Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Identification of risks associated with the prescribing and dispensing of oral anticancer medicines in Ireland

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background Oral anticancer medicines (OAM) facilitate transfer of cancer care into the community, where safeguards developed in hospitals that control their prescribing, dispensing and administration may not exist. Objective To determine if the systems of prescribing and dispensing OAM in Ireland facilitate clinical verification of the prescription, thereby ensuring treatment is tailored and appropriate for the patient. Setting Randomly selected community pharmacies in Ireland and all Irish hospitals with cancer services. Method A questionnaire was sent to a random selection of Irish community pharmacists. A different questionnaire was sent to all Irish hospitals treating cancer patients. One hundred OAM prescriptions were retrospectively reviewed, to assess the information presented and the potential barriers to a community pharmacist performing a clinical verification of the prescription. Main outcome measure Community pharmacist survey: problems experienced when dispensing OAM and risk factors identified with the current system. Hospital pharmacist survey: proportion of hospitals that clinically verify prescriptions for parenteral versus oral anticancer medicines and associated policies. OAM prescription review: proportion of OAM prescriptions that contained sufficient information for a community pharmacist to clinically verify the prescription and safely dispense the medication. Results Sixty-four percent of community pharmacist respondents felt they did not have enough information available to them to safely dispense these prescriptions, and 74 % felt that patients are at risk with the current Irish system of prescribing and dispensing OAM. Irish hospitals do not have systems to ensure that all OAM prescriptions are clinically verified by a pharmacist. Seventeen different agents were prescribed on the prescriptions reviewed. The information provided to the community pharmacist would have allowed them to clinically verify 7 % of the OAM prescriptions. Conclusion Prescriptions for OAM reach the community pharmacist with little chance that they have been clinically verified in the hospital and the medicine reaches the patient with little chance that the community pharmacist has been able to clinically verify it. Healthcare risks are increased when inadequate information about patients and their medicines are available. Appropriate specialist practitioners should be provided nationally to clinically oversee each stage of the OAM use process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Cancer Registry. Cancer projections 2005–2035 [Internet]. Cork: National Cancer Registry; 2008. Available from: http://www.ncri.i.e/pubs/pubfiles/CancerProjections2010-2035v4.pdf. Cited 15 May 2012.

  2. Department of Health and Children, National Cancer Forum. A strategy for cancer control in Ireland [Internet]. Dublin: Health Service Executive; 2006. Available from: http://www.hse.i.e/eng/services/Publications/HealthProtection/Public_Health_/National_Cancer_Control_Strategy.html. Updated 12 Oct 2009; cited 15 May 2012.

  3. Primary Care Reimbursement Service. Statistical analysis of claims and payments 2006–2010 [Internet]. Dublin: Health Service Executive; 2012. Available from http://www.hse.i.e/eng/staff/PCRS/PCRS_Publications/. Updated 4 Jan 2012; cited 12 Feb 2012.

  4. Weingart SN, Brown E, Bach PB, Eng K, Johnson SA, Kuzel TM, et al. NCCN task force report: oral chemotherapy. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2008;6(Supp 3):S1–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Campbell M, Kaufman M, Bendix J. Oral oncology drugs. Drugs Top. 2009;153:28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Aisner J. Overview of the changing paradigm in cancer treatment: oral chemotherapy. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007;64(Supp 5):S4–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bartel S. Safe practices and financial considerations in using oral chemotherapeutic agents. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007;64(Supp 5):S8–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. O’Neill VJ, Twelves CJ. Oral cancer treatment: developments in chemotherapy and beyond. Br J Cancer. 2002;87:933–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Halfdanarson TR, Jatoi A. Oral cancer chemotherapy: the critical interplay between patient education and patient safety. Curr Oncol Rep. 2010;12:247–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Department of Health and Children. Guidelines for the safe administration of cytotoxic medical preparations in the treatment of patients with cancer [Internet]. Dublin: 1996. Available from: http://www.dohc.i.e/publications/pdf/cytotoxicdrugs.pdf?direct=1. Cited May 4 2012.

  11. American Society of Health-System Pharmacy (ASHP). Guidelines on preventing medication errors with antineoplastic agents. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2002;59:1648–68.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Department of Health UK. Manual for Cancer Services [Internet]. London: 2004. Available from: http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Healthcare/Cancer/DH_4135595. Updated 29 Nov 2007; cited 15 May 2012.

  13. Viele CS. Managing oral chemotherapy: the healthcare practitioner’s role. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007;64:S25–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Simchowitz B, Shiman L, Spencer J, Brouillard D, Gross A, Connor M, et al. Perceptions and experiences of patients receiving oral chemotherapy. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2010;14:447–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chan A, Leow YC, Sim MH. Patients’ perspectives and safe handling of oral anticancer drugs at an Asian cancer centre. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2009;15:161–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Banna GL, Collova E, Gebbia V, Lipari H, Giuffrida P, Cavallaro S, et al. Anticancer oral therapy: emerging related issues. Cancer Treat Rev. 2010;36:595–605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Grimes T, Delaney T, Duggan C, Kelly JG, Graham IM. Survey of medication documentation at hospital discharge: implications for patient safety and continuity of care. Ir J Med Sci. 2008;177:93–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Glintborg B, Andersen SE, Dalhoff K. Insufficient communication about medication use at the interface between hospital and primary care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007;16:34–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA). Rapid response report: risks of incorrect dosing of oral anti-cancer medicines [Internet]. London: NPSA; 2008. Available from: http://www.npsa.nhs.uk/nrls/alerts-and-directives/rapidrr/risks-of-incorrect-dosing-of-oral-anti-cancer-medicines/. Cited 15 May 2012.

  20. National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA). Additional information to support the NPSA rapid response report: risks of incorrect dosing of oral anti-cancer medicines [Internet]. London: NPSA; 2008. Available from: http://www.npsa.nhs.uk/nrls/alerts-and-directives/rapidrr/risks-of-incorrect-dosing-of-oral-anti-cancer-medicines/. Cited 15 May 2012.

  21. British Oncology Pharmacy Assocation. Standards for clinical pharmacy verfication of prescriptions for cancer medicines. [Internet]. London: BOPA; 2010. Available from: http://www.bopawebsite.org/contentimages/publications/BOPA_Standards_for_Clinical_Pharmacy_Verification_of_SACT_FINAL_29.1.10.pdf. Cited 14 May 2012.

  22. The Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia (SHPA). Committee of speciality practice in cancer services. SHPA Standards of practice for the provision of oral chemotherapy for the treatment of cancer. J Pharm Pract Res. 2007;37:149–52.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jacobson JO, Polovich M, McNiff KK, Lefebvre KB, Cummings C, Galioto M, et al. American society of clinical oncology/oncology nursing society chemotherapy administration safety standards. J Clin Oncol. 2009;32:5469–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Taylor JA, Winter L, Geyer LJ, Hawkins DS. Oral outpatients chemotherapy medication errors in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer. 2006;106:1400–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP). Medication Safety Alert: Lowdown on Lomustine. We’d hate CeeNu make this mistake [Internet]. United States: ISMP; 2004. Available from: http://www.ismp.org/newsletters/acutecare/articles/20040715.asp. Cited 14 May 2012.

  26. Holquist C, Philips J. Fatal medication errors associated with Temodar. Drug Top. 2003;147:42.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Weingart SN, Toro J, Spencer J, Duncombe D, Gross A, Bartel S, et al. Medication errors involving oral chemotherapy. Cancer. 2010;116:2455–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. O’Halloran G. Woman who died given wrong drugs [Internet]. The Irish Times. 2008 Jul 7. Available from: http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2008/0718/1216330999747.html. Cited 14 May 2012.

  29. Schwappach DL, Wernli M. Medication errors in chemotherapy: incidence, types and involvement of patients in prevention. A review of the literature. Eur J Cancer Care. 2010;19:285–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Health Service Executive. Public hospitals in Ireland [Internet]. Available from: http://www.hse.i.e/eng/services/Find_a_Service/hospitals/hospitallist.html. Updated 26 July 2011; cited 4 May 2012.

  31. Casali PG. The off-label use of drugs in oncology: a position paper by the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). Ann Oncol. 2007;18:1923–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Abernethy AP, Raman G, Balk EM, Hammond JM, Orlando LA, Wheeler JL, et al. Systematic review: reliability of compendia methods for off-label oncology indications. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:336–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pharmaceutical Society of Ireland. Pharmacy Practice Guidance Manual: A self audit tool for pharmacists and pharmacy owners. 1st ed [Internet]. Dublin: PSI; 2008. Available from: http://www.thepsi.i.e/tns/publications/practice-guidance.aspx. Cited 14 May 2012.

  34. Weingart SN, Spencer J, Buia J, Duncombe D, Singh P, Gadkari M, et al. Medication safety of five oral chemotherapies: a proactive risk assessment. J Oncol Pract. 2011;7:2–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Markert A, Thierry V, Kleber M, Behrens M, Engelhardt M. Chemotherapy safety and severe adverse events in cancer patients: strategies to efficiently avoid chemotherapy errors in in- and outpatient treatment. Int J Cancer. 2009;124:722–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Gandi TK, Bartel SB, Shulman LN, Verrier D, Burdick E, Cleary A, et al. Medication safety in the ambulatory chemotherapy setting. Cancer. 2005;104:2477–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. British Columbia Cancer Agency. Pharmacy Guide to Chemotherapy: Clinical Assessment and Review (3rd edn). [Internet]. Canada: BC Cancer Agency; 2011. Available from: http://www.bccancer.bc.ca/HPI/Pharmacy/GuidesManuals/PharmacyGuideChemo/default.htm. Updated 5 April 2012; cited 16 May 2012.

  38. Irish Medication Safety Network (IMSN). Briefing document on oral anticancer medicines [Internet]. Dublin: IMSN; 2011. Available from: http://www.imsn.i.e/MNS%20OAM%20document%20January%202011.pdf. Cited 19 Apr 2012.

  39. Weingart SN, Flug J, Brouillard D, Morway L, Partridge A, Bartel A, et al. Oral chemotherapy safety practices at US cancer centres: questionnaire survey. BMJ. 2007;334:407–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Henman M. Prescriptions: safety, security and communication. Ir Pharm J. 2007;85:488–9.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Liddell MJ, Goldman SP. Attitudes to and use of a modified prescription form by general practitioners and pharmacists. Med J Aus. 1998;168:322–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank June O’Shea, Chief Pharmacist of St. Vincent’s University Hospital, for her support.

Funding

None received.

Conflicts of interest

None of the authors have any conflicts of interest concerning this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pharmacy Department, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland

    Lisa Hammond, Elaine Marsden, Niamh O’Hanlon & Claire Keane

  2. Pharmacy Department, St. James’s Hospital, James’ St., Dublin 8, Ireland

    Fionnuala King

  3. The School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland

    Martin Charles Henman

Authors
  1. Lisa Hammond
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elaine Marsden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Niamh O’Hanlon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fionnuala King
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Martin Charles Henman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Claire Keane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa Hammond.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hammond, L., Marsden, E., O’Hanlon, N. et al. Identification of risks associated with the prescribing and dispensing of oral anticancer medicines in Ireland. Int J Clin Pharm 34, 893–901 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-012-9688-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-012-9688-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation