Skip to main content
Log in

Against intentionalism

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intentionalism is the claim that the phenomenological properties of a perceptual experience supervene on its intentional properties. The paper presents a counter-example to this claim, one that concerns visual grouping phenomenology. I argue that this example is superior to superficially similar examples involving grouping phenomenology offered by Peacocke (Sense and Content, Oxford: Oxford University Press), because the standard intentionalist responses to Peacocke’s examples cannot be extended to mine. If Intentionalism fails, it is impossible to reduce the phenomenology of an experience to its content.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Block N. (1996). Mental Paint and Mental Latex. In: Villanueva, E. (eds) Philosophical Issues 7: Perception, pp 19–49. Ridgeview Press, Atascadero, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne A. (2001). Intentionalism Defended. The Philosophical Review 110(2): 199–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, A. (2005): ‘Inverted Qualia’, in E.N. Zalta (ed)., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2005/entries/qualia-inverted/.

  • Chalmers D.J. (2004). The Representational Character of Experience. In: Leiter, B. (eds) The Future for Philosophy, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske F. (1995). Naturalizing the Mind. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA .

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans G. (1982). The Varieties of Reference. Oxford University Press, Oxford .

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor J.A. (1994). A Theory of Content and other Essays. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 89–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege G. (1997). On Sense and Reference. In: (eds) The Frege Reader, pp 151–172. Blackwell, Oxford .

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman G. (1999). Reasoning, Meaning and Mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 244–261 .

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heck R.G. (2000). Nonconceptual Content and the “Space of Reasons”. The Philosophical Review 109(4): 485–523 .

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis D.K. (1983). Attitudes De Dicto and De Se Philosophical Papers. Oxford University Press, New York, 133–159 .

    Google Scholar 

  • Lycan W. (1996). Consciousness and Experience. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA .

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack A. and Rock I. (1998). Inattentional Blindness. MIT Press, Cambridge .

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell J. (1994). Mind and World. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA .

    Google Scholar 

  • Nida-Räumelin M. (1996). Pseudonormal Vision: An actual Case of Qualia Inversion?. Philosophical Studies 82(2): 145–157 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer S. (1999). Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacocke C. (1983). Sense and Content. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacocke C. (1992). A Study of Concepts. MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacocke C. (2001). Does Perception have a Nonconceptual Content?. The Journal of Philosophy 98(5): 239–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell B. (1912/1977). The Problems of Philosophy. Oxford University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle J.R. (1983). Intentionality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker S. (1982). The Inverted Spectrum. The Journal of Philosophy 79(7): 357–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker S. (1994a). Phenomenal Character. Noûs 28(1): 21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker S. (1994b). Self-Knowledge and Inner Sense: Lecture III: The Phenomenal Character of Experience. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54(2): 291–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siewert C.P. (1998). The Significance of Consciousness. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker R.C. (1984). Inquiry. MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker R.C. (1998). What might Non-Conceptual Content be?. In: Villanueva, E. (eds) Philosophical Issues 9: Concepts, pp 339–352. Atascadero, Ridgeview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker R.C. (2003). Ways a World might be. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 219–238.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thau M. (2002). Consciousness and Cognition. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis C. (2004). The Silence of the Senses. Mind 113(449): 57–94 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tye M. (1995). Ten Problems of Consciousness. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tye M. (2000). Consciousness, Color and Content. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA .

    Google Scholar 

  • Tye M. (2005). Nonconceptual Content, Richness and Fineness of Grain. In: Gendler, T. and Hawthorne, J. (eds) Perceptual Experience, pp. Oxford University Press, Oxford .

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein L. (1953). Philosophical Investigations, Trans. Anscombe. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernard Nickel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nickel, B. Against intentionalism. Philos Stud 136, 279–304 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-005-2013-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-005-2013-2

Keywords

Navigation