Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Seismic risk evaluation of highway tunnel groups

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tunnels allow the continuity of rural road and urban transportation networks. Their shutdown provokes a loss in the transport system’s level service, which entails higher road user costs. Earthquakes are the hazard that most affect the tunnels’ serviceability. Depending on the structural damage’s magnitude, the serviceability loss can be at different degrees, from marginal changes in traffic flow, associated with minor damages, to traffic interruption, associated with collapsing. Because of seismic phenomena’ randomness nature, its effect on tunnel serviceability is estimated in probabilistic terms. Traffic interruption probability was estimated using fragility curves, representing the probability of achieving a specific damage state regarding the seismic hazard intensity. The calibration of tunnel fragility curves requires large samples of damages, seismic intensities, and geological and constructive data, which are not always available, especially in countries with a small number of tunnels in their road network. This work proposes a simplified procedure for evaluating the tunnels’ traffic interruption probability due to earthquakes. The approach proposed uses existent seismic exposures maps, a strategy for selecting from existing fragility curves the more suitable, and a simple method to estimate the traffic interruption probability. The procedure analysed 20 tunnels affected by the Maule earthquake in Chile. These tunnels experimented PGA between 0.12 and 0.36 g. The highest risk values were obtained in tunnels without alternative routes and high repairing costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Adapted from Rossetto et al. (2014)

Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akiyama M, Frangopol D, Ishibashi H (2020) Toward lifecycle reliability-, risk- and resilience-based design and assessment of bridges and bridge networks under independent and interacting hazards: emphasis on earthquake, tsunami and corrosion. Struct Infrastruct Eng 16(1–2):26–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2019.1604770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ALA (2001) Seismic fragility formulations for water systems, part 1 Guideline, American Lifelines Alliance, United States

  • Andreotti G (2019) Lai CG (2019) Use of fragility curves to assess the seismic vulnerability in the risk analysis of mountain tunnels. Tunn Undergr Space Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.103008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreotti G, Lai CG (2015) Methodology to derive damage state-dependent fragility curves of underground tunnels. In: 6th International conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering, 1–4 November, Christchurch, New Zealand

  • Argyroudis S, Pitilakis KD (2012) Seismic fragility curves of shallow tunnels in alluvial deposits. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 35:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyroudis S, Kaynia AM (2014) Fragility functions of highway and railway infrastructure. In: Pitilakis K et al (eds) SYNER-G: typology definition and fragility functions for physical elements at seismic risk, geotechnical, geological and earthquake engineering 27. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 299–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyroudis S, Tsinidis G, Gatti F, Pitilakis KD (2014) Seismic fragility curves of shallow tunnels considering SSI and aging effects. In: 2nd Eastern European tunneling conference, 28 Sep–1 Oct, Athens, Greece

  • Argyroudis S, Tsinidis G, Gatti F, Pitilakis KD (2017) Effects of SSI and lining corrosion on the seismic vulnerability of shallow circular tunnels. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 98:244–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.04.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyroudis S, Mitoulis SA, Winter M, Kaynia AM (2019) Fragility of transport assets exposed to multiple hazards: state-of-the-art review toward infrastructural resilience. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.106567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyroudis S, Mitoulis SA, Hofer LZ (2020) Resilience assessment framework for critical infrastructure in a multi-hazard environment: case study on transport assets. Sci Total Environ 714(2020):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asakura T, Tsukada K, Matsunaga T, Matsuoka S, Yashiro K, Shiba Y, Oya T (2007) Damage to mountains tunnels by earthquake and its mechanism. In: 11th International society for rock mechanics and rock engineering congress, 9–13 July, Portugal

  • Avanaki MH, Hoseini A, Vahdani S, de Santos C (2018) Seismic fragility curves for vulnerability assessment of steel fiber reinforced concrete segmental tunnel linings. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 78(2018):259–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.04.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CH, Wang TT, Jeng FS, Huang TH (2012) Mechanisms causing seismic damage of tunnels at different depths. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 28:31–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choun YS, Elnashai AS (2010) A simplified framework for probabilistic earthquake loss estimation. Probab Eng Mech 25(4):355–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2010.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Codermatz R, Nicolich R, NSlejko D (2003) Seismic risk assessments and GIS technology: applications to infrastructures in the Friuli-Venezia Giulia region (NE Italy). Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 32:1677–1690. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corigliano M, Lai CG, Barla G (2007) Seismic vulnerability of rock tunnels using fragility curves. In: Ribeiro e Sousa L, Olalla C, Grossmann N (eds) 11th Congress of the international society for rock mechanics, Taylor and Francis, London, pp 1173–1176

  • D’Andrea A, Cafiso S, Condorelli A (2005) Methodological considerations for the evaluation of seismic risk on road network. Pure Appl Geophys 162(2005):767–782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-004-2640-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Silva F, Fabozzi S, Nikitas N, Bilotta E, Fuentes R (2020) Seismic vulnerability of circular tunnels in sand. Géotechnique. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.19.SiP.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decò A, Bochini P, Frangopol D (2013) A probabilistic approach for the prediction of seismic resilience of bridges. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 42:1469–1487. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowding CH, Rozen A (1978) Damage to rock tunnels from earthquake shaking. J Geotech Eng Div 104(2):175–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elnashai A, Gencturk B, Kwon OS, Al-Qadi I, Hashash Y, Roesler J, Kim SJ, Jeong, SH, Dukes J, Valdivia A (2010) The Maule (Chile) earthquake of February 27, 2010. Consequence assessment and case studies. Mid-America Earthquake Center. Report No. 10-04. MAE Center, United States

  • Fabozzi S, Bilotta EP, Zollo M (2018) Feasibility study of a loss-driven earthquake early warning and rapid response systems for tunnels of the Italian high-speed railway network. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 112(2018):232–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.05.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA (2011) Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology. Earthquake model. Technical manual. Federal Emergency Management Agency, United States

  • Hu X, Zhou Z, Chen H, Ren Y (2020) Seismic fragility analysis of tunnels with different buried depths in a soft soil. Sustainability 12:892. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang G, Qiu W, Zhang J (2017) Modelling seismic fragility of a rock mountain tunnel based on support vector machine. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 102(2017):160–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang ZK, Pitilakis K, Tsinidis G, Argyroudis S, Zhang DM (2020) Seismic vulnerability of circular tunnels in soft soil deposits: the case of Shanghai metropolitan system. Tunn Undergr Space Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy RP, Cornell CA, Campbell RD, Kaplan S, Perla HF (1980) Probabilistic seismic safety study of an existing nuclear power plant. Nucl Eng Des 59(2):315–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(80)90203-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le TS, Huh J, Park JH (2014) Earthquake fragility assessment of the underground tunnel using an efficient SSI analysis approach. J Appl Math Phys 2:1073–1078. https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2014.212123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medina F, Yanev PI, Yanev A (2010) El terremoto de magnitud 8,8 costa afuera de la región del Maule, Chile del 27 de febrero de 2010. Resumen preliminar de los daños y recomendaciones de ingeniería. Reporte 70138. Banco Mundial, Estados Unidos (in Spanish)

  • MOP (2016) Asset valuation of the national highway network. Highways Management Department (in Spanish). Ministry of Public Works. Chile

  • MOP (2018) National Traffic Survey Ministry of Public Works, Chile

  • MOP (2019) Quarterly reports (in Spanish). Public Works Concessions Directorate. Ministry of Public Works, Chile

  • MSDF (2020) Unit cost of the national investment system. Ministry of Social Development and Family, Chile (in Spanish)

  • Nazari YR, Bargi K (2012) Practical approach to fragility analysis of bridges. Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol 4(23):5177–5182

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen DD, Park D, Shamsher S, Nguyen VQ, Lee TH (2019) Seismic vulnerability assessment of rectangular cut-and-cover subway tunnels. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 86:247–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.01.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osmi SKC, Ahmad SM (2016) Seismic fragility curves for shallow circular tunnels under different soil conditions. J Civ Environ Eng 10(10):1351–1357

    Google Scholar 

  • Park D, Lee TH, Nguyen DD, Ahn JK (2019) Development of fragility curves for underground box tunnels from nonlinear frame analysis. In: Silvestri F, Moraci N (eds) Earthquake geotechnical engineering for protection and development of environment and constructions—proceedings of the 7th international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering, pp 4371–4378

  • Poulos A, Monsalve M, Zamora N, de la Llera JC (2019) An updated recurrence model for Chilean subduction seismicity and statistical validation of its Poisson nature. Bull Seismol Soc Am 109(1):66–74. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120170160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu W, Huang G, Zhou H, Xu W (2018) Seismic vulnerability analysis of rock tunnel. Int J Geomech. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossetto T, D’Ayala D, Ioannou I, Meslem A (2014) Evaluation of existing fragility curves. In: Pitilakis K et al (eds) SYNER-G: typology definition and fragility functions for physical elements at seismic risk, geotechnical, geological and earthquake engineering 27. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 47–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy N, Sarkar R (2017) A review of seismic damage of mountains tunnels and probable failure mechanisms. Geotech Geol Eng 35(2017):1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-016-0091-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherbaum F, Kuehn N (2011) Logic tree branch weights and probabilities: summing up to one is not enough. Earthq Spectra 27(4):1237–1251. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3652744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherbaum F, Bommer J, Bungum H, Cotton F, Abrahamson NA (2005) Composite ground-motion models and logic trees: methodology, sensitivities, and uncertainties. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95(5):1575–1593. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120040229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selva J, Argyroudis S, Pitilakis K (2013) Impact on loss/risk assessments of inter-model variability in vulnerability analysis. Nat Hazards 67(2):723–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0616-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S, Judd W (1991) Underground opening damage from earthquakes. Eng Geol 30:263–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(91)90063-Q

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shedlock KM, Tanner JG (1999) Seismic hazard map of the western hemisphere. Ann Geophys 42(6):1199–1214. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-3779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shinozuka M, Feng MQ, Lee J, Naganuma T (2000) Statistical analysis of fragility curves. J Eng Mech 126(12):1224–1231. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:12(1224)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanuvamalai A, Jaya KP, Balachandran V (2018) Seismic performance of tunnels structures: a case study. Nat Hazards 93(1):453–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3308-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZZ, Zhang Z (2013) Seismic damage classification and risk assessment of mountain tunnels with a validation for the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 45(2013):45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang WL, Wang TT, Su JJ, Lin CH, Seng CR, Huang TH (2001) Assessment of damage in mountains tunnels due to the Taiwan Chi-Chi earthquake. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 16(1):133–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(01)00047-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner S, Taylor C, Cho S, Lavoie JP, Huyck C, Eitzel C, Chung H, Eguchi R (2006) Redars 2 methodology and software for seismic risk analysis of highway systems. Special report MCEER-07-SP08, The State University of New York, United States

  • Xiaoquing F, Junqui L, Xiaolan Z, Runzhou L (2008) Damage evaluation of tunnels in earthquakes. In: 14th World conference on earthquake engineering, October 12–17, Beijing. China

  • Yen WH, Chen G, Buckle I, Allen T, Alzamora D, Ger J, Arias JG (2011) Post-earthquake reconnaissance report on transportation infrastructure: impact of the February 27, 2010, Offshore Maule Earthquake in Chile. Report FHWA-HRT-11-030. Federal Highway Administration. The United States

  • Zhang X, Jiang Y, Sugimoto S (2018) Seismic damage assessment of mountain tunnel: a case study on the Tawarayama tunnel due to the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 71(2018):138–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.07.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the National Research and Development Agency (ANID) of Chile for supporting the projects CONICYT/FONDAP/15110017 project “National Research Center for Integrated Natural Disaster Management (CIGIDEN)” and FONDECYT 1181754 “Socio-economic modelling of mitigation strategies for resilient critical infrastructure: application to drink water systems and road networks”, within which this paper was prepared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Civil Engineering Department, Engineering Faculty, Universidad de Concepción, Edmundo Larenas 219, Concepción, Chile

    Pablo Cartes & Tomás Echaveguren

  2. Construction Engineering and Management Department, Engineering Faculty, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile

    Alondra Chamorro

  3. Research Center for the Integrated Management of Natural Disasters (CIGIDEN), ANID/FONDAP/15110017, Vicuña Mackenna, 4860, Santiago, Chile

    Alondra Chamorro & Tomás Echaveguren

Authors
  1. Pablo Cartes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alondra Chamorro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tomás Echaveguren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomás Echaveguren.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cartes, P., Chamorro, A. & Echaveguren, T. Seismic risk evaluation of highway tunnel groups. Nat Hazards 108, 2101–2121 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04770-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04770-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation