Skip to main content
Log in

Reliability analysis for the uncertainties in vehicle and high-speed railway bridge system based on an improved response surface method for nonlinear limit states

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Nonlinear Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper deals with the reliability analysis for the high-speed railway bridge systems. Although the bridge–vehicle interactive system has much more uncertainties in the resistance and loads of trains moving at very high speed compared with static structural analysis, little concern has been engaged to identify which random variable has to be considered in the probabilistic analysis, or what criteria should be selected to determine the probabilistic safety or serviceability. The considered design parameters thus involve uncertainties in stiffness, moment of inertia, damping ratio of primary suspension in terms of load, geometry of girders and slabs, and the mechanical properties of girders in terms of resistance. The considered limit states embrace the safety of trains and comfort of passengers, and the acceptability criteria are based on UIC code. For evaluating the reliability of the time-dependent nonlinear behavior of complex structures, an improved Response Surface Method (RSM) is developed. An adaptive technique and a weight matrix are utilized as an optimizing technique that accelerates the convergence in the reliability analysis. The results of improved RSM, compared with the basic and adaptive RSM, are verified with the improved convergence to the exact solution. The bridge response is analyzed using a new three-dimensional finite element model of high-speed train–bridge interactions. The track structures are idealized using beam elements with the offset of beam nodes and beams on a two-parameter elastic foundation. The vehicle model developed for a 300 km/h train is employed. The calculated reliabilities for performance of the considered bridges and the passenger comfort on board of high-speed trains are compared to the conventional safety indices. The results of this study allow identifying the quantification of uncertainties that can control quality of the high-speed train service.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. O’Connor, C., Chan, T.H.T.: Dynamic loads from bridge strains. ASCE J. Struct. Eng. 114, 1703–1723 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Law, S.S., Chan, T.H.T., Zeng, Q.H.: Moving force identification: a time domain method. J. Sound Vib. 201(1), 1–22 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Law, S.S., Chan, T.H.T., Zeng, Q.H.: Moving force identification: a frequency and time domains analysis. ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 12(3), 394–401 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chan, T.H.T., Law, S.S., Yung, T.H., Yuan, X.R.: An interpretive method for moving force identification. J. Sound Vib. 219(3), 503–524 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lin, J.H.: Response of a bridge to a moving vehicle load. Can. J. Civil Eng. 33(9), 49–57 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. D’Aveni, A., Muscolino, G., Ricciardi, G.: Stochastic analysis of a simply supported beam with uncertain parameters subjected to a moving load. Struct. Dyn. 1, 439–446 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hwang, E.S., Nowak, A.S.: Simulation of dynamic load for bridges. ASCE J. Struct. Eng. 117(5), 1413–1434 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nassif, H., Nowak, A.S.: Dynamic load spectra for girder bridges. Transp. Res. Rec. 1476, 69–83 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Minasny, B., McBratney, A.B.: A conditioned Latin hypercube method for sampling in the presence of ancillary information. Comput. Geosci. 32(9), 1378–1388 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Janssens, D., Wets, G., Brijs, T., Vanhoof, K.: The development of an adapted Markov chain modelling heuristic and simulation framework in the context of transportation research. Expert Syst. Appl. 28(1), 105–117 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hisada, T., Nakagiri, S.: Role of stochastic finite element method in structural safety and reliability. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability, ICOSSAR’85, pp. 385–395 (1985)

  12. Ghanem, R.G., Spanos, P.D.: Stochastic Finite Elements for Spectral Approach. Springer, Berlin (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Takada, T.: Weighted integral method in stochastic finite element analysis. Probab. Eng. Mech. 5(3), 146–156 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Deodatis, G., Shinozuka, M.: The weighted integral method, II: response variability and reliability. J. Eng. Mech. 117(8), 1865–1877 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Box, G.E.P., Wilson, K.B.: On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 13, 1–45 (1951)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Bucher, C.G., Bourgund, U.: A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems. Struct. Saf. 7(1), 57–66 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rajaschekhar, M.R., ELlingwood, B.R.: A new look at the response surface approach for reliability analysis. Struct. Saf. 12, 205–220 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Engelund, S., Rackwitz, R.: A benchmark study on importance sampling techniques in structural reliability. Struct. Saf. 12(4), 255–276 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Guan, X.L., Melchers, R.E.: Effect of response surface parameters variation on structural reliability estimates. Struct. Saf. 23, 429–444 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nowak, A.S., Cho, T.: Prediction of the combination of failure modes for an arch bridge system. J. Constr. Steel Res. 63, 1561–1569 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee, S.H., Kwak, B.M.: Response surface augmented moment method for efficient reliability analysis. Struct. Saf. 28, 261–272 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim, S., Na, S.: Response surface method using vector projected sampling points. Struct. Saf. 19(1), 3–19 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kaymaza, I., McMahonb, C.A.: A response surface method based on weighted regression for structural reliability analysis. Probab. Eng. Mech. 20, 11–17 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rackwitz, R., Fiessler, B.: Structural reliability under combined random load sequences. Comput. Struct. 489–494 (1978)

  25. Song, M.K., Noh, H.C., Choi, C.K.: A new three-dimensional finite element analysis model of high-speed train–bridge interactions. Eng. Struct. 25, 1611–1626 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Choi, C.K., Chung, K.Y., Lee, T.Y.: A direct integration method for strains due to nonconforming modes. Int. J. Struct. Eng. Mech. 11(3), 325–340 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  27. UIC Code 776-1. International Union of Railways (2006)

  28. ERRI D 214: Rail Bridges for Speeds >200 km/h. RP9, European Rail Research Institute, pp. 21–24, 152–154 (1999)

  29. Ministry of Construction and Transportation: Development of Safety in High-Speed Train in Korea, Table 5.4.1 (2000)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Do Hyung Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cho, T., Song, MK. & Lee, D.H. Reliability analysis for the uncertainties in vehicle and high-speed railway bridge system based on an improved response surface method for nonlinear limit states. Nonlinear Dyn 59, 1–17 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-009-9521-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-009-9521-0

Keywords

Navigation