Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Differential associations between interpersonal variables and quality-of-life in a sample of college students

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Humans are fundamentally social beings, and the relationships we form with others are crucial for our well-being. Research across a variety of domains has established the association between a variety of interpersonal factors and health outcomes, including quality-of-life. However, there is a need for a more integrative, holistic analysis of these variables and how they relate to one another.

Methods

Undergraduate students (n = 1456) from four universities across the United States completed self-report measures of their quality-of-life and a variety of interpersonal factors identified as important predictors across the literature. We examined zero-order correlations between these measures and quality-of-life, estimated a path model to look at unique variance accounted for by each, and finally used network analysis to examine the network of direct and indirect associations among these variables and quality-of-life.

Results

Loneliness had the strongest association with quality-of-life across all analyses. When examining the unique association between quality-of-life and each interpersonal variable, six remained statistically significant: loneliness, social support, social connectedness, emotional intelligence, intimacy with one’s romantic partner, and empathic concern. These results were supported by the network model, which found direct associations between quality-of-life and these six variables as well as indirect associations with all other interpersonal variables in the model.

Conclusions

Results from this research suggest that interpersonal factors in general, and loneliness in particular, are strongly associated with quality-of-life. Future research is needed to establish the direction of these effects and examine for whom these findings are generalizable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bugental, D. B. (2000). Acquisition of the algorithms of social life: A domain-based approach. Psychological Bulletin,126(2), 187–219. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.187.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Holt-Lunstad, J., & Smith, T. B. (2012). Social relationships and mortality. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00406.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., Baker, M., Harris, T., & Stephenson, D. (2015). Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: A meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science,10(2), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614568352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., & Layton, J. B. (2010). Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. PLoS Medicine,7(7), e1000316. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Mcpherson, M., Smith-lovin, L., & Brashears, M. E. (2006). Social isolation in America: Changes in core discussion networks over two decades. American Sociological Review,71(3), 353–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cigna. (2018). Cigna U.S. loneliness index. Retrieved November 20, 2018 from https://www.multivu.com/players/English/8294451-cigna-us-loneliness-survey/docs/IndexReport_1524069371598-173525450.pdf

  7. DiJulio, B., Hamel, L., Muñana, C., & Brodie, M. (2018). Loneliness and social isolation in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan: An international survey. San Francisco, CA.

  8. Cacioppo, J. T., Cacioppo, S., Capitanio, J. P., & Cole, S. W. (2015). The neuroendocrinology of social isolation. Annual Review of Psychology,66(1), 733–767. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Caspi, A., Harrington, H., Moffitt, T. E., Milne, B. J., & Poulton, R. (2006). Socially isolated children 20 years later. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine,160(8), 805. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.160.8.805.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cole, S. W., Hawkley, L. C., Arevalo, J. M., Sung, C. Y., Rose, R. M., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). Social regulation of gene expression in human leukocytes. Genome Biology,8, R189. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2007-8-9-r189.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Cacioppo, J. T., Ernst, J. M., Burleson, M. H., McClintock, M. K., Malarkey, W. B., Hawkley, L. C., et al. (2000). Lonely traits and concomitant physiological processes: The MacArthur social neuroscience studies. International Journal of Psychophysiology,35(2–3), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8760(99)00049-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. DiMatteo, M. R. (2004). Social support and patient adherence to medical treatment: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology,23(2), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.23.2.207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hawkley, L. C., Thisted, R. A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2009). Loneliness predicts reduced physical activity: Cross-sectional & longitudinal analyses. Health Psychology,28(3), 354–363. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014400.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Cacioppo, J. T., Hughes, M. E., Waite, L. J., Hawkley, L. C., & Thisted, R. A. (2006). Loneliness as a specific risk factor for depressive symptoms: Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Psychology and Aging,21(1), 140–151. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Laursen, T. M., Munk-Olsen, T., Nordentoft, M., & Mortensen, P. B. (2007). Increased mortality among patients admitted with major psychiatric disorders: A register-based study comparing mortality in unipolar depressive disorder, bipolar affective disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and schizophrenia. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.v68n0612.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wulsin, L. R., Vaillant, G. E., & Wells, V. E. (1999). A systematic review of the mortality of depression. Psychosomatic Medicine,61(1), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-199901000-00003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. House, J. S., Landis, K. R., & Umberson, D. (1988). Social relationships and health recent scientific. Science,241(4865), 540–545. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3399889.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Duck, S., & Perlman, D. (1985). The thousand islands of personal relationships: A prescriptive analysis for future explorations. In S. Duck & D. Perlman (Eds.), Understanding personal relationships: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 1–15). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Berscheid, E. (1995). Help wanted: A grand theorist of interpersonal relationships, sociologist or anthropologist preferred. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,12(4), 529–533. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407595124005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Perlman, D., & Duck, S. (2006). The seven seas of the study of personal relationships: From “The Thousand Islands” to interconnected waterways. In A. L. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 11–34). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Reis, H. T. (2007). Steps toward the ripening of relationship science. Personal Relationships,14(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00139.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schutte, N. S., Malouff, J. M., Bobik, C., Coston, T. D., Greeson, C., Jedlicka, C., et al. (2001). Emotional intelligence and interpersonal relations. The Journal of Social Psychology,141(4), 523–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540109600569.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test Revised Version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,42(2), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00715.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empthy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,44(1), 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In S. W. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (pp. 367–389). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cacioppo, J. T., Hawkley, L. C., Crawford, E. E., Ernst, J. M., Burleson, M. H., Kowalewski, R. B., et al. (2002). Loneliness and health: Potential mechanisms. Psychosomatic Medicine,64(3), 407–417. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-200205000-00005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee, R. M., Draper, M., & Lee, S. (2001). Social connectedness, dysfunctional interpersonal behaviors, and psychological distress: Testing a mediator model. Journal of Counseling Psychology,48(3), 310–318. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0167.48.3.310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sherbourne, C. D., & Stewart, A. L. (1991). The MOS social support survey. Social Science and Medicine,32(6), 705–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(91)90150-B.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kuczynski, A. M., Kanter, J. W., Wetterneck, C. T., Olaz, F. O., Singh, R. S., Lee, E. B., et al. (2019). Measuring intimacy as a contextual-behavioral process: Psychometric development and evaluation of the Awareness, Courage, and Responsiveness Scale. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2019.02.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. World Health Organization Quality of Life Group. (1998). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychological Medicine,28(3), 551–558. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291798006667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Skevington, S. M., Lotfy, M., & O’Connell, K. A. (2004). The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: Psychometric properties and results of the international field trial a Report from the WHOQOL Group. Quality of Life Research,13(2), 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QURE.0000018486.91360.00.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Masthoff, E. D., Trompenaars, F. J., Van Heck, G. L., Hodiamont, P. P., & De Vries, J. (2006). Quality of life and psychopathology: Investigations into their relationship. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry,40(4), 333–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1614.2006.01799.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gerino, E., Rollè, L., Sechi, C., & Brustia, P. (2017). Loneliness, resilience, mental health, and quality of life in old age: A structural equation model. Frontiers in Psychology,8, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Descutner, C. J., & Thelen, M. H. (1991). Development and validation of a Fear-of-Intimacy Scale. Psychological Assessment,3(2), 218–225. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.3.2.218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Greenfield, S., & Thelen, M. H. (1997). Validation of the Fear of Intimacy Scale with a lesbian and gay male population. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,14(5), 707–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407597145007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Montesi, J. L., Conner, B. T., Gordon, E. A., Fauber, R. L., Kim, K. H., & Heimberg, R. G. (2013). On the relationship among social anxiety, intimacy, sexual communication, and sexual satisfaction in young couples. Archives of Sexual Behavior,42(1), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-9929-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Thelen, M. H., Vander Wal, J. S., Thomas, A. M., & Harmon, R. (2000). Fear of intimacy among dating couples. Behavior Modification,24(2), 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445500242004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Russell, D. W. (1996). UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment,66(1), 20–40. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Cacioppo, J. T., Hawkley, L. C., Ernst, J. M., Burleson, M., Berntson, G. G., Nouriani, B., et al. (2006). Loneliness within a nomological net: An evolutionary perspective. Journal of Research in Personality,40(6), 1054–1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.11.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Cacioppo, J. T., Norris, C. J., Decety, J., & Monteleone, G. (2010). In the eye of the beholder: Individual differences in perceived social isolation predict regional brain activation to social stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,21(1), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Pinquart, M., & Sörensen, S. (2003). Risk factors for loneliness in adulthood and old age—a meta-analysis. In S. P. Shohov (Ed.), Advances in psychology research (Vol. 19, pp. 111–143). Hauppauge: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hawkley, L. C., Hughes, M. E., Waite, L. J., Masi, C. M., Thisted, R. A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2008). From social structural factors to perceptions of relationship quality and loneliness: The Chicago Health, Aging, and Social Relations Study. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences,63(6), S375–S384. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/63.6.s375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lee, R. M., & Robbins, S. B. (1995). Measuring belongingness: The social connectedness and the social assurance scales. Journal of Counseling Psychology,42(2), 232–241. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.42.2.232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lee, R. M., & Robbins, S. B. (2000). Understanding social connectedness in college women and men. Journal of Counseling & Development,78(4), 484–491. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2000.tb01932.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Lee, R. M., & Robbins, S. B. (1998). The relationship between social connectedness and anxiety, self-esteem, and social identity. Journal of Counseling Psychology,45(3), 338–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Brown, K. M., Hoye, R., & Nicholson, M. (2012). Self-esteem, self-efficacy, and social connectedness as mediators of the relationship between volunteering and well-being. Journal of Social Service Research,38(4), 468–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2012.687706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Lee, R. M., Keough, K. A., & Sexton, J. D. (2002). Social connectedness, social appraisal, and perceived stress in college women and men. Journal of Counseling and Development,80(3), 355–361. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2002.tb00200.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Giangrasso, B., & Casale, S. (2014). Psychometric properties of the Medical Outcome Study Social Support Survey with a general population sample of undergraduate students. Social Indicators Research,116(1), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0277-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Schutte, N. S., Malouff, J. M., Hall, L. E., Haggerty, D. J., Cooper, J. T., Golden, C. J., et al. (1998). Development and validation of a measure of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences,25(2), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00001-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Sánchez-Álvarez, N., Extremera, N., & Fernández-Berrocal, P. (2016). The relation between emotional intelligence and subjective well-being: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Positive Psychology,11(3), 276–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2015.1058968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Baron-Cohen, S., Bowen, D. C., Holt, R. J., Allison, C., Auyeung, B., Lombardo, M. V., et al. (2015). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test: Complete absence of typical sex difference in 400 men and women with autism. PLoS ONE,10(8), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136521.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Bora, E., Yucel, M., & Pantelis, C. (2009). Theory of mind impairment in schizophrenia: Meta-analysis. Schizophrenia Research,109(1–3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2008.12.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Oakley, B. F. M., Brewer, R., Bird, G., & Catmur, C. (2016). Theory of mind is not theory of emotion: A cautionary note on the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test. Journal of Abnormal Psychology,125(April), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Miller, R. S., & Lefcourt, H. M. (1982). The assessment of social Intimacy. Journal of Personality Assessment,46(5), 514–518. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4605_12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Anderson, T. L., & Emmers-Sommer, T. M. (2006). Predictors of relationship satisfaction in online romantic relationships. Communication Studies,57(2), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970600666834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Miller, R. S., & Lefcourt, H. M. (1983). Social intimacy: An important moderator of stressful life events. American Journal of Community Psychology,11(2), 127–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00894362.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Leonard, R. C., Knott, L. E., Lee, E. B., Singh, S., Smith, A. H., Kanter, J., et al. (2014). The development of the Functional Analytic Psychotherapy Intimacy Scale. Psychological Record,64(4), 647–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-014-0089-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Kanter, J. W., Kuczynski, A. M., Tsai, M., & Kohlenberg, R. J. (2018). A brief contextual behavioral intervention to improve relationships: A randomized trial. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.09.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology,10, 85.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Shanafelt, T. D., West, C., Zhao, X., Novotny, P., Kolars, J., Habermann, T., et al. (2005). Relationship between increased personal well-being and enhanced empathy among internal medicine residents. Journal of General Internal Medicine,20(7), 559–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-005-0102-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Péloquin, K., & Lafontaine, M. F. (2010). Measuring empathy in couples: Validity and reliability of the interpersonal reactivity index for couples. Journal of Personality Assessment,92(2), 146–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890903510399.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Glenn, A. L., Iyer, R., Graham, J., Koleva, S., & Haidt, J. (2009). Are all types of morality compromised in psychopathy? Journal of Personality Disorders,23(4), 384–398. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2009.23.4.384.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Corcoran, K. O., & Mallinckrodt, B. (2000). Adult attachment, self-efficacy, perspective taking, and conflict resoution. Journal of Counseling & Development,78(4), 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2000.tb01931.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Blatt, B., Lelacheur, S. F., Galinsky, A. D., Simmens, S. J., & Greenberg, L. (2010). Does perspective-taking increase patient satisfaction in medical encounters? Academic Medicine,85(9), 1445–1452. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181eae5ec.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved December 10, 2018 from https://www.r-project.org

  66. Šidák, Z. (1967). Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association,62(318), 626–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1967.10482935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software,48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Epskamp, S., Waldorp, L. J., Mõttus, R., & Borsboom, D. (2018). The Gaussian Graphical Model in cross-sectional and time-series data. Multivariate Behavioral Research,53, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2018.1454823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2008). Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. Biostatistics,9(3), 432–441. https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxm045.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Tibshirani, R. (1996). Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society,1, 267–288.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Epskamp, S., Cramer, A. O. J., Waldorp, L. J., Schmittmann, V. D., & Borsboom, D. (2012). qgraph: Network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. Journal of Statistical Software,48(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i04.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Chen, J., & Chen, Z. (2008). Extended Bayesian information criteria for model selection with large model spaces. Biometrika,95(3), 759–771. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asn034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Opsahl, T., Agneessens, F., & Skvoretz, J. (2010). Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths. Social Networks,32(3), 245–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2010.03.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Epskamp, S., Borsboom, D., & Fried, E. I. (2018). Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper. Behavior Research Methods,50, 195–212. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Dijkstra, E. W. (1959). A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische Mathematik,1, 269–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01386390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Isvoranu, A. M., Van Borkulo, C. D., Boyette, L. Lou, Wigman, J. T. W., Vinkers, C. H., Borsboom, D., et al. (2017). A network approach to psychosis: Pathways between childhood trauma and psychotic symptoms. Schizophrenia Bulletin,43(1), 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbw055.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Cacioppo, J. T., Hawkley, L., & Thisted, R. (2010). Perceived social isolation makes me aad: Five year cross-lagged analyses of loneliness and depressive symptomatology in the Chicago Health, Aging, and Social Relations Study. Psychology and Aging,25(2), 453–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017216.Perceived.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,36(4), 717–731. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03206553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Berry, R. E., & Williams, F. L. (1987). Assessing the relationship between quality of life and marital and income satisfaction: A path analytic approach. Journal of Marriage and the Family,49(1), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.2307/352675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Elwert, F., & Winship, C. (2014). Endogenous selection bias: The problem of conditioning on a collider variable. Annual Review of Sociology,40(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043455.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Batson, C. D., Sympson, S. C., Hindman, J. L., Decruz, P., Todd, R. M., Weeks, J. L., et al. (1996). “I’ve been there, too”: Effect on empathy of prior experience with a need. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,22(5), 474–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296225005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Ruttan, R. L., McDonnell, M. H., & Nordgren, L. F. (2015). Having “been there” doesn’t mean I care: When prior experience reduces compassion for emotional distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,108(4), 610–622. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Cacioppo, J. T., & Hawkley, L. C. (2010). Perceived social isolation and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,13(10), 447–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.06.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Maitland, D. W. M., Petts, R. A., Knott, L. E., Briggs, C. A., Moore, J. A., & Gaynor, S. T. (2016). A randomized controlled trial of Functional Analytic Psychotherapy versus watchful waiting: Enhancing social connectedness and reducing anxiety and avoidance. Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice,16(3), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1037/bar0000051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Terluin, B., De Boer, M. R., & De Vet, H. C. W. (2016). Differences in connection strength between mental symptoms might be explained by differences in variance: Reanalysis of network data did not confirm staging. PLoS ONE,11(11), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Cacioppo, J. T., & Cacioppo, S. (2014). Social relationships and health: The toxic effects of perceived social isolation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass,8(2), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12087.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Cacioppo, J. T., Fowler, J. H., & Christakis, N. A. (2009). Alone in the crowd: The structure and spread of loneliness in a large social network. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,97(6), 977–991. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016076.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. van de Mortel, T. F. (2008). Faking it: Social desirability response bias in self- report research. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing,25(4), 40–48.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Peplau, L. A., & Perlman, D. (1979). Blueprint for a social psychological theory of loneliness. In M. Cook & G. Wilson (Eds.), Love and attraction (pp. 101–110). England: Oxford.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  90. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Streiner, D. (2003). Starting at the beginning: An introduction to Coefficient Alpha and internal consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment,80(1), 99–103. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8001_18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Voracek, M., & Dressler, S. G. (2006). Lack of correlation between digit ratio (2D:4D) and Baron-Cohen’s “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test, empathy, systemising, and autism-spectrum quotients in a general population sample. Personality and Individual Differences,41(8), 1481–1491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.06.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Cook, D. A., & Beckman, T. J. (2006). Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: Theory and application. American Journal of Medicine,119(2), 166.e7–166.e16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.10.036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Washington, 119a Guthrie Hall, Box 351525, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA

    Adam M. Kuczynski & Jonathan W. Kanter

  2. Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 1 Bowdoin Square, Room 656, Boston, MA, 02114, USA

    Donald J. Robinaugh

Authors
  1. Adam M. Kuczynski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jonathan W. Kanter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Donald J. Robinaugh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam M. Kuczynski.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (University of Washington Human Subjects Division—#47191) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 212 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuczynski, A.M., Kanter, J.W. & Robinaugh, D.J. Differential associations between interpersonal variables and quality-of-life in a sample of college students. Qual Life Res 29, 127–139 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02298-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02298-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation