10, 371–386.
Ashby, J., & Clifton, C. (2005). The prosodic property of lexical stress affects eye movements during silent reading. Cognition, 96, 89–100.
Black, M., & Byng, S. (1986). Prosodic constraints on lexical access in reading. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 3, 369–409.
Black, M., & Byng, S. (1989). Re-stressing prosody: A reply to cutler, howard, and patterson. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 6, 85–92.
Brown, R. (1958). Words and things: An introduction to language. New York: Free Press.
Burani, C., & Arduino L. S. (2004). Stress regularity or consistency? Reading aloud Italian polysyllables with different stress patterns. Brain and Language, 90, 318–325.
Cappa, S. F., Nespor, M., Ielasi, W., & Miozzo, A. (1997). The representation of stress: Evidence from an aphasic patient. Cognition, 65, 1–13.
Carreiras, M., Álvarez, C. J., & de Vega, M. (1993). Syllable frequency and visual word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 766–780.
Carreiras, M., & Perea, M. (2002). Masked priming effects with syllabic neighbors in a lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1228–1242.
Colombo, L. (1992). Lexical stress effect and its interaction with frequency in word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 987–1003.
Coltheart, M., & Rastle, K. (1994). Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dual-route models of reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1197–1211.
Cutler, A., Dahan, D., & Donselaar, W. (1997). Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: A literature review. Language & Speech, 40, 141–201.
Cutler, A., Howard, D., & Patterson, K. E. (1989). Misplaced stress on prosody: A reply to Black and Byng. Cognitive Neuropsychology 6, 67–83.
Donselaar, W., Koster, M., & Cutler, A. (2005). Exploring the role of lexical stress in lexical recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 251–273.
Ferrand, L., Segui, J., & Grainger, J. (1996). Masked priming of word and picture naming: The role of syllabic units. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 708–723.
Fodor, J. D. (1998). Learning to parse? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27, 285–319.
Frost, R. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 71–99.
Goswami, U. (2003). How to beat dyslexia. The Psychologist, 16, 462–465.
Gutiérrez, N. (2003). El acento léxico y su función en el reconocimiento de palabras escritas en adultos y en niños [Lexical stress and its role in written word recognition by adults and children]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universidad de Granada, Spain.
Gutiérrez, N. (2005). Stress assignment in reading Spanish: Stressing pseudowords. Paper presented at the VII Simposio de Psicolingüística, Valencia, Spain.
Gutiérrez, N., & Palma, A. (2004). Lexical stress and reading: a study with children. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 2, 143–160.
Jacobs, A. M., Rey, A., Ziegler, J. C., Grainger, J. (1998). MROM-p: An interactive activation, multiple readout model of orthographic and phonological processes in visual word recognition. In J. Grainger & A. M. Jacobs (Eds.), Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition (pp. 147–188). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kelly, M. H. (2004). Words onset patterns and lexical stress in English. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 231–244.
Kelly, M. H., Morris, J., & Verrekia, L. (1998). Orthographic cues to lexical stress: Effects on naming and lexical decision. Memory & Cognition, 26, 822–832.
Miceli, G., & Caramazza, A. (1993). The assignment of word stress in oral reading: Evidence from a case of acquired dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10, 273–296.
Pitt, M. A., & Samuel, A. G. (1990). The use of rhythm in attending to speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 564–573.
Protopapas, A. (2006). On the use and usefulness of stress diacritics in reading Greek. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19, 171–178.
Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (2000). Lexical and nonlexical print-to-sound translation of disyllabic words and pseudowords. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 342–364.
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372–422.
Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Schneider, W. (1989). Micro Experimental Laboratory (MEL): An integrated software system for computerized experimentation for research and instruction on IBM PC-compatible computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 21, 240–244.
Sebastián-Gallés, N., & Costa, A. (1997). Metrical information in speech segmentation in Spanish. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 883–887.
Slowiaczek, L. (1990). Effects of auditory stress in auditory word recognition. Language and Speech, 33, 47–68.
Soto-Faraco, S., Sebastian-Gallés, N., & Cutler, A. (2001). Segmental and suprasegmental mismatch in lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 412–432.
Whalley, K., & Hansen, J. (2006). The role of prosodic sensitivity in children’s reading development. Journal of Research in Reading, 29, 288–303.
Wood, C. (2006). Sensitivity to speech rhythm and the development of reading. In F. Columbus (Ed.), Trends in cognitive psychology research (pp. 171–181). New York: Nova Science.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their comments on the previous draft of this manuscript. Thanks are also due to the Spanish Government for its support through the project titled ‘Marcos estructurales y su utilización en Percepción, Producción y Adquisición del Lenguaje [Structural Frames in Language Perception, Production, and Acquisition]’, reference: BS02002-02993.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Appendix I Lists of words
Appendix II Lists of pseudowords
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gutiérrez-Palma, N., Palma-Reyes, A. On the use of lexical stress in reading Spanish. Read Writ 21, 645–660 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9082-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9082-x