Skip to main content
Log in

Suitability of a laser rangefinder to characterize winter wheat

  • Published:
Precision Agriculture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, laser rangefinder sensors have been introduced to the practice and research of agricultural engineering. In research, laser rangefinders have been investigated in horticulture and agriculture. For vehicle-based determination of crop biomass, commercially available laser rangefinders have been analysed and tested to measure aboveground biomass in oilseed rape, winter rye, winter wheat, oats and grassland. Resulting from limited measuring range and fixed beam types, the laser rangefinder models that were investigated only partially met the specific demands for agricultural field and crop conditions. Therefore, a new laser rangefinder scanner (ibeo-ALASCA XT) was chosen. This sensor was specifically developed for driver assistance and autonomous guiding of road vehicles. The scanner was tested in 2008 focusing on the measurement of crop stand parameters in winter wheat under field conditions. The sensor achieved good results with reproducible measurements. Measuring from a stationary vehicle, the standard deviation for the measurements of crop height to characterise the crop stand was less than 3 mm in low, medium, and high biomass areas. The ground speed of the vehicle, ranging from 6 to 24 km h−1, did not significantly influence the readings. For measurements in front of tractors and self-propelled machines (field sprayers, combines and forage harvesters), the sensor has to scan the crop stands at different inclination angles. It was shown that the inclination angle of the laser beam, which varied from 10° to 80°, significantly influenced the readings. Higher inclination angles resulted in apparent increased heights of the crop stand. For the functional relationship between reflection height levels (95th, 75th, 50th and 25th percentiles, and mean values) and crop biomass density, the coefficient of determination (R2) was greater than 0.9.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arno, J., Valles, J. M., Escola, A., Sanz, R., Palacin, R., & Rosell, J. R. (2009). Use of a ground-based LIDAR scanner to measure leaf area and canopy structure variability of grapevines. In E. J. van Henten, D. Goense, & C. Lokhorst (Eds.), Precision agriculture ‘09: Proceedings of the 7th European conference on precision agriculture (pp. 177–184). Wageningen, NL: Wageningen Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlert, D., & Dammer, K. H. (2006). Wide-scale testing of the Crop-Meter for site-specific farming. Precision Agriculture, 7, 101–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehlert, D., Adamek, R., & Horn, H. J. (2007). Assessment of laser rangefinder principles for measuring crop biomass. In J. V. Stafford (Ed.), Precision agriculture ′07: Proceedings of the 6th European conference on precision agriculture (pp. 317–324). Wageningen, NL: Wageningen Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlert, D., Adamek, R., & Horn, H.J. (2009). Vehicle Based Laser Range Finding in Crops. Sensors, 9, 3679–3694; doi:10.3390/s90503679;http://www.mdpi.com/journal/sensors.

  • Ehsani, R., & Lang, L. (2002). A sensor for rapid estimation of plant biomass. In P. C. Robert (Ed.), Proceedings of the 6th International conference on precision agriculture (pp. 950–957). Madison, WI, USA: ASA/CSSA/SSSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heege, H. J., Reusch, S., & Thiessen, E. (2004). Systems for site specific on the go control of nitrogen top dressing during spreading. In D. J. Mulla (Ed.). Proceedings of the 7th international conference on precision agriculture. Minneapolis, USA: Regents University of Minnesota. CDROM.

  • Meyer, U. (1977). Growth stages of mono and dicotyledonous plants. Berlin: Blackwell Wissenschafts-Verlag, Wien ISBN 3-8263-3152-4.

  • Saeys, W., Lenaerts, B., Craessaerts, G., & De Baerdemaeker, J. (2009). Estimation of the crop density of small grains using LiDAR sensors. Biosystems Engineering, 102, 22–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanz, R., Palacín, J., Sisó, J. M., Ribes-Dasi, M., Masip, J., Arnó, J., Liorens, J., Vallés, J.M., & Rossell, J. R. (2004). Advances in the measurement of structural characteristics of plants with a LIDAR scanner. In: Proceedings of EurAgEng conference, Leuven, Belgium, CDROM: Paper 277.

  • Thösink, G., Preckwinkel, J., Linz, A., Ruckelshausen, A., & Marquering, J. (2004). Optoelektronisches Sensorsystem zur Messung der Pflanzenbestandesdichte. [Optoelectronic sensor system for crop density measurement]. Landtechnik, 59(2), 78–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tumbo, S. D., Salyani, M., Whitney, J. D., Wheaton, T. A., & Miller, W. M. (2002). Investigation of laser and ultrasonic ranging sensors for measurements of citrus canopy volume. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 18, 367–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walklate, P., Cross, J., Richardson, G., Murray, R., & Baker, D. (2002). Comparison of different spray volume deposition models using Lidar measurements of apple orchards. Biosystems Engineering, 82, 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank Antje Giebel for her support in data analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Detlef Ehlert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ehlert, D., Heisig, M. & Adamek, R. Suitability of a laser rangefinder to characterize winter wheat. Precision Agric 11, 650–663 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-010-9191-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-010-9191-4

Keywords

Navigation