Skip to main content
Log in

Direct observation of telephone communication between community pharmacies and prescribers in New Zealand

  • Short Research Report
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background Phone calls between pharmacists and prescribers play an important role in resolving potential errors and other issues. Despite their importance in patient care, and sometimes causing frustration for pharmacists, there is little research on these calls. Objective To quantify how long calls between pharmacists and prescribers are, how often phone calls occur, why calls are made, and who is called. Method An observational study was conducted with 130.5 h observed in 11 community pharmacies over 8 weeks in Dunedin, New Zealand, recording information about all incoming and outgoing calls. Data captured included information on length, date, time, reason for call, pharmacy staff involved, health professionals involved, and the place being called. We also surveyed pharmacists’ perceptions of this communication. Results Data on 95 phone calls was captured. The mean length was 110 s (95% CI 88–133), at an average of 0.7 calls per hour. The most frequent reasons for calling were clarifications and dose inquiries. Conclusion Calling prescribers is perceived as a frustrating; however the frequency of calls we observed was low, but some were long. The amount of time spent for pharmacist interventions may be reduced using alternative communication methods but these need further study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Ranelli PL, Biss J. Physicians’ perceptions of communication with and responsibilities of pharmacists. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2000;40(5):625–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Davis L, Brunetti L, Lee E-K, Yoon N, Cho S-H, Suh D-C. Effects of computerized physician order entry on medication turnaround time and orders requiring pharmacist intervention. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2014;10(5):756–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kelly DV, Bishop L, Young S, Hawboldt J, Phillips L, Keough TM. Pharmacist and physician views on collaborative practice. Can Pharm J. 2013;146(4):218–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Weissenborn M, Haefeli WE, Peters-Klimm F, Seidling HM. Interprofessional communication between community pharmacists and general practitioners: a qualitative study. Int J Clin Pharm. 2017;39(3):495–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Green JA, Ross J, Stubbe M. Spoken and written interaction between community pharmacy staff and general practitioners [family physicians]. Int J Pharm Pract. 2016;24:14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lambert BL. Face and politeness in pharmacist–physician interaction. Soc Sci Med. 1996;43(8):1189–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lambert BL. Directness and deference in pharmacy students’ messages to physicians. Soc Sci Med. 1995;40(4):545–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hasan S. A tool to teach communication skills to pharmacy students. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;72(3):67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Peters G-JY. Diamond plots: a tutorial to introduce a visualisation tool that facilitates interpretation and comparison of multiple sample estimates while respecting their inaccuracy. Health Psychol Bull. 2017. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/fzh6c.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Arroll N. Invisible clinicians: the role of the receptionist in general practice [Masters Thesis]. Auckland: University of Auckland; 2011.

  11. Mobasheri MH, King D, Johnston M, Gautama S, Purkayastha S, Darzi A. The ownership and clinical use of smartphones by doctors and nurses in the UK: a multicentre survey study. BMJ Innov. 2015;1(4):174–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bexci M, Subramani R. ICT communication between oncologists and oncology pharmacists in India: a pilot study. World J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2015;5(1):884–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James A. Green.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 50 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Trausch, N., Green, J.A. Direct observation of telephone communication between community pharmacies and prescribers in New Zealand. Int J Clin Pharm 40, 1005–1009 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-018-0687-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-018-0687-8

Keywords

Navigation