Skip to main content
Log in

Economic freedom and entrepreneurial activity: Some cross-country evidence

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While much attention has been devoted to analyzing how the institutional framework and entrepreneurship impact growth, how economic policy and institutional design affect entrepreneurship appears to be much less analyzed. We try to explain cross-country differences in the level of entrepreneurship by differences in economic policy and institutional design. Specifically, we use the Economic Freedom Index from the Fraser Institute to ask which elements of economic policy making and the institutional framework are conducive to the supply of entrepreneurship, measured by data on entrepreneurship from the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. We find that the size of government is negatively correlated and sound money is positively correlated with entrepreneurial activity. Other measures of economic freedom are not significantly correlated with entrepreneurship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992). A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60, 323–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Thurik, R. (2001). Linking entrepreneurship to growth. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, OECD Publishing.

  • Audretsch, D. B., Thurik, R., Verheul, I., & Wennekers, S. (2002). Entrepreneurship: Determinants and policy in a European–US comparison. Boston: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross-section of countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 407–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barzel, Y. (2005). A theory of the state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. (1968). Entrepreneurship in economic theory. American Economic Review, 58, 64–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. (1990). Entrepreneurship: productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 893–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. (1993). Entrepreneurship, management, and the structure of payoffs. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berggren, N. (2003). The benefits of economic freedom: a survey. Independent Review, 8, 193–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J. (1982). Directly-unproductive profit-seeking (DUP) activities. Journal of Political Economy, 90, 988–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, M., & Henrekson, M. (2005). Is neoclassical economics still entrepreneurless? Kyklos, 58, 353–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, D. G. (2000). Self-employment in OECD countries. Labour Economics, 7, 471–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, D. (1987). A time-series analysis of self-employment in the United States. Journal of Political Economy, 95, 445–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunetti, A., Kisunko, G., & Weder, G. (1997). Institutional obstacles to doing business: region-by-region results from a worldwide survey of the private sector. Background paper for World Development Report 1997, Policy Research Working Paper 1759, Washington D.C.: World Bank.

  • Cantillon, R. (1755). In H. Higgs (Ed.), Essai sur la nature de commerce en géneral. London: Macmillan, 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, F., & Lundström, S. (2002). Economic freedom and growth: decomposing the effects. Public Choice, 112, 335–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Haan, J., Lundström, S., & Sturm, J.-E. (2006). Market-oriented institutions and policies and economic growth: a critical survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 20, 157–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H. (1982). Barriers to entry. American Economic Review, 72, 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Soto, H. (2003). The mystery of capital: Why capitalism triumphs in the West and Fails everywhere else. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. (1996). The making of economic policy: A transaction cost perspective. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekelund, R. B., & Hébert, R. F. (1990). A history of economic thought and method (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falvey, R., Foster, D., & Greenaway, R. (2004). Intellectual property rights and economic growth. GEP Research Paper, Nottingham University, Nottingham.

  • Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2005). Entrepreneurship and the economic theory of the firm: Any gains from trade? In R. Agarwal, S. A. Alvarez & O. Sorenson (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship: Disciplinary perspectives. Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1977). Nobel lecture: inflation and unemployment. Journal of Political Economy, 85, 451–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E., La Porta, R., Lopez de Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2004). Do institutions cause growth? Journal of Economic Growth, 9, 271–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grilo, I., & Thurik, R. (2004). Determinants of entrepreneurship in Europe. Discussion Paper no. 3004, Max Planck Institute for Research Into Economic Systems, Group Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy.

  • Grubel, H. G. (1998). Economic freedom and human welfare: some empirical findings. Cato Journal, 18, 287–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwartney, J., & Lawson, R. (2005). Economic freedom of the world 2005. Downloadable from http://www.freetheworld.com/download.html.

  • Gwartney, J., Lawson, R., & Holcombe, R. (1999). Economic freedom and the environment for economic growth. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 155, 643–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Haan, J., & Sturm, J.-E. (2000). On the relationship between economic freedom and economic growth. European Journal of Political Economy, 16, 215–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1946). The meaning of competition. In Individualism and economic order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1968). Competition as a discovery procedure. In New studies in economics, politics, philosophy, and the history of ideas. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrekson, M. (2005). Entrepreneurship: a weak link in the welfare state? Industrial and Corporate Change, 14, 437–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heston, A., Summers, R., & Aten, B. (2002). Penn world tables, mark 6.1. Center for International Comparisons (CICUP), University of Pennsylvania.

  • Huber, P. J. (1964). Robust estimation of a location parameter. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 35, 73–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. (1980). The prime mover of progress. In I. Kirzner & A. Seldon (Eds.), The entrepreneur in capitalism and socialism. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. (1985). Discovery and the capitalist process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. (1997). Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 60–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. (1921). Risk, uncertainity, and profit. Reprint 1965. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

  • Kortum, S., & Lerner, J. (2000). Assessing the contribution of venture capital to innovation. Rand Journal of Economics, 31, 674–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreft, S. F., & Sobel, R. S. (2005). Public policy, entrepreneurship, and economic freedom. Cato Journal, 25, 595–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazear, E. M. (2002). Entrepreneurship. NBER working paper 9109.

  • Lindbeck, A., Nyberg, S., & Weibull, J. (1999). Social norms and economic incentives in the welfare state. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Méon, P.-G., & Weill, L. (2006). Does better governance foster efficiency? An aggregate frontier analysis. Economics of Governance, 6, 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Mises, L. (1949). Human action. London: William Hodge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokyr, J. (2006). Long-term economic growth and the history of technology. In P. Aghion & S. Durlauf (Eds.), Handbook of economic growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C., Summerhill, W. R., & Weingast, B. (2000). Order, disorder and economic change: Latin America vs. North America. In B. B. de Mesquita & H. Root (Eds.), Governing for prosperity. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1982). The rise and decline of nations: Economic growth, stagflation, and social rigidities. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts, M. (1987). The new industrial economics: An introduction to modern theories of the firm. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 71–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N. (1992). Economic experiments. Industrial and Corporate Change, 1, 181–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N., & Birdzell, L. (1986). How the West grew rich. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, A., & Rath, J. (2002). Unravelling the rag trade: Immigrant entrepreneurship in seven world cities. Oxford: Berg Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. D., & Warner, A. M. (1997). Fundamental sources of long-run growth. American Economic Review, 87, 184–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salerno, J. T. (1993). Mises and Hayek dehomogenized. Review of Austrian Economics, 6, 113–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1911/1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. London: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segerstrom, P. S., Anant, T. C. A., & Dinopoulos, E. (1990). A Schumpeterian model of the product life cycle. American Economic Review, 80, 1077–1091.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinn, H.-W. (1995). A theory of the welfare state. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 97, 495–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinn, H.-W. (1997). The selection principle and market failure in systems competition. Journal of Public Economics, 66, 247–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturm, J.-E., Leertouwer, E., & de Haan, J. (2002). Which economic freedoms contribute to growth? A comment. Kyklos 55, 403–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temple, J. (1999). The new growth evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 37, 112–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNU. (2006). World income inequality database, v2.0. Helsinki: United Nations University-World Institute for Development Economics Research.

  • Wacziarg, R. (2001). Measuring the dynamic gains from trade. World Bank Economic Review, 15, 393–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wennekers, S., & Thurik, R. (1999). Linking entrepreneurship and economic growth. Small Business Economics, 13, 27–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2006). World development indicators. Online database. Washington, DC: the World Bank.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Bjørnskov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bjørnskov, C., Foss, N.J. Economic freedom and entrepreneurial activity: Some cross-country evidence. Public Choice 134, 307–328 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-007-9229-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-007-9229-y

Keywords

JEL

Navigation