Abstract
Developing and implementing consistent methodology for suicide assessment and intervention is challenging, particularly in a large community hospital which provides both inpatient care and a wide range of ambulatory and community based mental health programs. Patients, families, staff, and ongoing evaluation contributed to the development of an initiative to determine what is best practice and in effecting changes in clinical and organizational practices. The Suicide Assessment project resulted in improved clinical outcomes for patients and clients. Staff report that they feel more supported in probing for suicidal ideation and have the skills required to effectively intervene with the ‘suicidal’ patient/client. This project advanced our knowledge of suicide assessment and risk management and provided new insights to assist professionals in the aftermath of a client’s suicide when, as Valente describes, clinicians report ‘feeling overwhelmed with feelings of guilt, self-blame, and responsibility (Valente S: Journal of Psychosocial Nursing 40:7 22-23, 2002).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Valente S: Overcoming barriers to suicide risk management. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing 40:(7):22–23, 2002.
International Association for Suicide Prevention. 2006.
Bongar B, Berman AL, Maris RW, et al.: Risk Management with Suicidal Clients. Guildford Press, New York, 1998.
Asnis GM, Harkery RG, Friedman JM, et al: The drug-free period: A methodological issue. Biological Psychology, 1990.
World Health Organization Suicide Prevention: Saving Lives, Restoring Hope, Press Release Sept 8, 2004.
Packman WL, Marlitt R, Bongar B, et al.: A comprehensive and concise assessment of suicide risk. Behavioural Sciences and the Law 22:667–680, 2004.
Lamberg L: Psychiatric emergencies call for comprehensive assessment and treatment. Journal of the American Medical Association 288(6):686–687, 2002.
Baker R, Norton P: The CQI Network Advancing Health Care System Improvement: Achieving Best Practice Through Rapid Cycle Methodology. Hosted by Trillium Health Centre, October 2002.
National Suicide Prevention Strategy for England, Department of Health, 2002.
Ontario Mental Health Act: Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 1998.
Ontario Personal Health Information Protection Act, 2004.
Packman WL, Marlitt R, Bongar B, et al.: A comprehensive and concise assessment of suicide risk. Behavioural Sciences and the Law 22:667–680, 2004.
Range LM, Knott EC: Twenty suicide assessment instruments: evaluation and recommendations. Death Studies 21:1 25–58, 1997.
Hall K, Suicide prevention topic 3: What is the relative efficacy of different suicide assessment tools regardless of the restrictions on who can administer these? New Zealand Health Technology Assessment, 2002.
Brown, Gregory K: A review of Suicide Assessment Measures for Intervention Research with Adults and Older Adults, Monograph University of Pennsylvania, date unknown.
Maris R, Berman A, Maltsberger J, et al.: Assessment and Prediction of Suicide. The Guilford Press, New York, 1992.
Cutcliffe JR, Barker P: The nurses’ global assessment of suicide risk (NASGR): developing a tool for clinical practice. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 11:393–400, 2004.
Fiske H: Reasons for Living workshop. The Hincks-Dellcrest Centre, Toronto, 2002.
Hirschfeld RM, Russell JM: Assessment and treatment of suicidal patients. New England Journal of Medicine 337:910–913, 1997.
Malone KM, Oquendo MA, Haas GL, et al.: Protective factors against suicidal acts in major depression: reasons for living. American Journal of Psychiatry 157:1084–1088, 2000.
Miller J: A comparison of suicidal thinking and reasons for living among younger and older adults. Death Studies 25:357–365, 2001.
Jacobs D: The Harvard Medical School Guide to Suicide Assessment and Intervention. Jossey-Bass Books, San Francisco, 1999.
Waern M, Rubenwoitz E, Runeson B, et al.: Burden of illness and suicide in elderly people: case-control study. British Medical Journal 324:1355–1357, 2002.
Jacobs D: The Harvard Medical School Guide to Suicide Assessment and Intervention. Jossey-Bass Books, San Francisco, 1999.
Fiske H: Reasons for LIVING Workshop. The Hincks-Dellcrest Centre, Toronto, 2002.
Ramsay RF, Tanney BL, Lang WA, et al,: Suicide Intervention Handbook, Calgary AB, Living Works Education Inc., 1999.
Guttormsen T, Høifødt T, Silvola K, et al.: Applied suicide intervention skills training–an evaluation. Tidsskr Nor Lœgeforen 123:2284–6, 2003.
Simon R: The suicide prevention contract: clinical, legal, and risk management issues. Journal of American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 27:445–50, 1999.
Weiss A: The no-suicide contract: possibilities and pitfalls. American Journal of Psychotherapy 55:414–420, 2001.
Drew BL: Self-harm behaviour and no-suicide contracting in psychiatric inpatient settings. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing 15:99–106, 2001.
Range LM, Knott EC: Twenty suicide assessment instruments: evaluation and recommendations. Death Studies 21:25–58, 1997.
Farrow TL: Owning their expertise: why nurses use ‘no-suicide contracts’ rather than their own assessments. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing 11:214–19, 2002.
Zemke R, Zemke S: 30 Things We Know for Sure About Adult Learning. Training. 57–61 (July 1988).
Dlugacz Y, Resifo A, Scanlon K, et al.: Patient safety: safety strategies to prevent suicide in multiple health care environments. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety 29:267–278, 2003.
Ontario Quality of Care Information Protection Act, 2004.
Registered Nurses Association of Ontario: Establishing Therapeutic Relationships, Toronto, 2002.
Duffy D, Ryan T, Purdy R: Preventing Suicide: A Toolkit for Mental Health Services, National Institute for Mental Health in England, 2003.
Lyons C, Price P, Embling S, et al.: Suicide risk assessment: a review of procedures. Accident & Emergency Nursing 8:178–186, 2000.
Dlugacz Y, Resifo A, Scanlon K, et al.: Patient safety: safety strategies to prevent suicide in multiple health care environments. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety 29:267–278, 2003.
Oravecz R, Moore M: Recognition of suicide risk according to the characteristics of the suicide process. Death Studies 30:269–279, 2006.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McAuliffe, N., Perry, L. Making it Safer: A Health Centre’s Strategy for Suicide Prevention. Psychiatr Q 78, 295–307 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-007-9047-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-007-9047-x