Skip to main content
Log in

Combining target sampling with within field route-optimization to optimise on field yield estimation in viticulture

  • Published:
Precision Agriculture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes a new approach for yield sampling in viticulture. It combines approaches based on auxiliary information and path optimization to offer more consistent sampling strategies, integrating statistical approaches with computer methods. To achieve this, groups of potential sampling points, comparable according to their auxiliary data values are created. Then, an optimal path is constituted that passes through one point of each group of potential sampling points and minimizes the route distance. This part is performed using constraint programming, a programming paradigm offering tools to deal efficiently with combinatorial problems. The paper presents the formalization of the problem, as well as the tests performed on nine real fields were high resolution NDVI data and medium resolution yield data were available. In addition, tests on simulated data were performed to examine the sensitivity of the approach to field data characteristics such as the correlation between auxiliary data and yield, the spatial auto-correlation of the data among others. The approach does not alter much the results when compared to conventional approaches but greatly reduces sampling time. Results show that, for a given amount of time, combining model sampling and path optimization can give estimation error up to 30% lower for a given amount of time compared to previous methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acevedo-Opazo, C., Tisseyre, B., Guillaume, S., & Ojeda, H. (2008). The potential of high spatial resolution information to define within-vineyard zones related to vine water status. Precision Agriculture, 9, 285–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnó, J., Martínez-Casasnovas, J. A., Uribeetxebarria, A., & Rosell-Polo, J. R. (2017). Comparing efficiency of different sampling schemes to estimate yield and quality parameters in fruit orchards. Advances in Animal Biosciences, 8(2), 471–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bramley, R. G. V., & Hamilton, R. P. (2004). Understanding variability in winegrape production systems. 1. Within vineyard variation in yield over several vintages. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 10, 32–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bramley, R. G. V., Ouzman, J., Trought, M. C. T., Neal, S. M., & Bennett, J. S. (2019). Spatio-temporal variability in vine vigour and yield in a Marlborough Sauvignon Blanc vineyard. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 25(4), 430–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briot, N., Bessiere, C., Tisseyre, B. & Vismara, P. (2015). Integration of Operational Constraints to Optimize Differential Harvest in Viticulture. In Proceed. 10th European conference on precision agriculture (ECPA 2015), pp. 487–494.

  • Carrillo, E., Matese, A., Rousseau, J., & Tisseyre, B. (2016). Use of multi-spectral airborne imagery to improve yield sampling in viticulture. Precision Agriculture, 17(1), 74–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cristofolini, F., & Gottardini, E. (2000). Concentration of airborne pollen of Vitisvinifera L. and yield forecast: A case study at S.Michele all’Adige, Trento, Italy. Aerobiologia, 16(1), 125–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clingeleffer, P. R., Martin, S., Krstic, M., & Dunn, G. M. (2001). Crop development, crop estimation and crop control to secure quality and production of major wine grape varieties. A national approach: Final report to grape and wine research & development corporation. Adelaide: Grape and Wine Research & Development Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, G. M., & Martin, S. R. (2000). Spatial and temporal variation in vineyard yields. In Proceedings of the fifth international symposium on cool climate viticulture & oenology. Precision management workshop (pp. 1–4). Romsey: Cope Williams Winery.

  • Hall, A., Lamb, D. W., Holzapfel, B. P., & Louis, J. P. (2010). Within-season temporal variation in correlations between vineyard canopy and winegrape composition and yield. Precision Agriculture, 12(1), 103–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahsler, M., & Hornik, K. (2007). TSP—infrastructure for the traveling salesperson problem. Journal of Statistical Software, 23(2), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krstic, M. P., Welsh, M. A., & Clingeleffe, P. R. (1998). Variation in chardonnay yield components between vineyards in a warm irrigated region. In R. J. Blair, A. N. Sas, P. F. Hayes, & P. B. Hoj (Eds.), Precision agriculture (pp. 269–270). Urrbrae, SA, Sydney Australia: AWRI.

  • Li, T., Hao, X., Kang, S., & Leng, D. (2017). Spatial variation of winegrape yield and berry composition and their relationships to spatiotemporal distribution of soil water content. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 68(3), 369–377.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oger, B., Vismara, P., & Tisseyre, B. (2015). Combining target sampling with route-optimization to optimise yield estimation in viticulture. In proceed. 12th European conference on precision agriculture (ECPA 2019), pp. 487–494.

  • Prud’homme, C., Fages, J. G., & Lorca, X. (2014). Choco documentation. TASC, INRIA Rennes, LINA CNRS UMR 6241, COSLING S.A.S, https://perso.ensta-paris.fr/~diam/jorlab/online/choco/user_guide-3.3.0.pdf.

  • Rouse, J. W. Jr., Haas, R. H., Schell, J. A., & Deering, D. W. (1973). Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS. In S. C. Freden, E. P. Mercanti, & M. A. Becker (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third ERTS Symposium, NASA SP-351 1, pp. 309–317

  • Taylor J., Tisseyre B., Bramley R. & Reid A. (2005). A comparison of the spatial variability of vineyard yield in European and Australian production systems. In Proceed. 5th European conference on precision agriculture (ECPA 2005), pp. 907–914.

  • Tisseyre, B., Leroux, C., Pichon, L., Geraudie, V., & Sari, T. (2018). How to define the optimal grid size to map high resolution spatial data? Precision Agriculture, 19(5), 957–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uribeetxebarria, A., Martínez-Casasnovas, J. A., Tisseyre, B., Guillaume, S., Escolà, A., Rosell-Polo, J. R., et al. (2019). Assessing ranked set sampling and ancillary data to improve fruit load estimates in peach orchards. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 164, 104931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vismara, P. & Briot, N. (2018). A circuit constraint for multiple tours problems. In proceed. 24th international conference on principles and practice of constraint programming (CP 2018). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. (Vol. 11008, pp. 389–402).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the French National Research Agency under the Investments for the Future Program, referred as ANR-16-CONV-0004 (#Digitag).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Oger.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oger, B., Vismara, P. & Tisseyre, B. Combining target sampling with within field route-optimization to optimise on field yield estimation in viticulture. Precision Agric 22, 432–451 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-020-09744-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-020-09744-0

Keywords

Navigation