Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Understanding IT professionals’ knowledge sharing intention through KMS: a social exchange perspective

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Knowledge sharing is the behavior of disseminating acquired knowledge to other members of an organization, and often presents major challenges, because some employees resist sharing their knowledge with others. In this paper, we investigate the knowledge sharing behavioral intention based on social exchange theory (SET). SET emphasizes non-material exchange, and people share their knowledge by weighing the potential benefits and risks of social relationships. The research presented in this study includes various constructs based on SET and social cognitive theory. This study examines the role of social exchange factors (perceived organizational support, organizational trust and reciprocal relationship expectancy) in explaining IT professionals’ knowledge sharing intentions through KMS. Based on a survey of 251 IT professionals in STSP, this study applies structural equation modeling to verify the research model. The results showed that trust, self-efficacy and reciprocal relationship expectancy are significantly associated with knowledge sharing through KMS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams L.C., Cross R., Lesser E., Levin D.Z.: Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks. Acad. Manag. Executive 17(4), 64–77 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I., Fishbein M.: Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Alavi M., Leidner D.E.: Review: knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Q. 25(1), 107–136 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aryee S., Budhwar P.S., Chen Z.X.: Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: test of a social exchange model. J. Organ. Behav. 23(3), 267–285 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asgari A., Silong A.D., Ahmad A., Samah B.A.: The relationship between transformational leadership behaviors, organizational justice, leader-member exchange, perceived organizational support, trust in management and organizational citizenship behaviors. Eur. J. Sci. Res. 23(2), 227–242 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Assimakopoulos D., Yan J.: Sources of knowledge acquisition for Chinese software engineers. R&D Manag. 36(1), 97–106 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A.: Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Worth Publishers, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell S.J., Menguc B., Stefani S.L.: When customers disappoint: a model of relational internal marketing and customer complaints. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 32(2), 112–126 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock G.W., Kim Y.G.: Breaking the myths of rewards: an exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing. Inf. Resour. Manag. J. 15(2), 14–21 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock G.W., Zmud R.W., Kim Y.G., Lee J.N.: Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Q. 29(1), 87–111 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne M., Cudeck R.: Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociol. Methods Res. 21(2), 230–258 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera A., Cabrera E.F.: Knowledge-sharing dilemmas. Organ. Stud. 23(5), 687–710 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera E.F., Cabrera A.: Fostering knowledge sharing through people management practices. Int. J. Hum. Resource Manag. 16(5), 720–735 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu C.M., Hsu M.H., Wang E.T.G.: Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: an integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Syst. 42(3), 1872–1888 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Compeau D., Higgins C.A.: Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Q. 19(2), 189–211 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Compeau D., Higgins C.A., Huff S.: Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: a longitudinal study. MIS Q. 23(2), 145–158 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constant D., Kiesler S., Sproull L.: What is mine is ours, or is it. Inf. Syst. Res. 5(4), 400–422 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano R., Mitchell M.S.: Social exchange theory: an interdisciplinary review. J. Manag. 31(6), 874–900 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalkir K.: Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice. Butterworth Heinemann, Burlington (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger R., Stinglhamber F., Vandenberghe C., Sucharski I., Rhoades L.: Perceived supervisor support: contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. J. Appl. Psychol. 87(3), 565–573 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etezadi-Amoli J., Farhoomand A.F.: A structural model of end user computing satisfaction and user performance. Inf. Manag. 30(2), 65–73 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gefen D., Karahanna E., Straub D.W.: Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model. MIS Q. 27(1), 51–90 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair J.F., Black W.C., Babin B.J., Anderson R.E.: Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayduk L.A.: Structural equation modeling with LISREL: essentials and advances. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 13(1), 107–112 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hekman D., Bigley G., Steensma H., Hereford J.: Combined effects of organizational and professional identification on the reciprocity dynamic for professional employees. Acad. Manag. J. 52(3), 506–526 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu M.H., Ju T.L., Yen C.H., Chang C.M.: Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: the relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 65(2), 153–169 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kankanhalli A., Tan B.C.Y., Wei K.K.: Contributing knowledge to electronic repositories: an empirical investigation. MIS Q. 29(1), 113–143 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • King W.R., Marks P.V.: Motivating knowledge sharing through a knowledge management system. Omega 36(1), 131–146 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin D.Z., Cross R.: The strength of weak ties you can trust: the mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Manag. Sci. 5(11), 1477–1490 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin H.F.: Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge sharing intentions. J. Inf. Sci. 33(2), 135–149 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin T.C., Huang C.C.: Understanding knowledge management system usage antecedents: an integration of social cognitive theory and task technology fit. Inf. Manag. 45(6), 410–417 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch P.D., Eisenberger R., Armeli S.: Perceived organizational support: inferior versus superior performance by wary employees. J. Appl. Psychol. 84(4), 467–483 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooradian T., Renzl B., Matzler K.: Who trusts? personality, trust and knowledge sharing. Manag. Learn. 37(4), 523–540 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorman R.H., Blakely G.L., Niehoff B.P.: Does perceived organizational support mediate the relationship between procedural justice and organizational citizenship behavior?. Acad. Manag. J. 41(3), 351–357 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I.A., Takeuchi H.A.: The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford university, Oxford (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff P.M., Organ D.W.: Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. J. Manag. 12(4), 531–544 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall M., Cropanzano R., Bormann C., Birjulin A.: Organizational politics and organizational support as predictors of work attitudes, job performance, and organizational citizenship behavior. J. Organ. Behav. 20(2), 159–174 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Settoon R.P., Bennett N., Liden R.C.: Social exchange in organizations: perceived organizational support, leader-member exchange, and employee reciprocity. J. Appl. Psychol. 81(3), 219–227 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone R.W., Bailey J.J.: Team conflict self-efficacy and outcome expectancy of business students. J. Educ. Bus. 82(5), 258–266 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone R.W., Henry J.W.: The roles of computer self-efficacy and outcome expectancy in Influencing the computer end-user’s organizational commitment. J. End User Comput. 15(1), 38–53 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straub D.W.: Validating instruments in MIS research. MIS Q. 13(2), 147–169 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullman J., Bentler P.: Structural Equation Modeling. Handbook of Data Analysis. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasko M.M., Faraj S.: Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Q. 29(1), 35–57 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Widen-Wulff G., Ginman M.: Explaining knowledge sharing in organizations through the dimensions of social capital. J. Inf. Sci. 30(5), 448–458 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu I.L., Chen J.L.: An extension of trust and TAM model with TPB in the initial adoption of on-line tax: an empirical study. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 62(6), 784–808 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nai-Chang Cheng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsai, MT., Chang, HC., Cheng, NC. et al. Understanding IT professionals’ knowledge sharing intention through KMS: a social exchange perspective. Qual Quant 47, 2739–2753 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9685-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9685-4

Keywords

Navigation