Skip to main content
Log in

Development and psychometric analysis of the systemic lupus erythematosus needs questionnaire (SLENQ)

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to develop a self-administered needs assessment questionnaire for people with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), assess its face, content and construct validity and test the reliability of the instrument. Eighty-four people with SLE, registered with a Lupus Resource Centre in New South Wales, Australia participated in a series of focus groups and pre and pilot testing phases in the development of a needs instrument and 594 people from a SLE support association were sent the SLE needs questionnaire (SLENQ) and the MOS-SF-36 and asked to complete both. Face and content validity were found to be high following pre and pilot testing. Principal components analysis identified seven factors with eigenvalues greater than 1, which together accounted for 53% of the total variance (psychological/spiritual/existential, health services, health information, physical, social, daily living and employment/financial needs). Internal reliability coefficients (Cronbach’s α) of all seven factor-based scales were found to be substantial, ranging from 0.77 to 0.96. Moderately significant correlation between the domains of the SLENQ and the MOS SF-36 were supportive in ascertaining concurrent validity. These findings suggest that the SLENQ provides a reliable and valid index of the global needs of people with SLE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abbreviations

MOS-SF-36:

medical outcomes study short form-36

QoL:

quality of life

SLE:

systemic lupus erythematosus

SLENQ:

systemic lupus erythematosus needs questionnaire

References

  1. Foot G. Needs assessment in tertiary and secondary oncology practice: A conceptual and methodological exposition. PhD dissertation, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, 1996

  2. Rainbird KJ. Measuring the perceived needs of patients with advanced, incurable cancer: towards evidenced based care of the dying. PhD dissertation, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, 1999

  3. Sanson-Fisher R, Girgis A, Boyes A, Bonevski B, Burton L, Cook P, The Supportive Care Review Group 2000 The unmet supportive care needs of patients with cancer. Cancer 88:226–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Girgis A, Boyes A, Sanson-Fisher RW, Burrows S 2000 Perceived needs of women diagnosed with breast cancer: rural versus urban location. Aust N Z J Public Health 24:166–73

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Davidson P, Cockburn J, Daly J, Sanson-Fisher R 2004 Patient-centred needs assessment: rationale for a psychometric measure for assessing needs in heart failure. J Cardiovasc Nurs 19(3):164–71

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Klippel J 1990 Systemic lupus erythematosus: treatment-related complications superimposed on chronic disease. J AMA 263(13):1812–815

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Iverson G 1993 Psychopathology associated with systemic lupus erythematosus: A methodological review. Semin Arthritis Rheum 22:242–51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Alarcon GS, McGwin G Jr, Uribe A et al 2005 SLE in a multi-ethnic lupus cohort (LUMINA) XV11 Predictors of self-reported health-related quality of life early in the disease course. Arthritis Rheum 51(3):465–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yen JC, Abrahamowicz M, Dobkin PL, Clarke AE, Battista RN, Fortin PR 2003 Determinants of discordance between patients and physicians in their assessment of lupus activity. J Rheum 30(9):1967–976

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang C, Mayo NE, Fortin PR 2001 The relationship between health-related quality of life and disease activity and damage in SLE. J Rheum 28(3):525–32

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hatcher L 1994 A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation modelling. SAS Institute Inc, Carey, NC

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ware JE. How to Score the Revised MOS Short Form Health Scale (SF-36). Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center Hospitals, 1988

  13. Nunnally JC 1978 Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fleis JL 1981 Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd ed. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cohen JA 1960 A co-efficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 20:37–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Foot G, Sanson-Fisher RW 1995 Measuring the unmet needs of people living with cancer. Cancer Forum 19:131–35

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the members and staff of the Lupus Association of NSW, Rachel Rossiter, Clinical Nurse Consultant, and the patients from the Scleroderma/Lupus Resource Centre, Newcastle, and Dr Glenn Reeves — Staff Specialist, Immunology, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, for their ongoing support during the many phases of this project. This paper was prepared with infrastructure support from the Hunter Medical Research Institute.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neta Moses.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moses, N., Wiggers, J., Nicholas, C. et al. Development and psychometric analysis of the systemic lupus erythematosus needs questionnaire (SLENQ). Qual Life Res 16, 461–466 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-006-9137-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-006-9137-5

Keywords

Navigation