Skip to main content
Log in

An approach to the R&D value based upon real option method

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper aims to build up feasible models based upon the real option method (ROM) to assess R&D. In this paper we built eight models integrating with three conditions to assimilate the real situation an R&D project may encounter. We utilized both numerical and statistical illustration based upon an empirical case to exhibit the correctness of our models. We diverged our discussion into either expense or capital viewpoint to react with current accounting debate. The results shed us the light: our models in both expense and capital viewpoint can correctly asses R&D; the selected conditions play essential roles to influence the correctness of our models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almon A.: The distributed lag between capital appropriations and expenditures. Econometrica 33, 178–196 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber W., Fairfield P., Haggard J.: The effect of concern about reported income on discretionary spending: the case of research and development. Account. Rev. 66, 818–829 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaver W.H., Ryan S.: Biases and lags in book value and their effects on the ability of the book-to-market ratio to predicted book return on equity. J. Account. Res. 38, 127–148 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellalah M.: Valuation of futures and commodity options with information costs. J. Futures Mark. 19, 645–664 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellalah M.: On irreversibility, sunk costs and investment under incomplete information. In: Paxson, D.A. (eds) Real R&D Options, Butterworth Heinemann, Burlington (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Billings B.K., Morton R.M.: Book-to-market components, future security returns, and errors in expected earnings. J. Account. Res. 39, 197–219 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black F., Scholes M.: The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J. Political Econom. 81, 637–654 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bushee B.J.: The influence on institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. Account. Rev. 73, 305–333 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan L.K.C., Lankonishok J., Sougiannis T.: The stock market valuation of research and development expenditures. J. Finance 66, 2431–2457 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen W., Levin R.: Empirical studies of innovation and market structure. In: Schmalensee, R., Willig, R. (eds) Handbook of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, North Holland (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland T.E., Wetson J.F., Shastri K.: Financial Theory and Corporation Policy. Pearson Addison Wesley, Boston (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit A.K., Pindyck R.S.: Investment Under Uncertainty. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Evenson R., Kislev Y.: A stochastic model of applied research. J. Political Econ. 84, 265–281 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama E.F., French K.R.: Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. J. Financial Econ. 33, 3–55 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham J., Harvey C.: The theory and practice of corporate finance: evidence from the field. J. Financial Econ. 60, 187–243 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green J.P., Stark A.W., Thomas H.M.: UK evidence of market valuation of research and development expenditures. J. Bus. Account. 23, 191–216 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschey M., Weygandt J.: Amortization policy for advertising and research and development expenditures. J. Account. Res. 23, 326–335 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho Y.K., Xu Z.Y., Yap C.M.: R&D investment and systematic risk. Account. Finance 44, 393–418 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lev B., Sougiannis T.: The capitalization, amortization, and value relevance of R&D. J. Account. 21, 107–138 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luehrman T.A.: Strategy as a portfolio of real options. Harvard Bus. Rev. 76, 89–99 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelker G.N., Rhee S.G.: The impact of degrees of operating and financial leverage on systematic risk of common stock. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 19, 45–58 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald R., Siegel D.: The value of waiting to invest. Q. J. Econ. 99, 707–727 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mear R., Firth M.: Risk perceptions of financial analysis and the use of market and accounting data. Account. Bus. Res. 18, 335–340 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton R.C.: A simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information. J. Finance 42, 483–510 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowery D.: The relationship between intrafirm and contractual form of industrial research in American manufacturing, 1900–1940. Explor. Econ. Hist. 20, 351–374 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perlitz M., Peske T., Schrank R.: Real options valuation: the new frontier in R&D project evaluation. R&D Manag. 29, 255–269 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross S.A., Westerfield R.W., Jaffe J.: Corporate Finance. McGraw-Hill, Boston (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith C.W., Watts R.L.: The investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend and compensation policies. J. Financial Econ. 32, 263–292 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sougiannis T.: The accounting based valuation of corporate R&D. Account. Rev. 69, 44–68 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundaram A.K., John T.A., John K.: An empirical analysis of strategic competition and firm values, the case of R&D competition. J. Financial Econ. 40, 459–486 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titman S., Wessels R.: The determinant of capital structure choice. J. Finance 43, 1–19 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu Wen Lan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lo, K.H., Lan, Y.W. An approach to the R&D value based upon real option method. Qual Quant 44, 509–527 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-008-9208-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-008-9208-5

Keywords

Navigation