Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of methods for converting rhizotron root length measurements into estimates of root mass production per unit ground area

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rhizotrons provide valuable information about plant root production, but measurements are usually made in units of root length per unit surface area of observation window surface. These measurement units are not easily comparable to above-ground plant growth. To address this deficiency, several techniques have been developed to convert rhizotron measurement units into root mass production per unit ground area. In this study, four different conversion methods were applied to the same dataset of rhizotron measurements. This data was used to reveal the effect of conversion method upon estimates of the temporal variation in, and annual magnitude of, gross root mass production. Application of four different conversion methods resulted in gross root production estimates ranging between 2.1 and 11.4 t ha−1 year−1. Temporal variation in gross root mass production also varied between methods. All current methods for quantifying root production are likely to cause some disturbance and bias. Based upon a comparison of the sources of error present in each conversion method, we assess which methods are likely to produce the most reliable estimates of root biomass production per unit ground area, and propose additional measurements which could further improve accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bernier PY, Robitaille G (2004) A plane intersect method for estimating fine root productivity of trees from minirhizotron images. Plant Soil 265:165–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernier PY, Robitaille G, Rioux D (2005) Estimating the mass density of fine roots of trees for minirhizotron-based estimates of productivity. Can J For Res 35:1708–1713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckland ST, Campbell CD, Mackie-Dawson LA, Horgan GW, Duff EI (1993) A method for counting roots observed in minirhizotrons and theoretical conversion to root length density. Plant Soil 153:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavelier J (1989) Root biomass, production and the effect of fertilisation in two tropical rain forests. PhD Thesis University of Cambridge, U.K

  • Cavelier J, Wright SJ, Santamaria J (1999) Effects of irrigation on litterfall, fine root biomass and production in a deciduous lowland forest in Panama. Plant Soil 211:207–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cuevas E, Medina E (1988) Nutrient dynamics within Amazonian forests II: fine root growth, nutrient availability and leaf litter decomposition. Oecologia 76:222–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eissenstat DM, Wells CE, Yanai RD, Whitbeck JL (2000) Building roots in a changing environment: implications for root longevity. New Phytol 147:33–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA, Williams M, Lola da Costa A, Malhi Y, da Costa R F, Almeida S, Meir PW (2007) The response of an eastern Amazonian rain forest to drought stress: results and modelling analyses from a through-fall exclusion experiment. Glob. Change Biol in press

  • Green JJ, Dawson LA, Proctor J, Duff EI, Elston DA (2005) Fine root dynamics in a tropical rainforest is influenced by rainfall. Plant Soil 276:23–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Högberg P, Nordgren A, Buchmann N, Taylor AFS, Ekblad A, Högberg MN, Nyberg G, Ottosson-Löfvenius M, Read DJ (2001) Large-scale forest girdling shows that current photosynthesis drives soil respiration. Nature 411:789–792

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks JJ, Hendrick RL, Wilson CA, Mitchell RJ, Pecot SD, Guo D (2006) Assessing the patterns and controls of fine root dynamics: an empirical test and methodological review. J Ecol 94:40–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horgan GW, Buckland ST, Mackie-Dawson LA (1993) Estimating three-dimensional line process densities from tube counts. Biometrics 49:899–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itoh S (1985) In situ measurement of rooting density by micro-rhizotron. Soil Sci Plant Nutrit 31:653–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RB, Mooney HA, Schulze E-D (1997) A global budget for fine root biomass, surface area, and nutrient contents. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 94:7362–7366

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan CF, Escalante G (1980) Root productivity in an Amazonian rain forest. Ecol 61:14–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe DB, Williams M, Aragão LEOC, da Costa ACL, de Almeida SS, Braga AP, Gonçalves PHL, de Athaydes Silva Junior J, Malhi Y, Meir P (2007) A method for extracting plant roots from soil which facilitates rapid sample processing without compromising measurement accuracy. New Phytol 174:697–703

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruivo MLP, Cunha ES (2003) Mineral and organic components in archaeological black earth and yellow latosol in Caxiuanã, Amazon, Brazil. In: Tiezzi E, Brebbia CA, Uso JL (eds) Ecosystems and sustainable development. WIT, London, pp 319–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Gallén I, Alvarez-Sánchez J (1996) Root productivity in a lowland tropical forest in Mexico. Vegetatio 123:109–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanford RL (1989) Fine root biomass under a tropical forest light gap opening in Costa Rica. J Trop Ecol 5:251–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanford RL (1990) Fine root biomass under light gap openings in an Amazon rain forest. Oecologia 83:541–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver WL, Thompson AW, McGroddy ME, Varner RK, Robertson JR, Dias JD, Silva H, Crill P, Keller M (2005) Fine root dynamics and trace gas fluxes in two lowland tropical forest soils. Glob Change Biol 11:290–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit A, Bengough A, Engels C, van Noordwijk M, Pellerin S, van de Geijn SC (2000) Root methods: a handbook. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Steingrobe B, Schmid H, Claassen N (2000) The use of the ingrowth core method for measuring root production of arable crops – influence of soil conditions inside the ingrowth core on root growth. J Plant Nutrit Soil Sci 163:617–622

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor HM, Huck MG, Klepper B, Lund ZF (1970) Measurement of soil-grown roots in a rhizotron. Agron J 62:807–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tingey DT, Phillips DL, Johnson MG (2000) Elevated CO2 and conifer roots: effects on growth, life span and turnover. New Phytol 147:87–103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt KA, Vogt DJ, Bloomfield J (1998) Analysis of some direct and indirect methods of estimating root biomass and production of forests at an ecosystem level. Plant Soil 200:71–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Withington JM, Elkin AD, Bulaj B, Olesinski J, Tracy KN, Bouma TJ, Oleksyn J, Anderson LJ, Modrzyński J, Reich PB, Eissenstat DM (2003) The impact of material used for minirhizotron tubes for root research. New Phytol 160:533–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yavitt JB, Wright JS (2001) Drought and irrigation effect on fine root dynamics in a tropical moist forest, Panama. Biotropica 33:421–434

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a Natural Environment Research Council (UK) PhD studentship and a Standard Research Grant (NER/A/S/2003/1609), a Royal Society (UK) Dudley Stamp Memorial Fund award, and an Elizabeth Sinclair Fund award (School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, UK). The manuscript benefited from valuable comments by P. Y. Bernier. The authors would like to thank Leonardo Sá, Ima Vieira, and Samuel Almeida for their scientific support and collaboration, the Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi for the use of its field station and laboratory facilities, and Bene and Joca for committed field work assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. B. Metcalfe.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Hinsinger

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Metcalfe, D.B., Meir, P. & Williams, M. A comparison of methods for converting rhizotron root length measurements into estimates of root mass production per unit ground area. Plant Soil 301, 279–288 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9447-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9447-6

Keywords

Navigation