Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Chinese standardized outcomes in nephrology–hemodialysis fatigue (C-SONG–HD fatigue) scale: a study of Chinese patients undergoing hemodialysis

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to translate and culturally adapt the standardized outcomes in nephrology–hemodialysis fatigue (SONG–HD fatigue) scale and to assess the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the SONG–HD fatigue (C-SONG–HD fatigue) scale.

Methods

Forward and back translations were used to translate the SONG–HD fatigue scale into Chinese. We used the C-SONG–HD fatigue scale to survey Chinese patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) in China. We examined the distribution of responses and floor and ceiling effects. Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s omega coefficient, intraclass coefficients, and Spearman correlations were used to assess internal consistency reliability, test–retest reliability, and convergent validity, respectively. Responsiveness was also evaluated.

Results

In total, 489 participants across southeast China, northwest China, and central China completed the study. The C-SONG–HD fatigue scale had good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient 0.861, omega coefficient 0.916), test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.695), and convergent validity (Spearman correlation 0.691). The analysis of all first-time HD patients did not show notable responsiveness, and only patients with temporary vascular access had good responsiveness with an effect size (ES) of 0.54, a standardized response mean (SRM) of 0.85, and a standard error of measurement (SEM) of 0.77.

Conclusion

The Chinese version of the SONG–HD fatigue scale showed satisfactory reliability and validity in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) in China. It could be used as a tool to measure the fatigue of Chinese HD patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data underlying this article are available in the article and in its online supplementary material.

References

  1. Weisbord, S. D., Fried, L. F., Arnold, R. M., et al. (2005). Prevalence, severity, and importance of physical and emotional symptoms in chronic hemodialysis patients. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 16, 2487–2494.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Artom, M., Moss-Morris, R., Caskey, F., & Chilcot, J. (2014). fatigue in advanced kidney disease. Kidney International, 86, 497–505.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jhamb, M., Pike, F., Ramer, S., Argyropoulos, C., et al. (2011). Impact of fatigue on outcomes in the hemodialysis (HEMO) study. American Journal of Nephrology, 33, 515–523.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bossola, M., Di Stasio, E., Antocicco, M., et al. (2015). fatigue is associated with increased risk of mortality in patients on chronic hemodialysis. Nephron, 130, 113–118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jhamb, M., Argyropoulos, C., Steel, J. L., et al. (2009). Choices for healthy outcomes in caring for end-stage renal disease (CHOICE) study: Correlates and outcomes of fatigue among incident dialysis patients. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 4, 1779–1786.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Jacobson, J., Ju, A., Baumgart, A., et al. (2019). Patient perspectives on the meaning and impact of fatigue in hemodialysis: A systematic review and thematic analysis of qualitative studies. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 74, 179–192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Urquhart-Secord, R., Craig, J. C., Hemmelgarn, B., et al. (2016). Patient and caregiver priorities for outcomes in hemodialysis: An international nominal group technique study. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 68, 444–454.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kalantar-Zadeh, K., Lockwood, M. B., Rhee, C. M., et al. (2022). Patient-centred approaches for the management of unpleasant symptoms in kidney disease. Nature Reviews Nephrology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-021-00518-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sakkas, G. K., & Karatzaferi, C. (2012). Hemodialysis fatigue just simple fatigue or a syndrome on its own right. Frontiers in Physiology, 31(3), 306.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jhamb, M., Liang, K., Yabes, J., et al. (2013). Prevalence and correlates of fatigue in chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease: Are sleep disorders a key to understanding fatigue? American Journal of Nephrology, 38, 489–495.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gregg, L. P., Jain, N., Carmody, T., et al. (2019). fatigue in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease: Correlates and association with kidney outcomes. American Journal of Nephrology, 50, 37–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jhamb, M., Weisbord, S. D., Steel, J. L., & Unruh, M. (2008). fatigue in patients receiving maintenance dialysis: A review of definitions, measures, and contributing factors. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 52(2), 353–365.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Ju, A., Teixeira-Pinto, A., Tong, A., et al. (2020). Validation of a core patient-reported outcome measure for fatigue in patients receiving hemodialysis: The SONG–HD fatigue instrument. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 15, 1614–1621.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C., & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46(12), 1417–1432.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., et al. (2005). Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: Report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health., 8(2), 94–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D., de Boer, M. R., et al. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yellen, S. B., Cella, D. F., Webster, K., et al. (1997). Measuring fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms with the functional assessment of cancer therapy (FACT) measurement system. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 13(2), 63–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cella, D., Lai, J. S., Chang, C. H., et al. (2002). fatigue in cancer patients compared with fatigue in the general United States population. Cancer, 94, 528–538.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cella, D., Yount, S., Sorensen, M., et al. (2005). Validation of the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy fatigue scale relative to other instrumentation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of Rheumatology, 32, 811–819.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ju, A., Unruh, M., Davison, S., et al. (2018). SONG–HD fatigue workshop collaborators: Establishing a core outcome measure for fatigue in patients on hemodialysis: A standardized outcomes in nephrology–hemodialysis (SONG–HD) consensus workshop report. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 72, 104–112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, S. Y., Zang, X. Y., Liu, J. D., Gao, M., Cheng, M., & Zhao, Y. (2015). Psychometric properties of the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-fatigue (FACIT-fatigue) in Chinese patients receiving maintenance dialysis. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 49(1), 135–143.

    Article  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cappelleri, J. C., & Bushmakin, A. G. (2014). Interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 23(5), 460–483.

    Article  MathSciNet  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Green, S. B., & Yang, Y. (2008). Commentary on coefficient alpha: A cautionary tale. Psychometrika, 74, 121–135.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Flora, D. B. (2020). Your coefficient alpha is probably wrong, but which coefficient omega is right? A tutorial on using R to obtain better reliability estimates. AMPPS, 3, 484–501.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Altman Dg, S. K. M. D., & Pc, L. T. C. G. (2001). The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine, 134, 663–694.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (2003). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Liang, M. H., Fossel, A. H., & Larson, M. G. (1990). Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Medical Care, 28(7), 632–642.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fang, J. (2006). Quality of life: measurement method and application. Peking University Medical Press. in Chinese.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Crosby, R. D., Kolotkin, R. L., & Williams, G. R. (2003). Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 56(5), 395–407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Association, W. M. (2013). World medical association declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA, 310(20), 2191–2194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Weldring, T., & Smith, S. M. (2013). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Health Services Insights, 6, 61–68.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Erek, E., Su¨leymanlar, G., Serdengec¸ti, K., et al. (2002). Registry of the nephrologist, dialysis and transplantation in Turkey. Registry 2001. Turkish Society of Nephrology.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Letchmi, S., Das, S., Halim, H., et al. (2011). fatigue experienced by patients receiving maintenance dialysis in hemodialysis units. Nursing and Health Sciences, 13, 60–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Liu, H. E. (2006). fatigue and associated factors in hemodialysis patients in Taiwan. Research in Nursing and Health, 29, 40–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zheng, X.-Y., Zhang, Z.-H., Cheng, Y.-M., et al. (2023). Factors associated with subgroups of fatigue in maintenance hemodialysis patients: A cross-sectional study. Renal Failure, 45(1), 2221129.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Bossola, M., & Tazza, L. (2006). Postdialysis fatigue: A frequent and debilitating symptom. Seminars in Dialysis, 29(3), 222–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sklar, A. H., Riesenberg, L. A., Silber, A. K., Ahmed, W., & Ali, A. (1996). Postdialysis fatigue. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 28, 732–736.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Horigan, A. E., & Barroso, J. V. (2016). A comparison of temporal patterns of fatigue in patients on hemodialysis. Nephrology Nursing Journal, 43, 129–138.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are greatly indebted to Angela Ju from the Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, the University of Sydney in Australia for her valuable guidance and great support in the process of translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Chinese version of the SONG–HD fatigue. The authors acknowledge all the translators’ support during the translation and cross-cultural adaption process. The authors express their appreciation to all respondents taking part in the present study and some friends for offering support in data collection.

Funding

This work was sponsored by the Fund of the Fujian Science and Technology Department (2021J01363).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lan-ting Huang or Fu-yuan Hong.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Nothing to disclose.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants followed the institutional and/or national research committee at which the studies were conducted (IRB approval number K2021-09-046) with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments comparable ethical standards.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 14 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, Lt., Zheng, Xy., Zhang, Zh. et al. Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Chinese standardized outcomes in nephrology–hemodialysis fatigue (C-SONG–HD fatigue) scale: a study of Chinese patients undergoing hemodialysis. Qual Life Res 33, 745–752 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-023-03561-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-023-03561-4

Keywords

Navigation