Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Identifying urban–rural differences in social vulnerability to natural hazards: a case study of China

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Identifying and analyzing the urban–rural differences of social vulnerability to natural hazards is imperative to ensure that urbanization develops in a way that lessens the impacts of disasters and generate building resilient livelihoods in China. Using data from the 2000 and 2010 population censuses, this study conducted an assessment of the social vulnerability index (SVI) by applying the projection pursuit cluster model. The temporal and spatial changes of social vulnerability in urban and rural areas were then examined during China’s rapid urbanization period. An index of urban–rural differences in social vulnerability (SVID) was derived, and the global and local Moran’s I of the SVID were calculated to assess the spatial variation and association between the urban and rural SVI. In order to fully determine the impacts of urbanization in relation to social vulnerability, a spatial autoregressive model and Bivariate Moran’s I between urbanization and SVI were both calculated. The urban and rural SVI both displayed a steadily decreasing trend from 2000 to 2010, although the urban SVI was always larger than the rural SVI in the same year. In 17.5% of the prefectures, the rural SVI was larger than the urban SVI in 2000, but was smaller than the urban SVI in 2010. About 12.6% of the urban areas in the prefectures became less vulnerable than rural areas over the study period, while in more than 51.73% of the prefectures the urban–rural SVI gap decreased over the same period. The SVID values in all prefectures had a significantly positive spatial autocorrelation and spatial clusters were apparent. Over time, social vulnerability to natural hazards at the prefecture-level displayed a gathering–scattering pattern across China. Though a regional variation of social vulnerability developed during China’s rapid urbanization, the overall trend was for a steady reduction in social vulnerability in both urban and rural areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to the reviewers and editors for their critical comments that greatly helped to improve the quality of this paper.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41571488, 41401382 and 41701186), and the Philosophy and Social Sciences Foundation in Jiangsu Province (Grant No. 17JDB010).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Data curation, Yi Ge, Yi Chen and Ziyuan Zhang; Formal analysis, Yi Ge and Xiaotao Wang; Methodology, Wen Dou; Software, Wen Dou; Visualization, Wen Dou; Writing—original draft, Yi Ge.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wen Dou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ge, Y., Dou, W., Wang, X. et al. Identifying urban–rural differences in social vulnerability to natural hazards: a case study of China. Nat Hazards 108, 2629–2651 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04792-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04792-9

Keywords

Navigation