Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using propensity score matching technique to address self-selection in transit-oriented development (TOD) areas

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many studies have investigated the effects of transit-oriented development (TOD) on travel behavior, especially on transit ridership. However, most studies do not explicitly and effectively address the issue of residential self-selection in their analyses. The aim of this paper is to use cross-sectional data and propensity score matching (PSM) technique to quantify the contribution of residential self-selection to the analysis of mode choice in TOD areas across the metropolitan areas of Washington, D.C. and Baltimore, MD. The authors use PSM because it does not make substantive assumptions to the structure of the self-selection problem (e.g., explicit modeling of outcome and treatment). The results of PSM indicate that, even though the self-selection effect is considerable in the analysis of mode choice in TOD areas (about 7.65% in Washington, D.C. and 5.05% in Baltimore), living in TOD still has a significant impact on encouraging transit and other active modes of transportation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Source: Econometrics Academy

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The entropy formula has been widely used in several land-use and transportation related articles (Nasri and Zhang 2014; Zhang et al. 2012): \(Entropy\, = \, - \,\sum\nolimits_{j} {\frac{{P_{j} ln\left( {P_{j} } \right)}}{ln\left( J \right)}}\).

References

  • Arrington, G.B., Cervero, R.: TCRP Report 128: Effects of TOD on Housing, Parking, and Travel, p. 3. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, P.C.: A comparison of 12 algorithms for matching on the propensity score. Stat. Med. 33(6), 1057–1069 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagley, M.N., Mokhtarian, P.L.: The impact of residential neighborhood type on travel behavior: a structural equations modeling approach. Ann. Reg. Sci. 36(2), 279–297 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, C.R., Guo, J.Y.: A comprehensive analysis of built environment characteristics on household residential choice and auto ownership levels. Transp. Res. Part. B Methodol. 41(5), 506–526 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Boarnet, M.G., Anderson, C.L., Day, K., McMillan, T., Alfonzo, M.: Evaluation of the California Safe Routes to School legislation: urban form changes and children’s active transportation to school. Am. J. Prev. Med. 28(2), 134–140 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Boer, R., Zheng, Y., Overton, A., Ridgeway, G.K., Cohen, D.A.: Neighborhood design and walking trips in ten US metropolitan areas. Am. J. Prev. Med. 32(4), 298–304 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Calthorpe, P.: The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream. Princeton Architectural Press, Princeton (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, X.J.: Exploring causal effects of neighborhood type on walking behavior using stratification on the propensity score. Environ. Plan. A 42(2), 487–504 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, X.J.: 10 The effects of neighbourhood type and self-selection on driving: a case study of Northern California. In: International Handbook on Transport and Development, vol. 149 (2015)

  • Cao, X., Fan, Y.: Exploring the influences of density on travel behavior using propensity score matching. Environ. Plan B Plan. Des. 39(3), 459–470 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, X.J., Schoner, J.: The influence of light rail transit on transit use: an exploration of station area residents along the Hiawatha line in Minneapolis. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 59, 134–143 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, X., Handy, S.L., Mokhtarian, P.L.: The influences of the built environment and residential self-selection on pedestrian behavior: evidence from Austin, TX. Transportation 33(1), 1–20 (2006a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P.L., & Handy, S.L.: Impacts of the built environment and residential self-selection on nonwork travel: seemingly unrelated regression approach. In Transportation Research Board 85th Annual Meeting (No. 06-1595) (2006b)

  • Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P.L., Handy, S.L.: Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behaviour: a focus on empirical findings. Transp. Rev. 29(3), 359–395 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, X.J., Xu, Z., Fan, Y.: Exploring the connections among residential location, self-selection, and driving: propensity score matching with multiple treatments. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 44(10), 797–805 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervero, R.: Transit-based housing in California: evidence on ridership impacts. Transp. Policy 3, 174–183 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervero, R.: Transit-oriented development in the United States: experiences, challenges, and prospects, vol. 102, Transportation Research Board (2004)

  • Cervero, R.: Transit-oriented development’s ridership bonus: a product of self-selection and public policies. Environ. Plan. A 39(9), 2068–2085 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervero, R.: Effects of TOD on housing, parking, and travel. Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) Report 128 (2008)

  • Chatman, D.G.: How the built environment influences non-work travel: theoretical and empirical essays. Doctoral Dissertation: University of California, Los Angeles (2005)

  • Chatman, D.G.: Deconstructing development density: quality, quantity and price effects on household non-work travel. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 42(7), 1008–1030 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatman, D.G.: Does TOD need the T? On the importance of factors other than rail access. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 79(1), 17–31 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatman, D.G.: Estimating the effect of land use and transportation planning on travel patterns: three problems in controlling for residential self-selection. J. Transp. Land Use 7(3), 47–56 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, R., Cervero, R.: Travel and the built environment: a synthesis. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1780, 87–114 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, R., Cervero, R.: Travel and the built environment: a meta-analysis. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 76(3), 265–294 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Faghri, A., Venigalla, M.: Measuring travel behavior and transit trip generation characteristics of transit-oriented developments. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2397, 72–79 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, D.: Residential location and commute mode choice. Doctoral dissertation: University of Wales, Cardiff (2005)

  • Handy, S.L., Clifton, K.J.: Evaluating neighborhood accessibility: possibilities and practicalities. J. Transp. Stat. 4(2/3), 67–78 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, S., Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P.: Correlation or causality between the built environment and travel behavior? Evidence from Northern California. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 10(6), 427–444 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, S., Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P.L.: Self-selection in the relationship between the built environment and walking: empirical evidence from Northern California. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 72(1), 55–74 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickman, R., Bonilla, D., Givoni, M., Banister, D.: International Handbook on Transport and Development. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, X., Cao, X., Cao, J.: The association between transit access and auto ownership: evidence from Guangzhou, China. Transp. Plan. Technol. 39(3), 269–283 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M.: Micro-econometrics for Policy, Program and Treatment Effects. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, H.: Reasons for living in a transit-oriented development, and associated transit use. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 72(3), 357–366 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, H., Willson, R.W., Cervero, R.: A re-evaluation of travel behavior in California TODs. J. Archit. Plan. Res. 1, 247–263 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Meurs, H., Haaijer, R.: Spatial structure and mobility. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 6(6), 429–446 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokhtarian, P.L., Cao, X.: Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behavior: a focus on methodologies. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 42(3), 204–228 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokhtarian, P.L., van Herick, D.: Quantifying residential self-selection effects: a review of methods and findings from applications of propensity score and sample selection approaches. J. Transp. Land Use 9(1), 9–28 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Naess, P.: Tempest in a teapot: the exaggerated problem of transport-related residential self-selection as a source of error in empirical studies. J. Transp. Land Use 7(3), 57–79 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasri, A., Zhang, L.: The analysis of transit-oriented development (TOD) in Washington, DC and Baltimore metropolitan areas. Transp. Policy 32, 172–179 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, H., Boarnet, M., Houston, D., Spears, S., & Lee, J.: Changes in Transit Use and Service and Associated Changes in Driving Near a New Light Rail Transit Line (No. CA-MTI-1108) (2015)

  • Oakes, J.M., Johnson, P.J.: Propensity score matching for social epidemiology. Methods Soc. Epidemiol. 1, 370–393 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Parady, G., Takami, K., Harata, N.: Connection between built environment and travel behavior: propensity score approach under a continuous treatment regime. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2453, 137–144 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, K., Ewing, R., Scheer, B.C., & Khan, S.S.A.: Travel behavior in TODs versus non-TODs: using cluster analysis and propensity score matching. Presented at the Transportation Research Board 96th Annual meeting (No. 17-00899) (2017)

  • Parker, T. et al.: Statewide Transit-Oriented Development Study: Factors for Success in California (Sacramento: California, Department of Transportation, 2002)

  • Peikes, D.N., Moreno, L., Orzol, S.M.: Propensity score matching: a note of caution for evaluators of social programs. Am. Stat. 62(3), 222–231 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, P.R., Rubin, D.B.: The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1), 41–55 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheiner, J., Holz-Rau, C.: Travel mode choice: affected by objective or subjective determinants? Transportation 34(4), 487–511 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shatu, F.M., Kamruzzaman, M.: Investigating the link between transit-oriented development and sustainable travel behavior in Brisbane: a case-control study. J. Sustain. Dev. 7(4), 61–70 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, Q., Chen, P., Pan, H.: Factors affecting car ownership and mode choice in rail transit-supported suburbs of a large Chinese city. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 94, 31–44 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, M.R.: Does compact development make people drive less? J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 83(1), 7–18 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamir, K., Nasri, A., Baghaei, B., Mahapatra, S., Zhang, L.: Effects of transit-oriented development on trip generation, distribution, and mode share in Washington, DC, and Baltimore, Maryland. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2413, 45–53 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M.: Can transit-oriented development reduce peak-hour congestion? Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2174, 148–155 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., Hong, J.H., Nasri, A., Shen, Q.: How built environment affects travel behavior: a comparative analysis of the connections between land use and vehicle miles traveled in US cities. J. Transp. Land Use 5(3), 40–52 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is funded partially by the National Transportation Center at the University of Maryland. The authors would like to thank the MWCOG for providing household travel survey data for this analysis. Findings presented in this paper do not necessarily represent the official views of the sponsoring agency. The authors are solely responsible for all statements in the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, USA

    Arefeh Nasri, Carlos Carrion, Lei Zhang & Babak Baghaei

Authors
  1. Arefeh Nasri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carlos Carrion
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lei Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Babak Baghaei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arefeh Nasri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nasri, A., Carrion, C., Zhang, L. et al. Using propensity score matching technique to address self-selection in transit-oriented development (TOD) areas. Transportation 47, 359–371 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9887-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9887-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation